Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama has voted for $300 billion in war funding since 2005. Its his war as much...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:06 AM
Original message
Obama has voted for $300 billion in war funding since 2005. Its his war as much...
as it is Clinton's or Edwards'.

Kucinich stands alone as the anti-war candidate. Obama supporters attempts to paint him as being in the same arena as Dennis on Iraq is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama pushed the wrong button
besides, he meant to be campaigning or down with the stomach flu those days anyway :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. when running for his Senate seat he said he would vote against Bush request for 87 billion...
then when he's elected, he proceeds to vote for funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. What? Are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. it was a big part of his Senate campaign. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. *sigh*
See... but you have that lady going around saying he's "100% honest"... this kind of crap is just... ARGH!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. as was his promise to serve a Full Term
before running for President.

Can't blame pressing the wrong button on THAT broken promise, can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. How much has Hillary voted for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Once again!
Would it help if we color coat them for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, he is in it as deep as the others.
I hope they keep fighting. Onward to a brokered convention.gobam, go hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Its a Bush/Repug war--they own it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Then why are "Democrats" paying for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. Don't kid yourself.
This war was approved of by Democrats, funded by Democrats, and is now being perpetuated by Democrats to protect our chances in 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. We need to keep the onus on the Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bullshit. Senators who don't want to fall into the defunding trap don't "own" the war--
the GOP does. I don't agree with defunding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. So when he said he would not have voted for funding while running for the Senate he was lying? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Maybe he changed his mind? I don't know. Defunding is drastic, and
understandably, many don't want to go there--unintended consequences and all. I do know he opposed the war, which is good enough judgment for me. Getting in is easy. Getting us out is proving very difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, and succinctly said!
:kick: & :thumbsup: for truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Actually, it belongs to all of us, even to folks like me, who went into the streets
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:15 AM by patrice
in the Summer of 2002, to fight it . . . too late!!!

Situations such as what we are in are the result of millions of "little" mistakes and crimes that, in this case, put GW in the WH and placed the WRONG people in Congress.

So pointing fingers is BULLSHIT!

The real questions are what have we learned and what are we going to do about what we've learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. And the crazy thing about that is . . .
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:44 AM by patrice
There's no way of knowing that the "little" things that I did or didn't do are/were any less significant than the "bigger" things that others did or didn't do.

In the great scheme of things that add up to Change, if something is "little" and easily done, or not done, how does that compare to the "larger", much harder, things that other people are called to do or not do, sometimes in very destructive situations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. "My candidate made a mess but your candidate didn't clean it up so it's all his fault"
Who do you expect will clean up Hillary's messes if she wins the presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Actually... NOT.
Not anymore than it's Kennedy's war or Byrd's or Pat Leahy's or others who were passionately against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. Last I checked..
They aren't running for President Of The US...on a theme as THE ANTI WAR Candidate...with all his little followers repeating that HE was the ONLY one who didn't vote for the war....well..DUH! He was Not a US Senator at the time...Though since being in the Senate he has voted YES to ALL WAR FUNDING which would give ANYONE FAIR MINDED reason to believe ...IF he were in the US Senate at the time of vote he would have voted the same way Hillary did...Unless of course he just decided to go vacation like he did in Chicago! Obama has VOTED YES FOR THE IRAQU WAR!! The resolution was one thing ..but to give more money TO HALIBURTON knowingly is ANOTHER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Shh! Isn't it bad enough we've stopped
believing in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, and now you want to take away our Hope, as well as our belief in in Change and the New Politics?

Jeez! Times are tough. We need some feel-good rhetoric, not someone peeing on our parade with ugly realities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. haven't you heard...voting for more funding IS opposing the war. Duh. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is Bush's war. Let's remember that.
Some were too naive to call Bush on his bluff on the original resolution. The rest of the anti-war candidates didn't want our troops to be held hostage by the Chimperor, Obama and Clinton, included. Clinton just didn't have the clear judgement to begin with to understand that she was being lied to or even worse she was pandering to the blood thirsty for political support.

You are right about Kucinich though. He's the only one that has done this correct the whole way through.

Still doesn't change that this is Bush's war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Can't argue with that nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. Oh please, you can't be serious.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:29 AM by Pawel K
I'm hardly a Obama supporter but you are delusional if you are going to try and sit here and tell us, with a streight face, that Obama has as much responsibility for this war as Clinton.

Obama was against this war from the start. This was an unpopular but correct position at the time. You should be praising him for that, not pulling this bullshit. Was he wrong for voting for all that funding? Sure. As Clinton was wrong. And as Edwards was wrong. And as most of the demcrats in congress were wrong. But at least he was right when he was against this war from the start, unlike Clinton or Edwards.

Seriously, I used to think this kind of dishonesty was reserved for the right wing. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. Didn't Obama campaign for Senate on not going to fund the war?
I heard his website was scrubbed to remove that particular "campaign promise">
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. he did. said he would not have voted for funding. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. So it's not the first time a Candidate has promise something and not delivered
I can understand not delivering on getting a bill through after putting up a good fight. But all he had to do is vote no on this and he couldn't even keep that promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. Yes, But that was just to get elected. So it was OK to lie, according to Obama.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. Clinton voted for the war period. $2 Trillion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
30. The media has created a Fairy Tale about Obama's "anti-Iraq War" claims.
And ObamaNation's too besotted to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. I guess the more you repeat a lie the more it sitcks
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 04:28 PM by Pawel K
There was no fairytale, he was against this war from the start. You're doing a great job speading these lies. No matter how many times your people are proved wrong you keep repeating the same lies and eventually it starts sticking. You and everyone else doing this bullshit should be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. He wasn't aware he didn't vote "no"...That, or it's the Clenis' fault
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. Really? I could have sworn the IWR was the blank check Congress issued Junior
that Junior cashed. Hillary and Edwards both voted YES on the IWR while Obama was speaking out against the impending war at an anti-war rally in 2002.

Funding was a responsibility thrust upon Obama as a direct result of Hillary and Edwards giving Junior the green light.

Obama was right on the war in excruciating detail from the beginning, Hillary and Edwards dead wrong. And this is where judgment trumps so-called experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. so he funded the war because he was against it? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. he funded the war having assumed that responsibility from those that started the war
And that distinction resonates large regardless of the Clinton camp's nonstop campaign, and they thank you for your efforts at subterfuge here at DU, of mis/disinformation. And in that regard, carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Those people are fucking sick
no better than the right wing we have all fought so hard against. They spread these lies knowingly with no regrets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
42. Not any more he doesn't
DK is out.

I don't care how much war funding either of them voted for. I want to know what they will do once they're in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC