|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
pathansen (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:32 PM Original message |
Illinois Fed for Right to Life gave Obama 50% rating in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. They're not pro-choice. So his votes didn't make them happy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pathansen (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. 50% is a neutral rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
34. Not to me, it ain't. Half the time? Not acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:40 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Human Cloning Bill was on their legislative priority list for 2002. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. any org with "Right" and "Life" in their name are probably anti-choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. In context ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. What kind of explanation are you looking for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pathansen (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. It would seem that they would give him a 0% rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:28 PM Original message |
I suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. Voting "present" has the same effect as voting "no" and they must have taken this into account |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. perhaps he did not see the women of Illinois as prayerful enough. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
9. Would you care to explain the parts you cut out to DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. well if your going to fight back with facts then I am going to post this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. We know his overall record is pro-choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Obviously something that allowed him to get a 100 rating from Planned Parenthood in the same session |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. That doesn't cut it. This isn't what you folks have done with Hillary and Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. 100% ratings every year from NARAL and Planned Parenthood "don't cut it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Similar ratings didn't matter to Obamites for a year for Edwards and Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. So you're saying you're no better than them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pathansen (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Obama has gotten the only 50% rating. The other candidates always get 0% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. False. Illinois Right to Life did not score either Clinton or Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Clinton and Edwards always get/got 0% ratings from pro life groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pathansen (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. As I said above, all other Democratic Candidates have gotten 0% ratings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. Compare Obama's high rating with that of other Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pathansen (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. ??? They give Obama an above average rating for Right to Life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. Here's an explanation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I don't want to hear what his Chicago cronies are saying. Give us a real explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. So you deny that Hillary exploits Women's Rights? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Hillary's record is consistent on choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I said nothing of her record... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
18. I've seen it before. SB0493. Human Cloning Act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Obama voted against it. SB649 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Voted YES to SB0493 in the 01-02 session - that would effect his 2002 rating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. What explains St. Obama's change in position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. He didn't change position, he the Nay button on his desk by mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
20. K&R this should help him win back female voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC