Using long-term bonds to solve a short-term crisis is bad policy. Arnold promised he could balance the budget. His plan was to "open the books - audit everything." Let him keep his promise.
Going into long-term debt over this is NOT the solution.
Further, the Governator is getting all the adds for 57 and 58 paid for by big dirty money. Kind of makes you wonder why these guys are so keen to make the Governator look good. Either way, the mentality that raising taxes is somehow unamerican is rediculous. Sometimes you've got to give a little to get something in return.
3. What do you guys think about voting No on 57, Yes on 58?
I heard that they are tied together, one must pass for the other to pass...but is there any reason why voting yes on 58 alone would be an unwise thing to do?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.