Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 10:39 AM by Strawman
Who can make change happen on these issues we care about like health care? That's a good standard for evaluating these candidates. Whether that kind of legislative skill that was effective in Illinois: that brand of arm twisting and cajoling can work from the White House, I don't know. I'm sure each candidate can make a case that they will be the most effective at actually getting things accomplished. The next question is how do they do that? By watering down reform to the point that it is meaningless in order to pass it through Congress so they can claim an empty "bipartisan" accomplishment, or by demonstrating real political skill to achieve genuine progress?
|