Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The First Woman President Or a Third Term for Bill? Is this supposed to liberate women?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:26 PM
Original message
Poll question: The First Woman President Or a Third Term for Bill? Is this supposed to liberate women?
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 09:32 PM by FrenchieCat
I had always imagined that the first woman President would achieve that achievement based on her own distinct merits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. What, it won't be Hillary's third term?
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol
That is how Presidents have often been discussed in this country - the woman behind the man. Is the woman actually allowed to switch positions with the man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. uummm hmmmm
she better ask bill if they can trade places....with the woman behind the man......in the bedroom!!!lol

sorry couldnt resist. I know I know im so jeuvinile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. knotty
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're a team.
Always have been. He leaned on Hillary a lot when he was President and she would do the same if she wins. It's a package deal with the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Please
They barely spoke for almost two years. (can't blame her for that though)


She claims to know nothing about any of the pardons he dished out at the end of his second term, even though her brother was involved in some of them. Not much of a team player there.



He gave her the socialized medicine program, she failed miserably. After that she went sight seeing around the world on the taxpayer's dime.
Yes she met some interesting people when she traveled. I can't believe that they took her any more seriously than we would the wife of the Prime Minister of England.

She was, is, and always will be, Just Bill Clinton's Wife (that he cheated on)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. The 1st post-NV Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!! poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where's "A continuation of Corporate Rule?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Unfortunately, this is the problem I have with Senator Clinton.
I am having trouble believing that a new Clinton White House would be different from the old Clinton White House.
She should have run using her maiden name. She would have more credibility with me that way. I want a new fresh direction for America and our party. I am doubting that it will come with the Clinton's back in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. "She should have run using her maiden name. She would have more credibility with me that way. "
The nerve of feminists nowadays: taking the husband's surname.
:sarcasm:


Plenty of people would say that her husband is too weak if she doesn't take his surname. Is there a limit of one politician per couple?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. honest question on her name
I swear I heard "Hillary Rodham Clinton" early last year and then it changed to "Hillary Clinton" later on. I hope I'm wrong on that - and that may be the media's doing rather than anything to do with her or her campaign.

And, um, I'd be for that one per family limit (no Laura Bush for Senator please!) :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is what I call "looking a gift horse in the mouth". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't have a problem admitting i wish he'd get off her back. that being said...
i do believe she is winning on her own merits. she seems to do much better after debates, and those are all her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. But in the debate, she talks about how she's done stuff......
I'm just not sure if what she's done is really more than what Obama's done. It is the weight of her husband's job that allows her to get away with this mantra that she contineously speaks of in these debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. so that is why he was in the hotels that had caucuses today?
Winning on her own merits?

LOL


She is winning because she has a former president for an attack dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary would be nowhere in politics without Bill
The fact of the matter is without being married to Bill and getting all of the national attention from it Hillary would probably not stand much of a chance at the nomination. Instead she's basically inherited all of the pros and cons of Bill Clinton, and polls have consistently shown that among Hillary Clinton's supporters a large part of them (60% or more in NH I think) admit they would vote for Bill instead of Hillary if Bill was on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. Either choice in your header is fine by me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC