Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As I recall, the "Reagan Democrats" included a lot of blue collar, union types.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:37 PM
Original message
As I recall, the "Reagan Democrats" included a lot of blue collar, union types.
People who once had been part of the backbone of this party. Do we want them back with us, or not?

Much as it turned my stomach to hear the Obama quotes, I've been rethinking the issue. A lot of former Democrats voted for Reagan. Don't we want them back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. Better to steal the republicans' thunder now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. You recall correctly
Jim Webb is a good example of a Reagan Democrat. I think we should be looking for more votes, not less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reagan won those blue collar Dems using racism and misogyny
The blue collar Dems who voted for Reagan were social conservatives -- Catholics and right wing Christians -- who supported FDR's and LBJ's economic policies but not the social policies of civil rights for blacks, women and gays. They are best characterized by the TV sitcom character "Archie Bunker".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They Were Populists
Liberal on economic issues...Conservative or traditional on social issues but most of these people are gone now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Partly true
but don't you think we should try to get some votes based on economic issues? All long as Democrats are not using social issues to appeal to them, whats the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The Roosevelt Coalition Is Mostly Gone
My mom is going to be ninety, God bless her, she's one of the few people I know who actually voted for Roosevelt...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Some, yes, but not all
Assuming that they all switched to the vote for Reagan out of bigotry is an oversimplification of the political, economic and social dynamics that led to the shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Archie Bunker wouldn't vote for Obama or Clinton.
The Reagan Democrats who might, aren't the Archie Bunkers.

Or maybe even Archie Bunker would have learned something by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Apparently their association with Reagan and the Republicans makes them unclean...
No longer worthy of voting Dem.

I, for one, would love to have them back though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's just that there have been a number of slaps to the base...
He's pandered to fundies, insulted gays, trashed boomers ~ and now this.

Perhaps it's smart politics in some ways, but it's very disrespectful in others ~ I'm pretty angry with Obama right now, but time will tell. I think he needs to show somehow that he respects our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Obama takes the Dem base for granted just like the Clintons do
Both Obama and Hillary know that the Dem base will not vote Republican, so they don't need to address our issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's what it looks like...
But they'd both better be careful ~ today, I'd vote for an indie before either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I Agree.
Sad to say, they may ignore us right into writing in a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. You mean
he sponsored a bill to ban flag burning? Grandstanding on violent video games? Oh yeah, that was Hilary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That won't fly with me - I'm not a Hillary supporter...
He has fences to mend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. So...do we lie to them like Raygun did - then we screw them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. At what cost to civil rights would be my concern.
They left the Democratic Party.

The choice would be theirs and theirs alone I would hope.

It would not be my Democratic Party if they threw civil rights under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I remember when Howard Dean said he wanted the Confederate Decal crowd and when some blacks
objected, they were blasted out of the water by Dean supporters.

How is this any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Because the Confederate Decal crowd is specifically a racist group.
Reagan Democrats included some racists, but also many Jim Webb types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. But people here are arguing that the Reagan Democrats are all racists, too.
And saying they don't want them back. So, what's the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I disagree with those people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I do, too. I'm just trying to point out their inconsistency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. It is not any different.
Pandering to bigots of any flavor for votes is an acceptable Democratic Party agenda, IMO.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Not all Reagan Democrats were bigots.
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 04:21 PM by pnwmom
Any of them who would vote for Obama either wasn't a bigot or has evolved.

In fact, having a black candidate or a female candidate would be one way to filter out the racists or the misogynists from among the Reagan Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I agree.
People will vote their conscious regardless of whether "we", here on DU, welcome them or not.

I have no animosity for raygun Dems. Only for reagan politics. Democratic leaders should be proud of the Democratic Party platform and history. I'm sure they can speak to that and point out our many successes as the backbone of why people should vote Democratic. Pandering to bigots, right-wing libertarians, or selling out Americans for $ or power... well, I have a problem with that. That shows a lack of character.

I'm not taking sides here about Obama's remarks about raygun (whom I believe was as big a tragedy for america as bush*). I just don't believe the issue will be a big draw or turnoff for many voters.

What I find reprehensible are posters (not on this thread) who criticize DUers for their open hatred of raygun and use that to manipulate people into thinking that moving to the right and behaving civil with right wing piranhas will bring voters to the Democratic Party, I call BS on that. That happened on a thread last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. No, Dean said that he was going to be president of those that fly the Confederate flag
as well as those who don't. He didn't support their racism but as President wanted to get a civil dialog going about race. That's why the former black mayor of Atlanta, GA who endorsed Dean didn't have a problem with this statement by Dean.

Oddly, Al Sharpton hired a Republican campaign manager who engineered the attack on Dean over this issue. Al never challenged Dean on this comment until after Dean got the endorsement of Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr and other black leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Huh. A lot of them are gone.
Voting for Reagan went against their self interest. And a lot of those jobs are now gone.

But as long as we swallow the bait of "God, guns and gays" that the right wing throws out, we will continue to lose what's left of that bloc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think they came back already-disillusioned disenchanted, and poorer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Maybe so.
And if they did, they won't mind hearing the kinds of thing's Obama's been saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. such as? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Such as anything that will help them feel that they weren't complete idiots
for getting snookered by Reagan and his Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. YES. Rural PA area is a perfect example.
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 03:58 PM by sparosnare
Mostly it was over guns; that's why they went Republican with Reagan. So many of them have seen the light and are ready to be Democrats again. I will tell you though; they won't vote for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. They won't. But maybe their WIVES will.
Hillary carried NY with 75% of the women's vote because so many women in the red parts of the state voted for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. My mother won't and women her age won't. They don't trust Hillary.
That's the simple truth; it's a different atmosphere there than in NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I know MANY women ages 50 and up who would be happy to vote for
Clinton, if she's the nominee (even if they have another preferred candidate for the primary). In fact, older women are more likely to support her than younger women, probably because many of us identify with all that she's gone through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. Socially conservative, economically liberal
They'd fit in the "populist" part of those four-way political spectrum thingys you see posted here all the time. In a way, a lot of them are like Hubert Humphrey or Dennis Kucinich: quite culturally conservative on a lot of things, but in favor of New Deal/Great Society-type programs.

If they want in, I say let 'em. As long as they have a "live and let live" attitude toward some of the more liberal social issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. They were also the George Wallace Democrats
in our area, the Dems who were Reagan Democrats (blue collar labor) also voted heavily for George Wallace.

These are people who vote according to their prejudices and bigotry. The only way they'll support their own party is when they vote with their pocketbooks. It takes hard economic times to bring them around.

Its not up to us, its up to them. There's little any candidate can say to appeal to them without pandering to their bigoted view of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Maybe some history will help.....
Chisholm's base of support was ethnically diverse and included the National Organization for Women. Among the volunteers who were inspired by her campaign was Barbara Lee, who would go on to become a congresswoman some 25 years later. (Currently, Barbara Lee has a couple of pieces of legislation that would honor Shirley Chisholm, including H Con Res 9, calling on the US Postal Service to create a stamp honoring her, and HR 176, which would create a program to encourage educational exchanges between the US and Caribbean nations.) Chisholm said she ran for the office "in spite of hopeless odds, . . . to demonstrate the sheer will and refusal to accept the status quo."

Chisholm created controversy when she visited rival and ideological opposite George Wallace in the hospital soon after his shooting in May 1972, during the 1972 presidential primary campaign. Several years later, when Chisholm worked on a bill to give domestic workers the right to a minimum wage, Wallace got her the votes of enough southern congressmen to push the legislation through the House.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Chisholm

Was she pandering? Or, was she just being civil? Extending an olive branch so that they could work together regardless of other fights and get something good accomplished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. Oh, cmon, I was 18 years old and the economy sucked
I just wanted someone who wasn't using the word "malaise" to describe the electorate. Worst vote of my life as I learned very quickly to hate Reagan's guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC