How Will New Hampshire Recount Shake Out?

[liberalmike27]

I heard it started Wednesday. I wonder if they will finish it by the time a nominee is elected. I wonder if it'll be swept under the rug when it does, and dismissed. It would sure be nice if we could find out if manipulation went on before the election of our candidate. Will they just refeed the machines, as they did in Florida, and come up with the same flawed results, or will they count them by hand.

Let me just say, I don't think Hillary had anything in particular to do with it. But in light of the almost certainty of democrats being elected en masse this year, whoever does control the programming is trying to insert the most conservative candidate in Hillary.

[Silent3]

1. There are already results for my county, Hillsborough.

http://www.sos.nh.gov/recountresults.htm

There's very, very little difference between the hand counts and machine counts, way too small to make any difference in how the election came out, and small enough that the differences between machine and hand count might very well be due to a higher hand count error rate.

[ORDagnabbit]

2. dont listen to this man.....I think he hates the idea of democracy...

every vote is sacred or democracy is a sham. - cobb

15% differences (like ward 5) are not minor and not caused by the hand counting.


www.bradblog.com

Scores of Votes Mistallied for Every Democratic Candidate...
As mentioned last night in this disturbing article, the early results of the hand counts of one Diebold precinct in Dennis Kucinich's election contest in New Hampshire are now being posted, as they come in, at this New Hampshire SoS page.

As mentioned earlier today, NH SoS Bill Gardner told WMUR in NH that "We did nine of the 12 wards in Manchester, and a lot of the votes were exactly the same...Some went up by a vote or two." He didn't, of course, note that a lot of the vote counts (most of them) were off by 5 or more.

And now, the rest of the numbers from the rest of the Manchester wards are coming on. And get a load of Ward 5:

Diebold
Result Hand
Count
CLINTON 683 619
EDWARDS 255 217
OBAMA 404 365

[Silent3]

4. What the hell does what I posted have to do with hating democracy?

The stupid, needlessly inflammatory shoot-from-the-hip, quick-to-judge comments around here are way out of hand.

[ladjf]

3. A full recount would either show that the original counts were

accurate or that they weren't. Either way is a win.

[Pathwalker]

5. Hey, check this out: voting machine problems, R, SC:

Seems like there's voting machine problems in the Republican primary in South Carolina:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3147600

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: