Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay rights, New Democrats, and New Labour

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:08 PM
Original message
Gay rights, New Democrats, and New Labour
Tony Blair's New Labour rose at about the same time that Bill Clinton's New Democrats came to dominate the Democratic Party. Both groups advocate disregarding traditional liberal positions in order to win elections.

This is why Tony Blair and his New Labour supported the invasion of Iraq in the same way Al From and Bruce Reed of the DLC did the same in the US. The same similarities can be seen in the tepid defense both groups have given to full equality to GLBT persons.

In a nutshell, progressives in America find themselves in the same quandary the Labour backbenchers find themselves: dump Blair and risk a Tory victory, or keep Blair and continue the Torization of Labour.

Here is an article from the UK that takes aim at New Labour on the issue of gay marriage.

New Labour – same old story

New Labour in power

MANY PEOPLE expected New Labour to blaze a trail to redress the balance of government action in favour of working-class people and to counter the years of bigotry and reactionary ideology from the Tory era.

Certainly their acceptance of openly gay MPs and ministers represents a major change in government attitude but what matters more is their policy towards the rest of the gay population.

Instead of prosecuting their expressed intention to "end unfair discrimination" they have equivocated and delayed, at times even defending anti-gay policies.

http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/liberation/l2frame.htm?Labour.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought when I saw the post that DLC was the topic - not UK Labor :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. "New Democrats" == "Old Rockefeller Republicans" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's all help the right by dividing our vote so gays can have no rights
My choice for Kerry is that he DOES NOT ADVOCATE anything that goes against the equal protection laws..he therefore feels the courts will be forced, as they were with the Texas Sodomy laws to strike laws that specifically discriminate against gays.

Edwards on the other hand MADE NO mention of equal protection laws the other night in the debate.

Kucinich is noteworthy in this regard, however used his vote when it counted TO FUCKING VOTE FOR DOMA.

Dean favors civil unions not marriage.

Ralph sums the category up as gonadal politics when asked about women's reproductive rights although I have seen no recent statements on gay marriage,

Sharpton of course gave the best answer of all.

Back whn I came out, in spite of the HUGE gay population in my state, cops would walk into gay bars and arrest people on charges of LEWD conduct simply for dancing.

A few short years ago, California PASSED prop 22 defining marriage as a man and a woman.

Polls show more sympathy and support for civil unions, but are not coming along in the matter of marriage.

As LONG as I am NOT actively HARMED more which is the REAL POTENTIAL of all this derisiveness, I am OK getting the progress a piece at a time...going the RIGHT direction uis FAR MORE IMPORTANT to me than GOING BACKWARDS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Again I stress:
If Bush packs the courts with rightwing Falwellites, gays won't have any rights whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But even Clinton nominated Federalist Society members to the courts
What's the difference between an arch conservative and another non-liberal judge that belongs to the Federalist Society? None!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So how has Breyer voted when it counted on extending rights?
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 04:46 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
Texas?

Why all the 5-4 decisions with Breyer on the 4 SIDE?

It's very entertaining watching you trip all over your tongue with the most liberal Democrat to presumably get the nomination in 16 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kerry is not a liberal, he is a corporatist
Kerry was, or pretended to be a liberal 30 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Corporatist is a glittering generality which makes the person using the
term a propagandist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Kerry will not pull out of NAFTA or WTO
Kerry is therefore a corporatist that only pays lip service to the plight of American workers.

Replacing Bush with Kerry is mostly a personnel change with no substantive policy changes except at the margins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. What a total piece of bullshit propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Did he really?
Kucinich is noteworthy in this regard, however used his vote when it counted TO FUCKING VOTE FOR DOMA.

uh-oh

Thanks for that bit of info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. DOMA passed the House 342-67, and Clinton signed the bill
Cynthia McKinney voted against DOMA, Dick Gephardt voted for it!

Anti-Marriage Bill in Congress Passes House, Would Exclude Gay Spouses from Immigration
Grass Roots Campaign Defeats Anti-Marriage Backlash in 13 States
Trial in Hawaii Case Set For September

Many gays and lesbians were outraged and disappointed to find that some allies of the gay and lesbian community caved into pressure and voted for DOMA. These included David Bonior (D-MI), Connie Morella (D-MD), Steny Hoyer (D-MD), Steve Horn (R-CA), Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Nita Lowey (D-NY). Some congressional offices reported phone calls from angry constituents after the vote tally was announced. Trying to duck for cover and achieve what most gays and lesbians saw as a meaningless compromise, many of these "pro-gay" members voted first for an amendment offered by Barney Frank (D-MA) to gut the bill of its provision to redefine marriage for federal law. As predicted, the amendment failed by a wide margin and most of the legislators who had supported the amendment then voted for the final bill. Still on Monday morning, some legislative aides tried to put a positive spin on the vote, saying that the legislation "would have passed anyway" and that "at least" they supported the Frank amendment. Liberals Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) and Major Owens (D-NY) abstained by voting "present."

http://www.lgirtf.org/newsletters/Summer96/SU1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Cynthia McKinney. Done in By Her Own Party.
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 06:51 PM by David Zephyr
How disgraceful was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I understand Paul Wellstone voted for it too.
...but I am suprised that these Congresscritters did as they are in fairly safe seats (like Bonoir).

I guess, when push-comes-to-shove on gay issues the Democrats cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Not really. Kerry didn't vote for it. He called it GAYBASHING
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 07:30 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
and has indicated civil unions qualify for equal protection under the US constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. IndianaGreen and Nothingshocksmeanymore.
Perhaps the two brightest bulbs on the DU landscape...or is that cyberscape.

And two of the most decent people one could ever get to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC