Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh fuck. Obama's minister has really gone over the line now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:15 PM
Original message
Oh fuck. Obama's minister has really gone over the line now.
Obama's spiritual mentor
Powerhouse Chicago preacher draws attention, and plenty of controversy
By Michael Hill | Sun Reporter
January 16, 2008

CHICAGO - The packed house at Trinity United - some 3,000 in all - had been in the pews for almost two hours, energized by a 200-voice choir and a rousing dance performance Sunday, when the Rev. Jeremiah Wright stepped up to speak.

Wright is well-known in Chicago and in the black church world for taking over a small United Church of Christ congregation in 1972 and turning it into an 8,000-member powerhouse. More recently, his name has become familiar as the longtime spiritual mentor of Barack Obama, who joined the church in 1988 - a move Obama says was important to shaping his identity as an African-American.

<snip>

On Sunday morning - amid intensified crossfire between Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Obama over the use of race in the Democratic presidential campaign - Wright was preaching from the Gospel of John, using his powerful style to link the story of the loaves and fishes to a contemporary political message.

<snip>

Some argue that blacks should vote for Clinton "because her husband was good to us," he continued.

"That's not true," he thundered. "He did the same thing to us that he did to Monica Lewinsky."

<snip>

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/politics/bal-te.preacher16jan16,0,1629577.story?coll=bal_tab01_layout
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:17 PM
Original message
And how is that over the line? One might disagree with him, sure;
but how is it over the line?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. or untrue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tess99 Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, how is the good Rev. wrong?
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 03:20 PM by Tess99
All Clinton ever did do was throw us a bone. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. it's something that will NOT help Obama among
voters- saying that Clinton f***ed black people. That's the sort of thing that you don't say in a sermon in front of hundreds of people and the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tess99 Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I don't think it hurts at all
This idea that Clinton did oh so much for us po' black folk needs to be exposed for what it is, a lie. He did no more for blacks than he did Latinos or Asians or Women or Dominicans. So why do we call him the first black president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. It will hurt among white voters.
I wish it wouldn't but it will, and Obama needs white voters as well as people of color to win the nomination, and if nominated to win the presidency. You're just not looking realistically if you don't think that this is a liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tess99 Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
72. I don't get how this could possibly hurt him with white voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
85. You Know You Can't Talk About Race Among White Voters
Or else you are "racially divisive" and bring too much baggage :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. He shouldn't be talking politics from the pulpit at all..
not pushing for one candidate or another at least. I think this is bullshit whether it's a repuke or a Dem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
77. well, no one reported it
so I'm not sure how important this is.
Face it, to a majority of the electorate, if it's not on TV it never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. 8 years of Clinton prosperity: If all YOU got was a "bone" you have only yourselfto blame.
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. "He did the same thing to us that he did to Monica Lewinsky."
enjoyed a BJ?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. I think it may have been the other way around.
Most of us fell for the MSM giving us the same service that Monica gave BC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. got her a really cushy job
in Manhattan?

seems like Monica did ok for herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
88. maybe he was referring to the Cigar-treatment?
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 04:14 PM by JackORoses
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's Not Bring Ministers Into this...
that's repugnican garbage!

Ohh! my 500th post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I'd love for this not to be in the mix, but it is and sticking your head
in the sand is not a useful occupation. It's actually a pretty fair and well done article, but this is going to cause a stink. And it's in a major newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. This minister brought himselft in--alll by himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:28 PM
Original message
Amen. Where there's smoke there is fire.
This is raising a red flag to me about this church. I am not feeling good about it, and Obama's association with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Those preachers.....minds are always in the gutter.
That statement is, indeed, a bit much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. ..
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow. That was a horrible thing to say....
He should not be getting so involved with the campaign period.
But he does not need to trash the Clintons to speak well of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Agree with you on that.
There are enough good things to say about Obama. This reverand didn't need to wade in like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Obama's a good man. This guy isn't helping him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ouch, better he hadn't said that
although I do agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Seems inappropriate
Very crude church talk. And it seems he shouldn't be politicking from the pulpit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Sounds like he needs his tax exemption yanked
And I say that as someone who supports neither HRC nor BHO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. That's for sure
If I was a church-goer, I'd be very offended to hear political rhetoric from the pulpit. Not very Christian-like either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's pretty fucking ugly
Not going to help his candidate at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Using the pulpit to push a political candidate
Inappropriate, not to mention a cheap, unnecessary remark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. It's also illegal... but not Obama's fault
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Of course not.
It would only be the candidate's fault if the candidate were Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. ........
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
60. LOLLLL ... ain't that the truth!
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 03:39 PM by SaveOurDemocracy
The hypocrisy around here is mind-numbing.

edit for spelnig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
62. lol, was about to write that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
69. *rimshot*
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 03:46 PM by redqueen
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
110. be fair...
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 10:27 PM by Essene
(lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
96. This is illegal? I dont think so
Non-profits and religious groups have limits on political action, but they arent banned from making statements or even having a pastor show support for issues.

I dont think they can formally campaign, however, but nobody's gonna blame a church for being supportive of one of their damn members running for PRESIDENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
113. Not illegal
There's no law against political speech in a church. It only affects the church's not-for-profit status under the tax codes.

And this comment probably does not cross the line, believe it or not. A pastor can't explicitly urge their congregation to vote for or against a candidate of partisan political office. But they are allowed to step right up to the line - they can criticize candidates or praise candidates all they want, as long as they don't go the next step and specifically tell their congregations to vote for or against any particular candidate.

As controversial and offensive as Rev. Wright's comment may be to some, it is no doubt within the bounds of the regulations and wouldn't jeopardize the church's 501(c)(3) tax status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama's not responsible for what his minister says..
but I would say he needs to fire him as his "spiritual mentor".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. What is it with preachers? Do they ever think of anything but sex?
They need to get laid more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Well, at least he didn't compared him to Foley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. Nice anti-gay dig.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barb in Atl Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. ???
I thought Foley was a pedophile.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #54
73. He is. Dunno what's up with that comment above.
Maybe they were confused and thinking of the wide-stance guy? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Okay now THAT is going to be a problem.
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think Obama needs to have a chat with his pastor about keeping the campaign outside of church
Besides, it could get the church fined by the FEC, and possibly endanger their tax-exempt status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Boy, I bet Obama cringed when he heard that. I know I did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Its a non issue. Wasnt it before the truce?
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. Damn, that was tacky
We've had enough religion in politics and politics in religion for the last seven years. I was hoping with a Democrat we could put that behind us. That is the sort of comment I'd expect from the Family Values crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. As David Mamet says, "In aid of what?"
I just don't get the perceived upside of this stuff.

It is SO easy to boost Barack in a positive fashion.

But I think a lot of people have the same problem some people on DU have: a one-size-fits-all conception of opposition. A Manichean frame.

You get used to extremity in opposition to great evils, and then end up applying that approach to everything that gets in your sights.

The Clintons do currently stand between a black man and the White House, but not with fire-hoses and dogs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
86. your last line could be turned around to
"Obama does currently stand between a woman and the White House..."

These statements are really offensive, aren't they?

So please don't make them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. Why is a preacher talking about stuff like that?
They really are liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
84. He wanted to remind his parish of Bill's immorality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
35. Did he justify his inflammatory rhetoric in any way?
Like, maybe, mentioning the extreme racial disparity in our justice system that flourished under Clinton, and promoted by fueling the drug war while refusing to address the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity?

http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/usa/incarceration/
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2000/usa/
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2002/02/27/usdom3768.htm
http://www.blackcommentator.com/99/99_prisons_2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:29 PM
Original message
It doesn't matter. We live in soundbite nation.
this is what will be broadcast. and it is not helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. All pastors, ministers, clergy, should SHUT UP about politics and voting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. ohh no he di int
doh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama surrogates run amok. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
41. What's the problem?
It's the words of Obama's pastor, not Obama. I've been to plenty of Masses where I didn't like what the priest said; that didn't mean I abandoned my parish. If that is what you think Obama should do. And he doesn't have the responsibility of commenting on every single thing a supporter says. This is the media stirring up the pot of division once again.

Besides, Clinton DID screw over the poor with what he did to welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Thank you, some sanity on
this thread. Fuck the sound bytenation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. black people = poor. got it. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. As a person who was poor during the beginning of the Clinton presidency
...I'd say that the poor were helped by WJC, far more than the 12 previous years, and a damned sight more than the 7 since.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. Many people on welfare are black
It's a fact that derives from our country's racist history. To mess with welfare is to mess with the lives of poor people, many of whom are black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
107. Fact:
The majority of people who are on welfare are white. Look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. It looks like the minister stirring the pot of racial division again. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Under Clinton, the black unemployment rate dropped, as did the black crime rate,
and the black standard of living increased, as the black middle class expanded. Things were better for the black community under Clinton than they were under any President in decades, if ever.

Frankly, by choosing him as his pastor, Obama is declaring that he considers this man his spiritual and moral leader. I agree that Obama ought not be tarnished with this man's words, but if he doesn't draw a clear line between himself and his pastor, he likely will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
57. No, I don't think Obama should sever ties with his pastor
but he did condemn the comments made by him, and that's good. I've objected to prominent Clinton supporters talking trash about Obama, and sorry, though he may have had a point, the way he framed it is trash talk. And it will get picked up and picked over by the talking heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. I agree, if confronted about the comments
that Obama needs to speak up and separate himself from the comments. I knew even before Obama responded that he doesn't agree with the kind of comment the pastor made. It's this using of remarks made by anyone connected with a particular candidate as a way to attack the candidate that is wearisome and unproductive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
61. The problem is this was printed in a
well known newspaper. Obama can't be elected just by his hard line followers. People on the fence that are considering him read stuff like this and can be put off. This is why supporters should watch what they say. This kind of thing doesn't help Obama.

I also agree with others that a church pulpit is no place to talk politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
43. It's Sister Souljah time, Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
47. I read recently that Rev. Wright is retiring this year. Seems he wants to go out with a bang!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
49. Proposed Truce II: Let's agree that not all supporters are reading off talking points
I honestly believe that part of the reason Hillary has had more flaps like this is that her supporters are older.

John Lewis, Charlie Rangel, Bob Kerrey and Bob Johnson are old, established big-shots who say whatever they want to say.

But everyone has supporters who will say whatever the hell they feel like saying, and we all ought to stop thinking that every unfortunate word is read from a campaign script.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
52. That's disappointing, but why are reporters spying on Obama's church
Are they planted in any other candidate's church too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. He did the same thing to us that he did to Monica Lewinsky? He let you give him oral?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
56. Not cool, Pastor. But, you know, does Obama control his pastor?
Is Pastor Wright a surrogate for the Obama campaign? Nope. But Obama should say something here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Of course I know that, but it's
not about what I know. It's about this becoming fodder for the talking heads and for people who want to damage his candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
58. Here's Obama's response, from the link in your OP...
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 03:43 PM by flpoljunkie
In a statement released by his campaign last night, Obama responded to questions about Wright's comments on Sunday.

"As I've told Reverend Wright, personal attacks such as this have no place in this campaign or our politics, whether they're offered from a platform at a rally or the pulpit of a church," he said. "I don't think of the pastor of my church in political terms."

"Like a member of my own family, there are things he says at times with which I deeply disagree," he said. "But as he prepares to retire, that doesn't detract from my affection for Reverend Wright or appreciation for the good works he has done."

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/politics/bal-te.preacher16jan16,0,1629577.story?coll=bal_tab01_layout

(Notice that Obama does not throw Rev. Wright under the bus, like other unnamed politicians would.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. We really, really, really need to get religion out of politics.
It doesn't help ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. All of Democratic candidates believe in the separation of church and state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. I hope we get it back, because I'm real tired of all the religious stuff of the
last seven years. It's like being forced to endure Sunday school again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #58
74. "But as he prepares to retire..."
I'm glad Obama took him to task for this. Kind of a veiled "hurry up and retire old man" implication in the quote in my subject :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
66. That's going to hurt Obama's minister in the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. if you don't think that this couldn't hurt Obama
you aren't being realistic. I hope Obama's comments and repudiation of those remarks help defuse this, but it's something that does have the potential to hurt him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. that's kind of "below the belt" as it were
I'd laugh if it wasn't so unfunny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #67
76. Yeah, it's unfair to bring that back up.
:rof:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #76
82. Yeah, I didn't expect this issue to "pop up" at this time
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
78. Obama's response? Does anyone care?
As I've told Reverend Wright, personal attacks such as this have no place in this campaign or our politics, whether they're offered from a platform at a rally or the pulpit of a church," he said. "I don't think of the pastor of my church in political terms.

"Like a member of my own family, there are things he says at times with which I deeply disagree," he said. "But as he prepares to retire, that doesn't detract from my affection for Reverend Wright or appreciation for the good works he has done."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Of course people care
it's been posted several times, and it's my mistake that i didn't post it in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
79. Please explain how Bill Clinton got a blow-job from Black people. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. Monica as a victim
Interesting perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #83
95. NO NO. Obama's church affiliation isnt going to garner any attention.
(lol)

I gotta admit tho... the line was pretty funny. =D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
80. Clinton had a great record on black issues and Obama called Bill Clinton's policies progressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:12 PM
Original message
*insert something reasonable here while i try to stop laughing*
:banghead:

I guess all those people flaming me earlier today on threads about this church and pastor... calling me a bigot for even daring to suggest this could be a problem... will just keep flaming me. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
87. Oh, Snap! I wondered when Lewinsky would make her entrance.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 04:15 PM by JackORoses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
89. Well, Cali--I agree--the little minister is over the line: He did the same thing to us that he did t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
90. I still have a problem with ministers being involved in politics from the pulpit anyway. Besides
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 05:12 PM by EV_Ares
that what he said was a little too far out there for me. Maybe for others not, he is just saying for whatever reason Clinton screwed them which I have no idea what he is referring to. I didn't think Clinton's welfare policies were that much of a disaster but maybe they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. Maybe the Rev is talkin' about this..
"Mr. Clinton’s controversial end-of-term pardons—including a major drug "kingpin"—illustrate the inconsistency between Mr. Clinton’s rhetoric and his actions, according to one of the report’s authors. The Justice Policy Foundation launched a campaign to win pardons or clemency for 1,000 non-violent drug offenders on whom they had detailed research and information supporting their appeals, according to Jason Ziedenberg, co-author of the JPI report. Only 17 persons on that list were among the more than 400 last-minute pardons issued by Mr. Clinton."

http://www.finalcall.com/national/incarceration03-06-2001.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
91. Jeez - and here I thought it was a mayonnaise stain on my blue dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
93. Yet another example of how Christianity has been bastardized...
REAL Christians would never say something so vile, especially not a pastor!! And most certainly not a pastor in front of his congregation, et al.

I heard Obama say just yesterday that his supporters sometimes get out of hand and say things he would never say... I'm betting this is one of those times;)

I'm ready to cast my vote for the first candidate who comes out and says, without qualification, that religion will have no part in their administration. Or that they are an Agnostic or Atheist, that works too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
94. "He did the same thing to us that he did to Monica Lewinsky."
Oh really? Then I want my blue stained dress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. and we didnt get to see the Oval Office (or a cigar)
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 09:49 PM by Essene
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
98. It is so funny to watch you guys justify every ugly thing the Obama campaign does.
you would have swallowed your tongues by now in your frenzy to attack Clinton had her minister said something that totally disgusting.

Watch: Obama will let it just be said with no commment. And then in a week after the damage is done, say something like: yeah it was wrong.

Double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. Obama has nothing to do with this, IMO. He can't be held
responsible for the words and actions of others. Unless he's psychic how could he possibly know the intentions of others? He's running a campaign not a Nazi camp. (These same sentiments apply to any one of the other candidates).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Riiiggghht. Obama never is responsible when his campaign does something
You guys sure shouted a different tune with Cuomo said something about shucking and jivying. Supporter, not on the campaign.

Double standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #102
106. All this negativity will be great fodder for the repubs come the
general election. I wish all of the candidates would remember that. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #102
109. I respect this skepticism... but clearly obama and his pastor dont share the same general msg (lol)
His own church's message about black power and semi-separatism is most certianly not obama's message.

Hence, equating this with his "campaign" is honestly a stretch... but it makes no practical difference since this may as well BE his campaign in terms of the implications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #98
104. Check out some of the previous posts.
Obama did comment on what the pastor said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
99. That kind of preaching to me should lose him his churches
tax exempt status. I have no favourite in this race (being Canadian) but there should be a separation of church and state. I thought the republican religious politicos were the only ones that engage in this kind of crap...shame on some of these dems!:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
100. ROFLMAO....Billo Big Dawg Fucked them too???????? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
103. cali,
This the tragedy of Hillary's run: Monica is never going to go away. And we are tip toeing around it here and yet, in the General Election, that luxury will not be afforded us.

I agree that he shouldn't have said it, but for us to pretend that it is not going to come up is a recipe for suicide.

I just hope that someone buys Monica a house in Europe and keeps her there all of 2008. Still, I know that Linda Tripp, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers and all the videotapes are being pulled off the shelf for continuous loopin this summer.

This was small potatos to what will come. It's not fair, but that's the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. Well they can bring it on!
I guess they forgot Clinton's approval ratings during this fiasco?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
108. The Clenis had consensual sex with black people as a whole?
A minister really should be able to use a metaphor a bit more clearly. But I fail to see what qualifies clumsy language as "over the line."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
111. AND THAT is why he's the first black president...
You heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
112. He Doesn't Need That Many Interns
Didn't Lewinsky get her own HBO special?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC