Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA made a STUPID COMMENT today that will haunt him in the general election if he wins the nom

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:43 PM
Original message
OBAMA made a STUPID COMMENT today that will haunt him in the general election if he wins the nom
In other words, Obama is running as a figurehead who can give a good speech but will leave the hard stuff like running the government to people "smarter than him."

He's going to wish he never said this if he faces McCain in the general election. You can see the republican attack ads coming a mile away.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/

*** We wonder if this will come up at the debate: “Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama freely admits he doesn’t have the experience to run a bureaucracy. But he’s banking on the fact voters aren’t looking for a ‘chief operating officer’ in this election. ‘I have a pretty good sense of my strengths and my weaknesses,’ he said today during a meeting with the Reno Gazette-Journal editorial board. ‘I am very good at teasing out from people who are smarter than me what the issues are and how we resolve them,’ he said. ‘I don’t think there is anybody in this race who can inspire the American people better than I can. And I don’t think there is anybody in this race who can bridge differences ... better than I cann. But I’m not an operating officer. Some in this debate around experience seem to think the job of the president is to go in and run some bureaucracy. Well, that’s not my job. My job is to set a vision of “here’s where the bureaucracy needs to go.”’”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. ALL presidents should do that.
:shrug:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah..we can all see how great that has been working out with Chimpy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. If he had run a campaign in 2000 saying he wanted to be The Decider...
he would have finished 4th, right behind Buchanan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
72. I meant that presidents should aim to be bureaucrats instead of CEOs.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 06:38 AM by rocknation
"Bureaucracy" is a four-letter word because it tends to LACK the right kind vision and direction. It doesn't HAVE to be that way.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. What large organization has McCain ever run?
When was he a CEO of anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. On the other hand, the last time Hillary was chairperson of something it was of the Young Reps...
McCain would make an issue of his experience....and he would likely use some of Hillary's speeches on experience to illustrate his point that experience is important....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. OH PLEASE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. sounds like he is not making any huge faux pas here - bush has cheney to run the bureaucracy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
68. IOKIYAR
Media holds Democratic candidates to a much higher standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why am I not surprised that you have a Hillary avatar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:47 PM
Original message
which does NOTHING to address the point..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Why are you shooting the messenger?--it is Obama's that are the problem!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. yeah thats a smart move
a president should be smart, but he cannot be an expert in all fields. The president should share and direct the vision of american, while he has at his beck and call the most qualified people in their fields (not cronies you owe a job too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is absolutely right
Maybe if you understood exactly what it is the President does and the limits of his power you'd see that.

And first read completely put words in his mouth. When did he say he didn't have the experience to run a buereaucracy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. NO WONDER HE IS SO VAGUE SO OFTEN: "My job is to set a vision"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. The President's job is to create the blueprint
Not build the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. yeah--we hear a lot from Bush regarding blueprints. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. You fail at logic
Because one person failed to live up to a promise does not mean others will fail to live up to that same promise.

They have no effect on one another.

Word of advice: Never take the LSAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. It is sooo much better to bring your husband with you to get the job
that you are elected to do as the first woman President. How liberating, NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I want competent grown ups to lead us
not american idol candidates that inspire. If you are so desperate for inspiration, i suggest you watch oprah or dr. phil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Obama hides behind Michelle so much I wonder who the candidate is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. I heard that she was the one
who allowed him to be a Community Organizer, run for the IL Senate, etc....because she was bringing home $300,000/yr. He didn't have to worry about supporting a family.

I just don't trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. To use your craven logic....Obama would not have had to work at all!
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 08:24 PM by earthlover
But instead he dedicated himself to community service and social justice.

It is a sad day when democrats pooh-pooh social justice. A very sad day.

I might add that Hillary has always...er...been...er....comfortable. When did SHE devote herself to social justice on the streets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. I wasn't talking to you.
And with that lovely Ignore button, I never will have to again!

If Michelle hadn't had the big $ job, he wouldn't have been able to. He got himself a Sugar Momma!

And now I don't have to read your response!!!! Rib removal could be the answer you're looking for....it's the way to world peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. Check your timelines - he was a community organizer before he met Michelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gary Hart says Obama is the consumate policy wonk
I heard him today talking about Obama on the radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. This is reassuring. After suffering under the Chimp, I want a wonk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. We see how bureaucracy has worked out so well in this admin:
DHS, FEMA, 9/11 Commission, ad nauseum. Has anything really been accomplished? Give me someone who surrounds himself with very smart people and wants to get something done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Invidious Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. I actually PREFER a President that can
admit that he is NOT an expert at all things and is not afraid to bring in smart people to help him. How is that a bad thing to admit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. What bureaucracy has Hillary run? Or Edwards?
By your standards, NONE of the top three should be president.

BTW, elected officials make lousy bureaucrats. The smart ones HIRE good administrators.

(speaking as a one-time bureaucrat myself)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. well, there might be this stuff:
Clinton co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children's Defense Fund, in 1977. Then President Jimmy Carter (for whom she had done 1976 campaign coordination work in Indiana) appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation, and she served in that capacity from 1978 through the end of 1981. For much of that time she served as the chair of that board, the first woman to do so. During her time as chair, funding for the Corporation was expanded from $90 million to $300 million, and she successfully battled against President Ronald Reagan's initial attempts to reduce the funding and change the nature of the organization. She was also appointed Chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee the same year, where she successfully obtained federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas' poorest areas without affecting doctors' fees.

She also chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee from 1982 to 1992, where she sought to bring about reform in the state's court-sanctioned public education system. During this time she fought a prolonged but ultimately successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association -- the all powerful Arkansas Education Association -- to put mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size in place.

In the White House she was the major force behind the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 1997, a federal effort that provided state support for children whose parents were unable to provide them with health coverage, successfully increasing research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health.

With the above snippets from an impressive resume, I have no doubt Hillary will do more than just "provide the vision" or whatever it was Obama said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. That still ain't government
Unless you've actually worked in the government (more specifically, the executive branch of government), you never really know what you're dealing with. It's a whole new level of stupid.

Smart elected officials hire bureaucrats to run things. The dumb ones try to become it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. oh man, I'm going to have to learn to spin my head a new way
to wrap it around what you just wrote.

Chairing a State or Federal Committee and successfully jumping through the necessary legislative hoops to drastically increase funding for Government run programs like health care and education doesn't, um, give one an idea of what one is working ... with ... in government?

:eyes:

Okay. I'll just let you enjoy your nice little bubble for a while.

Meanwhile back in the real world ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. I am serious. Chairng a committee is not the same as being Secretary of ______________
A legislative committee is definitely not the same thing as the Department of Health and Human Services or some other executive branch cabinet-level department. It makes the most byzantine fortune 500 company look like a lemonade stand by comparison.

An exectuve-level department has literally tens of thousands of people working for it, laboring under a very complex set of rules and regulations to deliver services. A committee may have a staff of a hundred and does not have to operate under a maze of laws, many often contradictory-- not to mention unfunded legislative mandates (I won't even get into those...)

I've seen former legislators all too often come into an executive-level department, thinking that because they wrote some policy they know how to manage a bureaucracy. Unfortunately for them, they are often in for a very rude awakening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. that's a very good point
thank you for explaining what you meant.

I still believe -- comparing Obama's experience to Hillary's -- that she comes out on top, but I do appreciate you taking the time to clarify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Government is like sausage
It's disgusting to watch, but tastes okay once it's done.

Our candidates are thankfully smart enough to hire good administrators-- people that are good at dealing with bureaucrats and know how to make sure policy gets executed properly.

The only reason I say this is that when I worked in government I had the (dis)pleasure of working for ex-legislators who were very good at creating policy, but were really reeeaaally terrible at carrying it out once it got made into law. Conversely, I also worked for a guy who ran for office unsuccessfully many times but who was a really good administrator.

Thankfully, most of the bad ones went on to become lobbyists. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I couldn't help recalling hearing Bush saying that exact same thing...
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 07:50 PM by redqueen
didn't seem to hurt him too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. It is a stupid remark. Yes, Bush (and Reagan) were like this - BUT
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 07:52 PM by smalll
Reagan never came out and SAID this kind of thing. Everyone knew that "The Great Communicator" (Ronnie) was also a "Great Delegator" - but he never came out and said that about himself.

Also, I find this part of it: "I don’t think there is anybody in this race who can inspire the American people better than I can" a real turn-off. Sure, he can give a good speech; but you're not supposed to SAY "I can give a good speech." Can you imagine Romney actually saying to his fellow-Repubs, "I'm the hottest candidate we have by far, the best-looking, I have more hair than all the rest of them put together."??? Sure, hotness helps, but you're not supposed to proclaim your own hotness.

Guess this is what comes from inexperience. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. too early for him to be bragging about inspiring people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. damn, I bet you're CONCERNED about that....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. And does Edward? or Hillary except by proxy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. And heres the list of companies Hillary has run...
oh wait, never mind. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Google can be your friend, if you try a little:
Clinton co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children's Defense Fund, in 1977. Then President Jimmy Carter (for whom she had done 1976 campaign coordination work in Indiana) appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation, and she served in that capacity from 1978 through the end of 1981. For much of that time she served as the chair of that board, the first woman to do so. During her time as chair, funding for the Corporation was expanded from $90 million to $300 million, and she successfully battled against President Ronald Reagan's initial attempts to reduce the funding and change the nature of the organization. She was also appointed Chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee the same year, where she successfully obtained federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas' poorest areas without affecting doctors' fees.

She also chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee from 1982 to 1992, where she sought to bring about reform in the state's court-sanctioned public education system. During this time she fought a prolonged but ultimately successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association -- the all powerful Arkansas Education Association -- to put mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size in place.

In the White House she was the major force behind the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 1997, a federal effort that provided state support for children whose parents were unable to provide them with health coverage, successfully increasing research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health.

...

not exactly the thin resume you were smugly hoping for, was it

now how does Obama compare to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. chairing a committee is not exactly running a company.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 08:09 PM by bunnies
Nice try though.

and on edit: a seat on wal-marts board doesnt mean she ran wal-mart either. I notice you left that out though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Chairing a State or Federal committee
that successfully navigates the legislative hoops and bipartisan hills and valleys to effectively increase funding for important programs like health care and education which actually HELP people -- as opposed to making a pretty speech that inspires but has no meat and no follow-through -- is nothing to sneeze at.

Now, again, what has Obama done that's close to being comparable on a Federal or even a State Level?

Zilch. Zip. Na-da.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #40
52. Now you want to qualify business experience on a federal or state level?
If you recall, the topic of our conversation was running a company. So if Im to believe you havent changed topics - then according to your definition - Bill Gates would have zero business experience. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. from the OP
Obama will "leave the hard stuff like running the government to people "smarter than him."

Running the government sounds like, well, running the government, not a business. I know other Posters were talking about government as business and you added your apparently uneducated voice wondering what Hillary has run. I offered her resume showing her experience in successfully running Government committees and now you're claiming I'm changing the subject.

I still have no idea how Obama's experience compares to Hillary's, but maybe someday someone will politely, respectfully let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. My "apparently uneducated voice"?
Im not interested in playing the insult game. If thats your idea of polite and respectful, Im not interested. All set. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. I apologize. I should have clarified that you seemed to be
apparently uneducated about Hillary's resume, not in general. I have no doubt you have a fine education, but are perhaps slightly unaware -- as most are -- of what Hillary has actually done the last 35 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. I appreciate that. Thank you for clarifying.
As you may know, I am no fan of Hillary Clinton. Its not my intention, however, to discount any of her accomplishments. I think the petty tit-for-tat of late has made me especially bitter and more inclined toward knee-jerk reactions. I will conceded to you that HRC has more experience than Obama running governmental programs.

And I apologize if I behaved like an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. no apology necessary
I think we both had a slight brush with that asshole mantle. :eyes:

So, spit and shake hands? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
64. BOD of Wal-Mart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't think a statement like that would bother most people.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. LOL!
Thanks for the humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. "My job is to set a vision of “here’s where the bureaucracy needs to go.”’”
Actually, I think that's exactly right!
<><><>

These bumper stickers, t-shirts & more at: http://www.cafepress.com/powerboutique GET OUT THE VOTE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Keith Olbermann is talking about this right now, just read the statement. nt
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 08:11 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's a "stupid comment" if you're a Hillary shill
Bush bragged that he could be a CEO President and we've seen where that's gone.

I get the feeling that Obama's comments are just over the head for some people, namely Hillary supporters who have been predictably analyzed as less educated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. He's right.
The presidency is not a management position. It's a visionary position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. oh Herman, Herman, Herman
I guess I should have known it wouldn't be anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
41. It is about LEADERSHIP! The OP misses the point
Obama says he will surround himself with people smarter than him and the OP tries to be the snark. Sorry, wrong on more than one count!

For one, it is an effective tactic to humble oneself....I have made a career in sales and I can tell you that this is effective. Second, you seem to imply that if Obama is not the smartest of his cabinet it refects negatively on Obama. The goal is not to be the smartest (Einstein never was our president) but to be a leader and to channel the smartest people into bettering our government. If you think of it as MR SMART surrounded by lesser minds, I think you see a recipe for failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'm surprised he said this
Because it fits in with the way Hillary portrays him.

The person in charge has to be in charge. Otherwise, everybody underneath competes and back stabs each other to get control of the boss. A president can't be completely reliant on advice because everybody will give him different advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
46. VISION is essential...
It's easy enough to find talented Americans to help make that vision a reality.
<>

GET OUT THE VOTE! <http://www.cafepress.com/powerboutique>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
47. So as we have known all along, he is flash and dash, and
can baffle one with his bullshit and dazzle you with his brillance....We do not need a carney showman that might be best suited to guess how much someone weighs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
48. Maybe he could be our National Cheerleader and let
the adults do the work of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
50. I am not an Obama supporter but I don't
see how this is a bad statement for him to make. No President knows everything. The ones who think they do are the ones who get us in the big messes. Presidents should appoint cabinet members who are more knowledgeable than them in different areas and then LISTEN to them. I don't really think there are too many voters who expect a President to be an expert in military issues, economy, education, etc. You delegate those duties to a good qualified person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
53. OOOOOOHHHHH My ....
‘I am very good at teasing out from people who are smarter than me what the issues are and how we resolve them,’ he said. ‘ TEASE??? What>>?? TEASE??? NO-bama!:crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
54. WTF? COO is EXACTLY what people want in the next president, to clean up Idiot Admin mess
Foolish way to go at the experience issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
58. lol, "smarter than me"? no: *I*
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 08:50 PM by annie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
59. at least he is honest about it. 7 pts nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
67. haha, keep trying. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
69. Good for him. Look what two terms of the corporate presidency cost us.
I don't want another MBA running the country. CEO President was the sales pitch for the Bush presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
70. Hillary attacking him now for taking the Bush hands-off approach governing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
71. Quite right. He describes quite well the difference between a CEO and a COO.
There are very different skill sets needed in those two jobs. The US government doesn't really have a "COO" job, that being divided among the cabinet secretaries, military chiefs of staff, and president's chief of staff. But there's no doubt that the president's job is analogous to a company's CEO.

One of the things I've noticed about Obama is that it is often his critics who do best at selling him.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
73. I don't hire people to "inspire" me, I hire them to fix the goddam problem.(eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
74. And someone made a STUPID POST. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
75. maybe this is WHY he lost his State Senate records of 8 TEARS...
NONE...NADA...!

WHERE is Obamas Records during his time in Senate?
While in State government here in Illinois, Barack was known as a "nice guy," but has little to show for his years in state government. He was never particularly known
by the public at large as a vocal leader and was rarely out in front of any issue.

In fact, few Illinoisans even knew his name at all until he ran for the Senate seat against
Alan Keyes. He was an unknown, a non-entity as far as state politics was concerned.


Yet, the Obama camp has made no effort to assist investigators to look into his state records. In fact, Senator Obama has blithely claimed that his records have been

thrown out. Chicago columnist Lynn Sweet reports that Obama, who has called for "transparency in government" from his rivals, is not much interested in revealing his own documents.:wtf:



"I was in the state Senate for eight years," Obama said. "I had one staff person, that was what was allocated. I don't have archivists in the state Senate. I don't have

the Barack Obama State Senate Library available to me, so we had a bunch of file cabinets. I do not have a whole bunch of records from those years.:wtf: Now, if there are

particular documents that you are interested in, then you should let us know...As I said, I didn't have the resources to ensure that all this stuff was archived in some way...

it could have been thrown out.":rofl:...it could have been thrown out.:rofl:"it could have been thrown out.:rofl:"it could have been thrown out.:rofl....translation...NO-bama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
76. Plus I don't think the speeches are all THAT great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC