Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats on the Nevada Ballot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:38 PM
Original message
Democrats on the Nevada Ballot
Biden, Caligiuri, Capalbo, Clinton, Crow, Dodd, Edwards, Gravel, Hewes, Hughes, DR Hunter, Keefe, Killeen, Koos, Kucinich, LaMagna, Laughlin, Obama, Richardson, Savior, Skok.

21 candidates.

For those who argue that ALL candidates should be included in the debates, should all of these people be included? And don't you think that if were known you could get on national television just by filing, there would be hundreds or thousands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it a caucus like Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:43 PM
Original message
yes
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 09:43 PM by MonkeyFunk
but there are "approved" candidates. "On the ballot" is shorthand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. What do you mean by "approved"?
It's a caucus. If I want to caucus for Richard Nixon, I can do so. And if my caucus is viable, I get a delegate. Nobody has to "approve" anything, if I have the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's not Karen Hughes, is it?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL
let's hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Savior?
Uh oh. We're in trouble, I think!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yup!
Ole Savior!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. More dirty campaign tricks by the Clintons.
This is obviously a Reid-engineered attempt to split Obama's vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anything that gets him press seems to be ok with his supporters.
Campaigning in Michigan, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did they ALL get the SAME invitation that got DK his day in court?
if not, you post is irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's kind of mean when one Monkey tells another they are irrelevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. NOT directed at Monkey_Funk personally .. just his post.
But your point is quite funny, I'll give you that, if not entirely accurate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. goes somewhat like this ...


sometimes they sling poo.
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes they did...then NBC changed the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That is not my understanding at all
I saw somewhere (I'll dig it up yet .. arghh} that there were four invitations initially, and then
three (excluding DK).

Are you seriously claiming that it was otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. My mistake
I cannot read tonight...I thought you were asking the question about the national candidates. I missed that you were asking about all the minor candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. no problemo.
thanx for clarifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I'm not arguing
about the details of the Kucinich invite/disinvite, because I don't know them. I only know what Kucinich has said about it.

Regardless of that, many here argue that ALL the candidates should be included. I'm trying to point out that there is ALWAYS a line that's drawn, and the discussion is over where that line should be, not whether it should exist at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes. There's always a line drawn, and some will be "offended" no matter what
but Dennis was issued a formal invitation to the debate, which was abruptly snatched back out of his hand at the last
minute; which in my book is really poor form and reeks of favoritism and inside maneuvering by Clinton, Reid, et. al.

Thanks for clarifying the intent of your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Didn't LaMagna drop out.
I'm SHOCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. yes, that's what I've heard
So sad. The media shut him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC