Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abrams, MSNBC on-air: "D.C. media" invented Democratic race war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:14 PM
Original message
Abrams, MSNBC on-air: "D.C. media" invented Democratic race war
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 PM by DeepModem Mom
Dan Abrams blames "race-baiting, gotcha politics" on the part of the press for creation of the Democratic race war story. Quotes have been taken out of context by the press, he says, in order to create a story. He said the press is not interested in stories based on issues -- the economy, for example -- so they create stories of conflict, stories like this one.

Abrams showed video of Bill Clinton's entire "fairy tale" comment, making it clear that the remark was about Obama's early Iraq stand, not his campaign. In the atmosphere, created by the press, that followed, he said Hillary's comment about Martin Luther King was "misinterpreted." What she said was that Presidents must implement policy. (Craig Crawford just said to another commentator, "Do you think Hillary Clinton is so dumb that she would denigrate Martin Luther King" before the South Carolina primary?)

Abrams said Robert Johnson's comments referencing Obama's youthful drug use were "ill advised" -- but not the comments of "a part of Clinton's campaign."

He accused the press of creating a story for its own use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. And now they're all hollering at each other.
Craig Crawford is about to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was trying to get Abrams' comments into type, and couldn't listen as closely...
as I would have liked to the conversation that followed. I DID hear Craig Crawford, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks very much for the details as I am not able to watch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anything to avoid talking about real issues.
Real issues are boring and depressing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I forgot! That's what Abrams said at the beginning. Like the economy. Thank you!
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 09:32 PM by DeepModem Mom
I edited that point into the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. And the campaigns react as if on cue. First from Novak's column... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. thanks for the info.
sanity...yeah..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, if the m$$$m started it then
Obama finished it with a Class Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No he didn't. He let the distortions( per Abrams) stew
No high road there. None. Zip. Nada

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Lying again to prop up hillary cause
her fans are helping her so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Dan Abrams said all the suckers got played by the media.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 10:05 PM by durrrty libby
He's right. The media takes things out of context and all the clowns

with no comprehension skills lap it up:dunce: :dunce: :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. the more I see Dan Abrams the more I like him nt
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 09:33 PM by comradebillyboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. He had definitely gotten on the ball lately!
His dad, Floyd Abrams is a highly respected Constitutional Lawyer. I expect he is pleased to see his kid doing this instead of the police blotter beat..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think there's some truth in that - but MSNBC has been guilty too
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 10:03 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
I think the networks in their program development meetings among executives most likely discuss their desire to inject drama and conflict into their news coverage. This is mainly infotainment in this day and age, after all. It boosts ratings by promoting controversy. They want a boxing match. It might be one of the principal reasons they have tried to exclude some of the candidates like Kucinich because they don't want to dilute the back and forth aggression by having someone actually address issues.

But I don't like the way Abrams cut off mention of any other examples of the ugly commentary that has gone on in the respective campaigns. He tried to frame the exact debate he wanted to stage, regarding race, and exclude all other references. The media has been doing this out-of-context sound bite coverage with incident-after-incident, not only with regard to the Martin Luther King and "fairy tale" comments but with many others. The list is getting long.

Abrams is not accusing the media of being racist. He's saying they are exploiting race to promote conflict, which raises viewership. But he then excludes all talk about other incidents, such as references by the Clinton campaign to Obama's drug use or his alleged Islamic ties. If Abrams really believed that this was the media attempt to just promote conflict, then he would entertain discussion about other incidents. By framing the issue so tightly with regard to race, Abrams is himself making race the issue. The issue for the media is not race, it's getting our blood up in order to increase ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Indeed, it is a much larger problem than this particular story.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 10:15 PM by DeepModem Mom
The media does want a horse race, a conflict, whatever -- even if to the detriment of the democratic process, which they are supposed to have a part in in our system. The Founders gave them special protection -- they're supposed to inform the citizenry.

Thanks for your post! As I read it, my mind kept clicking, "Tweety, Tweety..." He's at the forefront of this kind of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. I watched that -
and how they went on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.

BTW - how are those ratings there Dan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Dan was great. The truth is a beautiful thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Just noting that Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski were fanning the racial flames again this a.m.
on MSNBC, in interviews with Senator McCaskill and Mike Barnicle (they both tried to steer the talk in a different direction).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
19. Dan Abrams has been great lately.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Except when he's reporting "news" from unsourced gossip columns...
...that just happen to be owned by Murdoch...without fact-checking and learning that the said "news" has already been thoroughly debunked.

Yeah...he's a great "reporter". :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank goodness for Dan Abrams!!!
He and KO are the only two that I can tolerate from MSNBC. They have become worse than FOX. You know that Tweety has finally lost it when O"Reilly, of all people, sticks up for Hillary and says that in years past Matthews would have been fired for his constant biased attacks on Hillary (he was referring specifically to Tweety's comments about hillary becoming a senator thanks to Bill's cheating).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC