Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CLINTON-ENDORSING UNION TRIES TO DEPRESS CAUCUS TURN-OUT IN NEVADA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:10 PM
Original message
CLINTON-ENDORSING UNION TRIES TO DEPRESS CAUCUS TURN-OUT IN NEVADA
Ugly stuff going on in Nevada: The state teachers union (an affiliate of the Hillary Clinton-endorsing National Education Association) has filed a lawsuit to shut down planned provisional caucus locations on the Las Vegas strip during the Jan. 19 election.

The sites would allow strip workers -- many of them women, people of color, and members of the Culinary Union, which endorsed Barack Obama -- to caucus close to work, and hopefully prevent some of the large-scale disenfranchisement of working class people that takes place during the Iowa caucuses.

For more, check out coverage from the Las Vegas Sun. They quote the Obama campaign as criticizing the lawsuit, and the Clinton campaign as saying, it's "not for us to decide. We just want the process to be fair."

A fair process means encouraging voter turn-out. That was the case when it came to young voters in Iowa, and it's the case when it comes to union members in Nevada. Clinton's rhetoric on voting rights has been less than progressive this primary season.

---EOE---

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=01&year=2008&base_name=clintonendorsing_union_tries_t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're trying to get equal representation for all professions and people. Right is right.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. that is bullshit. they are trying to take some people's votes away
ask yourself a simple question.
If this lawsuit is successful, will less people be able to participate in the Caucus?
If your answer is yes, then this is nothing other than voter suppression.

If this is really about equal representation,
Why aren't they suing to create more at-large Caucus locations, instead of suing to eliminate the ones that already exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton has egg on her face over this ...teacher's have Saturday off and can caucus
casino workers can't leave work on Saturday to go caucus. Harry Reid came up with this idea and now he is being silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That isn't true. There are teachers and janitors working that day. In fact at the caucus. If it isn'
their precinct they are not being allowed to vote themselves. Unlike the casino workers. Also there are doctors, nurses, many other who work Saturday who aren't being accommodated. The lawsuit has been posted several times, and is a good source to clear many of these misconceptions up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The teachers have asked their own union to drop the suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. This is the crap spreading that just won't go away. There are not ties to Hillary here.
As much as you want there to be it doesn't exist. Just more crap being slung and seeing if it sticks. Funny how one will say they aren't going to fall for the media hype and BS that will divide the party, next thing you know they're helping sling it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why don't the Clintons want everyone be participate? Is Rove their secret advisor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. This has been hashed over a thousand times here. I still don't understand why it is ok that some
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 07:45 PM by kikiek
workers are being accommodated, and others not. Also they are not doing a one person one vote system as they set it up. They have changed it so that other votes will be diluted by the union. Reminds me of a Jimmy Hoffa union actually. As a union member myself we do not endorse primaries. We support the Democratic nominees, and even then it is only suggested. There are no guarantees that all will vote one way or another. I expect it is the same with the Culinary union. People are talking like the whole union is eligible to vote, and that they will vote the way of the union suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. It's for all people who work on the strip, not just in the casinos.
As I understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Only within 2 1/2 miles, How big is Nevada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. The more accomodation of voters the better...
as a former member of the NEA, I'm ashamed that my union would do such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Why? They want equal access. Why shouldn't they? Why shouldn't everyone working on
Saturday? Make it an all day vote like a general election, heck make it a one week vote. Don't make special accommodations for some and leave others unheard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. What teacher can't get to a caucus site on a Saturday?
Special accomodations for special needs. Teachers call that, when dealing with students, an I.E.P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Why can't they change the way it is done so everyone can participate? I don't know. This isn't the
national democratic party doing it. The state decides. I would be very irate as a shift working health care worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't forget that BOTH campaigns were involved in designing the system...
...but only one of them ended up with the endorsement. :eyes:

And don't forget that even the teachers have spoken out against what there union, which Hillary has strong ties with, is doing.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4064920

Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Strong ties is a stretch, and 15 names doesn't exactly make that a representation of all members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Strange" how the Clinton camp had no problem with this system until Obama got that endorsement.
Just like they had no problem with the date of the NH primary until they thought Hillary was going to lose. I'm SICK of these REPUBLICAN TACTICS! We cannot elect Hillary and expect anything different than we have now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here is a good article that tells you how some of the people feel about it.
http://www.lvrj.com/news/13557362.html They talk to people other than teachers and casino workers. Also the votes given to a county go by the number of people. Over a set number they get extra votes. The workers votes will not count in the county that they reside in. The casinos with a set number of employees will be given the status of a county so they will get the votes and the extra ones. It then dilutes all the votes in the state. That is most likely the greater concern, except for the people in the article who want to participate but don't work in the distance of the casinos. I think it gives that union far too much power for the state of NV, and I don't care who you endorse that isn't good. And what if the worker doesn't want to vote the way they union suggests, but they're all there and voting at work. Doesn't sound too good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC