Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Phil Dunkelbarger Endorses John Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:52 PM
Original message
Phil Dunkelbarger Endorses John Edwards
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 07:01 PM by IanDB1
from Phil Dunkelbarger
to Undisclosed-Recipient,
date Jan 14, 2008 3:14 PM
subject Setting the Agenda


With the MA Primary coming up, I've been carefully considering the options, as I'm sure you are as well. For what it's worth, here's my take. Edwards and Kucinich are the only candidates with a clear message. Beyond the fact that Kucinich isn't viable, I find Edwards even more persuasive and someone a wide spectrum of voters can support. Of the three major Democratic candidates, he performs best, head to head, against each of the likely Republican opponents. So he is the safest, most electable candidate. {emphasis mine- iandb1} Beyond that, and more importantly, he's the only one who understands that this is a war, and that the opponents (those of privilage, Democrat or Republican) will not negotiate away their privilege. Unlike Obama and Clinton, he is not interested in compromising on the essential mission of eliminating the advantage of money and the power it buys. I feel very strongly it's important to keep Edwards in the race. He should be the Party's Standardbearer. But, if nothing else, continued strong showings would position him for the VP (only Southerner), so that his mission can continue to be represented, and his voice continue to be heard, both in the final campaign and in the next adminsitration.

I think the quotes below make the point well.

Best,
Phil

----

From: Jonathan Prince, Edwards for President
To: Philip Dunkelbarger
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:30 PM
Subject: Setting the Agenda

Dear Philip,

The choice in this election is simple. If we want a president who will lead America to the big, bold changes we need and change the conversation in America, Democrats should choose the candidate who has led the field in ideas and shaped the conversation in this race so far.

In this campaign, John Edwards has led on the issues -- the other candidates have merely followed.

But don't take it from me -- let me share with you some of the things people are saying about John.

As Paul Krugman writes today in The New York Times:

"On the Democratic side, John Edwards, although never the front-runner, has been driving his party's policy agenda. He's done it again on economic stimulus: last month, before the economic consensus turned as negative as it now has, he proposed a stimulus package including aid to unemployed workers, aid to cash-strapped state and local governments, public investment in alternative energy, and other measures."

And as Christopher Hayes writes in The Nation:

"The fact remains that the Edwards campaign has set the domestic policy agenda for the entire field. He was the first with a bold universal health care plan, the first with an ambitious climate change proposal that called for cap-and-trade, and the leader on reforming predatory lending practices and raising the minimum wage to a level where it regains its lost purchasing power."

In this campaign, John Edwards has led the other candidates in standing up for progressive change.

As Ezra Klein writes in The American Prospect:

"Much more so than Obama, it was Edwards who forced a new style of politics, untethered by the fear and timidity of the 90s, adamant that liberalism was an electoral boon and economic justice a popular sentiment. Knowing they had to defend against his challenge, both Hillary and Obama edged closer to his appeal.

"It left the Democrats in a much stronger position overall, and forced them to argue for, and commit to, a much broader and more inspiring agenda than we otherwise might have seen."

In this campaign, the other candidates have followed John's lead in talking about the special interests -- but the special interests understand the difference between rhetoric and reality. That's why corporate lobbyists are united against John Edwards.

As Kevin Drawbaugh reports for Reuters:

"Ask corporate lobbyists which presidential contender is most feared by their clients and the answer is almost always the same -- Democrat John Edwards. One business lobbyist said an Edwards presidency would be a 'disaster' for his well-heeled industrialist clients.

'I think Hillary is approachable. She knows where a lot of her funding has come from to be blunt,' said Greg Valliere, chief political strategist at Stanford Group Co., a market and policy analysis group."

Want to help John's field-leading campaign for change? Then please take a moment to forward these quotes on to your friends and family who live in the 48 states that have yet to cast a vote for the Democratic nominee. Tell them that you are standing with John Edwards -- and ask them to join you.

Here's the bottom line in this election. We need a president who has the vision to put forth bold, progressive solutions to the challenges facing America in the 21st century. John Edwards has shown he has that vision -- and he has led on it throughout this campaign.

Thanks for taking action.

--Jonathan Prince
Deputy Campaign Manager, John Edwards for President
January 14, 2008

P.S. - Your contribution today helps John Edwards continue to set the agenda for this election -- and to go on to the Democratic Convention, win the nomination and then the White House. Please contribute whatever you can afford to give today: Click here to make a contribution http://johnedwards.com/r/59701/1329712/



See prior threads:


How many of this fall's campaigns made impeachment a central issue
Topic started by onenote on Nov-14-06 04:23 PM (12 replies)
Last modified by Vidar on Nov-15-06 02:04 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2967289


Phil Dunkelbarger will be on The Thom Hartman Show today and on NECN!
Topic started by IanDB1 on Aug-31-06 02:29 PM (0 replies)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2805474


Who’s the real Dem? Phil Dunkelbarger’s challenge to Steve Lynch
Topic started by IanDB1 on Jul-06-06 11:35 AM (0 replies)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2711602


Don't blame ME! I voted for Phil Dunkelbarger!
Topic started by IanDB1 on Dec-14-06 02:11 PM (2 replies)
Last modified by HopeLives on Dec-16-06 12:54 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=158&topic_id=11408

Phil Dunkelbarger has support in Westwood
Topic started by IanDB1 on Sep-10-06 12:38 PM (13 replies)
Last modified by stepnw1f on Sep-19-06 09:14 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice one...
no "rock star" name, but integrity should count for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'no "rock star" name'
No kidding.

If I was stuck with a name like that, I would have it changed in 1.3 seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. deleted
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 06:59 PM by redqueen
no point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did someone on my ignore list say something wacky again? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes... "wacky"... you could say that.
If by "wacky" you mean 100% substance-free, chock-full-o-flameyness snark... then yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Alert-worthy or ignore-worthy? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ignore-worthy.
Just idiotic, meaningless crap. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Never heard of him before...who is he? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's what all those "See Also" links were for.
But I'm a little disappointed that Mr. Dunkelbarger is using "viability" as a criteria for an endorsement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Love it!
So right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. As Dunkelbarger goes, so goes the nation!
Honest John's unstoppable now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If only it were so. I'd support a Kucinich / Dunkelbarger ticket for The White House.
Wouldn't be able to fit it on a bumpersticker, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC