Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lots of cheers about Obama's win

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:20 AM
Original message
Lots of cheers about Obama's win
because he's the first minority with a chance at the White House.

Doesn't it bother anyone that the majority doesn't have a chance at the White House?
Which majority? The female majority.

I've never heard a black man say that he doesn't believe 'black man' are capable of being President.
But women frequently say the a woman isn't right for the job (not just HRC but the concept of a woman).

Women are oppressed in virtually every society on this planet. They are beaten, raped, sold, and even stoned to death because they are not staying in their correct space and properly subservient to their male masters.

So if a black male (8% of US population) wins the White House.... Big surprise (NOT!!!).
But if a female (51% of the US population) wins the White House....that would be an advance for the human race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Imnsvho..
Martin Luther King would be turning in his grave
to know that a man would have to turn so far
right to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. right?
Obama has a 95 percent liberal rating from Americans for Democratic Reform, a liberal advocacy group that ranks all members of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. As a woman, I say that's utterly ridiculous. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. based on what.....
apparently statistics and facts are not a big part of your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. OMG, that's pure cheesecake. I'd be embarrassed to post that photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Time Magazine didn't have a problem with it. That's where it's from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. I get your point, but it's poorly thought out.
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 10:46 AM by Bleachers7
Was Carol Mosely Braun the best candidate in 2004? No. It would have been a tremendous step forward to elect her, but she wasn't qualified. People like Obama because he's inspirational, and is good on the issues. The plurality in Iowa thought he was the better candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Black men have opportunities
http://www.whoswhosa.co.za/Pages/ListSadec.aspx

But how many of the 200+ countries of the world have a female leader.
Sexism is so pervasive and accepted that most people never question it.

Under your argument, Bush was the better candidate in 2000 and 2004. So why aren't you thrilled with Bush? After all the voters selected the better candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, people voted for the better person in 2000.
And people voted for Bush in 2004. I didn't agree, but that's meaningless. If Hillary had something to offer other than "fear of false hope", she might be doing better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm not talking about HRC
I'm talking about men and women being against female leaders.
With females the majority around the globe....we have had a handful of female leaders (and the number is even smaller if you exclude those who were leaders because of birthright).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm saying they're not against female leaders.
There's many elected female leaders. The best way to beat an ornery male leader is with a female leader. Female's instantly get a boost in their vote. Women vote for other women and they are generally more likable against tough guy types.

Check this out:

How many women Members are there in the U.S. Congress today?
In the House there are 74 female Representatives. The Senate has 16 females. These are the highest numbers of women Members in the history of the Congress.

Of the 16 female Senators, 11 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans. Of the 74 female Representatives, 53 are Democrats and 21 are Republicans.

Two of the women House members are sisters: Loretta Sanchez and Linda Sanchez, both Democrats from California.

The first woman elected to serve in Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin, a Republican from Montana. She served from 1917 to 1919 and again from 1941 to 1943. Since then, 193 women have been elected to serve in Congress.

To see a list of all the names of the women who have served as Members of Congress, their biographies, links to the websites of current female Members, and a brief history of women serving in Congress, visit: http://bioguide.congress.gov/congresswomen/index.asp

http://www.centeroncongress.org/learn_about/feature/qa_members.html#women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. And the numbers show that women are underrepresented
maybe itss marginally better now....

But Congress is NOT the leader of the country. The Presidency leads the country....and we're 0/43 in the female representation there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Which femal that ran in the past deserved to win?
Or was qualified to win? That's kind of my point. Hillary is by far the strongest we've had, and she's not that great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Which black male that ran in the past deserved to win?
since people are saying its about time re Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I never said it's about time.
I asked you first. :)

I think Obama is the best in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. WTF???
What exactly is the purpose of posting that link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. its obvious
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 11:07 AM by NYCALIZ
in countries were there are black majorities, black men get the leadership roles disproportionately.

Did you see a female leader in any of those pictures? No, sexism is far more pervasive than other forms of bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Your post assumes HRC does not have a chance because she is a woman. She is not a great candidate,
regardless of gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm not talking about HRC
I'm responding to the YAY, a 'black man' has a chance at the white house threads...our society is not as bigotted as its portrayed to be.

Our society meaning not only the USA but the entire globe is more bigoted than we admit. Sexism is global.
In virtually every society on the planet the women are the dogs....even if they are the majority race/religion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. If HRC was on a roll, I might be saying YAY a chance for a woman president...both serve diversity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'd love a woman prez. I do not want Hillary.
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 11:19 AM by Oregonian
I'm able to differentiate between the individual and the group. (BTW, I'm female.)

on edit, I kinda agree with you about the hurdle women have worldwide. I will find it thrilling if a black man becomes president. If Hillary were to somehow make it to prez, I would be sort of thrilled, as a woman, but it would be tempered by my dislike for her.

I dunno, it's complicated, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Did I focus on HRC in my post?
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 11:42 AM by NYCALIZ
I'm reacting the the cheers about our society is not so bigotted as to exclude a black man from the white house.
And I look at the entire globe and see that sexism excludes women from opportunity and leadership everywhere.
I'm not ready to say our society is healed until there is equal representation for every group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Right. I reread it and edited my reply.
Posted in haste, sorry.

:hi:

I basically agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Maybe I should be thankful that men have more,easier opportunities
since I have two sons and only one daughter....

But I know that my daughter's life will always be subject to male domination...in the workplace, society, political environment and more than likely in her personal life.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I have one of each.
My daughter is so damn feisty! I hope that will serve her well in the future. I don't think she'll ever let a man walk over her. If anything, she'll be doing the walking, probably with some kick-ass Nancy Sinatra boots. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. My daughter is feisty, too.
But that doesn't change much.
I'm not talking about men walking over her.
I'm talking about 'people who have power over her life' are predominantly male.
Starting with employer, including representatives, and not forgetting that the CEO's of companies which control her health care and purchases are by a huge majority MALE with male viewpoints.
Her sons toys had lead from China thanks to male decision making.
Her sons school is underfunded thanks to male decision making.
Her clothing is more expensive than her spouses thanks to male decision making.

And her being feisty has little input to change any of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. What you say is true.
And depressing. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. yea NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, a lot of what you say is true
I think part of the problem is that women underestimate themselves and each other - that's why groups such as EMILY's List were founded, to encourage women to run for office, etc.

And, on some level, I think I have trouble getting excited about a minority making it to the White House, because it's still sad to me that the female majority lags behind. I wouldn't say that's what motivates my choices in this campaign, but it is an underlying issue that I think weighs on my subconsciously.

Thanks for bringing this up, NYCALIZ, it's interesting to think about - it's certainly made me examine my own feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I don't know if its underestimation
I think its because the entire framework of our thinking has been shaped by sexism.

You ask kids today what they want to be when they grow up.
At least five times as many girls will say a Mommy than boys will say a Daddy.
And a girl saying President is still few and far between.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC