Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes Mr. Obama, a Lobbyist IS Running Your Campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:31 PM
Original message
Yes Mr. Obama, a Lobbyist IS Running Your Campaign
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/6/

Story Updated.
Daily Kos
Yes Mr. Obama, a Lobbyist IS Running Your Campaign
by owl06
Sun Jan 06, 2008 at 12:37:16 PM PST

In last night's debate, honey-tongued Barack Obama eloquently made his case for 'change.' Obama wants to form a coalition of willing Democrats, independents, and yes -- even Republicans -- to shake up Washington. Before Mr. Obama does to Washington, the first term Senator may want to consider shaking up his own campaign: His New Hampshire co-chair Jim Demers is a lobbyist for the pharmaceutical industry.

Hillary Clinton informed the Senator that a lobbyist was running his campaign during a sharp exchange about health care. Obama righteously denied the charge, but unfortunately for Obama, it was
proven true by Time's Mark Halperin. Obama was either grossly misinformed or worse. More after the Flip.

* owl06's diary :: ::
*

How could Barack Obama not know that his campaign chair is a Big Pharma lobbyist? You can see the exchange here with your own eyes:

In order to understand the full dimension of Obama's coziness with lobbyists, you have to go back to his Chicago stumping grounds.

According to the Associated Press, "Barack Obama played poker and basketball with lobbyists when he was a state senator. He took their campaign donations and worked with them to write legislation ... A look at Obama’s seven years in the Illinois Legislature reveals a complicated relationship with lobbyists - particularly for someone who now makes criticism of lobbyists a centerpiece of his presidential campaign."

In the present Obama makes bold statements such as this:

"We have chance to say to the corporate lobbyist, your days of setting the agenda in Washington are over. They have not funded my campaigns, they will not run my White House, and they will not drown out the voice of the American people when I am president of the United States." – Barack Obama in Concord, New Hampshire, January 2008

But his rhetoric is not matched by the reality of his campaign's actions; he has a lobbyist running the show in New Hampshire. In this case, it is a lobbyist whom is registered to lobby for Pfizer and PhRMA.

What's more, Obama has paid lobbyists on his staff. The No Quarter blog reported that:

"Three political aides on Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) payroll were registered lobbyists for dozens of corporations, including Wal-Mart, British Petroleum and Lockheed Martin, while they received payments from his campaign, according to public documents."

In a recent interview with MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, David Bonior, Edwards' campaign manager, made this observation:

"If you look at his record in Illinois when he had a major -- sponsored a major health bill that's what he did. He watered down with the help of the corporate lobbyist and they got a weak product out of that."

Is Barack misinformed, or is he lying? Democrats need to take a much harder look at Senator Obama, before the fox(s) ends up running the biggest of all hen houses. America cannot afford to play poker with our next President. It's about integrity.

Poll

Should A Big Pharma Lobbyist Be Running Obama's new Hampshire Campaign?
Yes, words matter more than actions
7% 11 votes
No, he should back up his own rhetoric
73% 112 votes
I'm blissfully ignoring it
19% 30 votes

| 153 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Barack Obama, Lobbyists, Hillary Clinton, New Hampshire, Recommended (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

View Comments | 225 comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Obviously we should have vetted Donnie McClurkin more. Nobody had any idea what his views were."
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I expect lots of ad hominem attacks and straw men, but..
It's true.

Obama lied.

Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. because of a kos diary?
that's all it takes? btw, the link does not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R for Obama's lies and deceptions...
Perhaps Obama will want to "change" his response?:evilgrin:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nice Try, but don't believe EVERYTHING you read on Kos
LMAO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting in the AP quote about poker, the OP leaves out THIS part of the paragraph:
Barack Obama played poker and basketball with lobbyists when he was a state senator. He took their campaign donations and worked with them to write legislation. But he also helped pass ethics laws to reduce sharply their influence.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/01/AR2007120100745.html

Also:

But while in the state legislature, Obama was a relatively small fish when it came to Illinois political money.

He usually got donations of a few hundred dollars or maybe $1,000 in a state where interest groups routinely give key officials tens of thousands of dollars at a time.

Disclosure reports show he rarely accepted gifts or meals from lobbyists, even though there was no limit on such freebies until Obama helped pass a law establishing one. For him, a big gift was $50 worth of tickets to a Rembrandt exhibit from the Art Institute of Chicago.

AND:

Even friendly lobbyists could expect sharp questioning about their legislation.

"When you walked into his office, you'd better have all the facts," said Michael Lieteau, a lobbyist who played both basketball and poker with Obama. Lieteau lobbies for AT&T, which gave Obama at least $5,250 through its PAC.

Obama helped pass two of the toughest ethics laws in Illinois history, and both of them attempted to reduce the influence of lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. and no names named. i love that.
lobbyist for this and that. who would those people be, exactly. like what are their names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What difference would it make? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. you expect me to believe this without facts?
i want them to name names so i can figure out who and what they are talking about. i am in obama's home town here. i know a lot of the people in the campaign personally.
why would you think that the facts don't matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Everyone who is quoted in that article is named. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. It's funny how some people leave out the part where it skewers their intention
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Except that it's a damn lie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9.  Has Obama Produced Those State Senate Records Yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here is the . . . LINK . . . to the LOBBYIST/INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTION totals for each candidate:



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3970324



There are HUGE DIFFERENCES (Well, actually HRC's & Obama's are somewhat similar. But there is one leading candidate who is markedly less beholden to lobbyist/industry special interests.








look at the totals & draw your own conclusions.





:kick:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
College Liberal Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Daily Kos
:eyes: He is such a girly man. I can't stand his lame ass. He annoys me. I wish he gets a real job and stop sitting behind a laptop all day being hateful. Kos, is that too much like doing right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. So what we have here is a couple of FORMER lobbyist and a NH Campaign Co-Chair who is no longer a
Lobbyist, but registered to act as one.

Whats the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I was just saying... Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. To vet or not to vet, that is question...'tis the season to be vetted
Its about damn time. Too bad a few NH voters may not pick up this little gem in time to
make the right decision. Quite a few actually.

What's worse is that he's played basketball with them, in turn they were allowed to play
legislature. Tsk, tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. the link you gave goes nowhere (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Is Barack misinformed, or is he lying?"
Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC