If the Hillary, Obama campaigns go negative on one another. Who has more to hide?

[Quixote1818]

Hillary is threatening to go negative on Obama but will she just be opening the door for Obama to come back with worse dirt on her? Who likely has more skeletons in their closet?

[K Gardner]

1. I'm just gonna say one thing. HRC better be very careful about another series of

negative attacks on Obama. He is the media darling right now. He is America's darling right now. Hell, I'm leaning toward Edwards and he's MY darling right now. She's going to find her campaign facing a serious (as in THE END) world of hurt if she pulls more crapola out of her shiny blingbling bag of tricks.

[sandnsea]

2. Obama has said absolutely NOTHING about going negative

Nice way to plant disinformation though.

[Quixote1818]

3. Who said he had?

:shrug:

[MannyGoldstein]

4. Obama Has A *Lot* To Hide

I hear that he has some Negro ancestors or something like that. And most people don't know - yet - that he's a practicing homo sapien, and has had liaisons with thespians.

Could get ugly.

[K Gardner]

5. Do you have a link to support your allegations?!

:sarcasm: :-)

[emilyg]

6. Obama.

We know all about Clinton.

[Joe the Revelator]

7. Obama would be an idiot to go negative

He'd be making the same mistake that Hillary made.

[TwilightZone]

8. I'm not sure what Hillary could have still hidden.

$70 million digs a lot of dirt. Didn't find much.

[annie1]

9. She does in that she had access to a president who made some shitty decisions.