Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alter: Slumber Party. The caucuses are key. That doesn't mean they aren't dull.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:34 PM
Original message
Alter: Slumber Party. The caucuses are key. That doesn't mean they aren't dull.
The Iowa Democratic caucuses are a snooze---not the various campaigns for president but the caucuses themselves. I've attended several over the years as a reporter and invariably walk out before they're over. This year, the soporific nature of the process, which can take as long as two hours, will most harm Barack Obama, for reasons I'll explain.

You've read how the caucuses are undemocratic because they disenfranchise people who work at night--how they violate the principle of the secret ballot. But that's just the Democratic caucuses. The Republican caucuses, which date only to 1980, are a breeze. You show up at 7 p.m., you vote almost like in a primary, you go home. If you're on the night shift, it's usually easy enough to take part while on break.

The Democratic caucuses, by contrast, feel like the SATs, where a fussbudget caucus chair, enjoying his or her moment in the sun, explains a mind-numbing series of rules and insists that you obey them if you want your effort to count. The instructions for the caucus chairs run to 72 pages. If you're lucky, the chair won't read any more than 10 of them aloud.

The procedures are so stultifying I'm reluctant to list them here, but to give you a flavor, consider that before moving to various corners of the room with other supporters of the same candidate for the preliminary vote, you must sit through the vote on the permanent caucus chair (self-nominations welcome), official letters from more than a half-dozen Iowa politicians (most chairs are merciful enough to allow these to be distributed), and a lengthy explanation of the delegate-selection process that requires an advanced degree in mathematics to fully understand.

More at the link - http://www.newsweek.com/id/83154

Interesting look at the process and kudos to those who brave weather and boredom to participate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can only imagine!
I was reading the caucus rules and guidelines at the Iowa Caucus site earlier today, and it was enough to numb me. One can only hope for a caucus chair that is not so enamored of his/her position that s/he does not read through all the speeches and flimflam.

My brother will be at one in Cedar Rapids, so I look fwd to a first-hand accounting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC