Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh good grief! CNN's Blitzer is about to talk about Chelsea Clinton's snub of a 9 year old

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:42 PM
Original message
Oh good grief! CNN's Blitzer is about to talk about Chelsea Clinton's snub of a 9 year old
Filling in all that dead time I see. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you duck tape his mouth
over your tv screen and mute the sound, it can be a really enjoyable way to spend a few minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. They talked about it here yesterday
:puke:
I am not a Clinton fan...but it definitely was not a snub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fox News actually
interviewed the girl. They tried to get her to say something against Chelsea Clinton. The girl said that Chelsea had been "really nice" to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Really? That figures. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It was hilarious.
I was reminded of the old lawyers' saying, that one should never put a person on the witness stand unless you know what they are going to say. Fox News had been running nasty little reports all morning, about how mean Chelsea had been, and hinting that this 4th grader was really upset. The little girl was wonderful, talking about how nice Chelsea was. There are great photos of her and Chelsea, and her and President Bill Clinton. It is obvious they both paid a lot of attention to this youngster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. And in the original article, the girl's mom said that the event convinced her to vote for Hillary
she had previously been undecided. So I guess neither the girl nor her mom were too torn up about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It was ironic.
Fox wanted to have an opportunity to slam Chelsea Clinton for treating a 4th grader thoughtlessly, and it was clearly Fox, not Chelsea Clinton, who was guilty of just that. They should be ashamed of themselves, but I do not think they are capable of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. In all fairness to Fox News
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 08:09 PM by Tactical Progressive
if they had a sense of shame, there wouldn't BE a Fox News.

You can't really ask them to give up their very reason for existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Expect more of this if she gets the top spot
however, it brings up an amusing contradiction. Many Hillary bashers say she's just as in bed with the Bushes as Bill is, yet if that were true, why would the media hate her so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. That's simplifying
shit too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. How so?
I'm just saying they can't have it both ways. The media is in bed with Bush, the Clintons are supposedly in bed with Bush, so why are they after her like rabid dogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. There's been plenty
of backing hillary from the media..that doesn't mean they won't go dirty the minute they sniff mean spirited gossip(which sucks..I hate the corporatemediawhores).

clinton covered for bush1 and hillary will want "to move on and look forward" if she gets in so ergo no accountabilty for bushit2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Have I got a thread for you, complete with distortions and the definition of rickrolled, LOL.
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 06:52 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. "Oh dear good grief oh brother gods"
LOL. I'm saving that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Isn't that the best?
:rofl:

I would love to send to JeffR for the DUzy's, but how could he single out just a few posts?

:rofl:

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Great snark....brought in one of those 'self-righteous" Freeper types n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. But, but, what about the CHILDREN?
:cry:

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Go check the NY Time's Caucus
The little girl was interviewed after her appearance at FOX and said that it was all a bunch of lies what they had reported and that she wasn't sure whether she wanted to be a reporter anymore because she didn't want to be like those people.

Out of the mouth of babes...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Smart girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. At the end
of the Fox interview, the journalist said that maybe when the little girl got older, she would work for Fox. It was obvious that the girl was not comfortable with that thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. LOL!
Is that video online? I'd like to see that! Shame on FOX for scaring that poor girl. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It should be.
I was watching Fox because when there is a lot of snow, DirecTV reception is limited. But in a way I was glad I was watching, because I think highly of Chelsea Clinton, and the interview destroyed the reports that tried to smear her.

The little girl's mother is a strong supporter of Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. wow, that's messed up of fox. digusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh damn that Clinton News Network
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Looks like they're trying to help Clinton
This story can only work in her favor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm adding this to my list
I got tipgate 1 (no tip) & 2 (too much tip), haircutgate, too-big-housegate, and of course Oprahgate.

Silly.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. How utterly superfluous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. Couldn't Chelsea make an exception?
This is a tiny little girl. She doesn't look or sound like David Broder or Maureen Dowd to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I don't think it's that she's suspicious of the girl, I think it's the principle of the thing
once she grants one interview, any other reporter (large or small:)) will be clamoring for an interview, and I think she doesn't want to open the floodgates.

Personally, I'd love for Chelsea to give an interview one of these days, but I understand completely that she doesn't want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. Because of the brouhaha, I think Chelsea should grant an exclusive interview to the girl
not only would it be sweet, but it would be a smack in the face to all the obnoxious media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC