Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Green Party presidential candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:55 PM
Original message
Green Party presidential candidates
Mods, this is not meant as a supportive post of the Green party or its candidates. I am not including links to websites or more info on the Green party. I merely thought DUers may want to know what Green candidates are running. Thanks!


Jared Ball, independent journalist; radio host (WPFW 89.3 FM Pacifica Radio in Washington, DC), hip-hop scholar, assistant professor of communications studies at Morgan State University in Baltimore, Maryland

Elaine Brown, 2005 Green candidate for Mayor of Brunswick, Georgia; former leader of the Black Panther Party; organizer of Mothers Advocating Juvenile Justice and National Alliance for Radical Prison Reform

Jesse Johnson, 2006 US Senate candidate and 2004 gubernatorial candidate for the Mountain Party in West Virginia (now affiliate state party of the Green Party of the United States); filmmaker

Cynthia McKinney, former member of the US House of Representatives (Georgia), 1993 to 2003, 2005 to 2007; former member of the Georgia House of Representatives, 1988-1992

Kent Mesplay, 2004 candidate for the Green presidential nomination; former president of Turtle Island Institute; environmental engineer, alternative energy activist; California Green organizer

Ralph Nader, 1996 and 2000 Green candidate for President; 2004 independent candidate for President; consumer advocate (Howie Hawkins of the Green Party of New York State has consented to serve as a 'placeholder' candidate until Mr. Nader announces his intentions for the 2008 election)

Kat Swift, Texas Green organizer; former Campus Greens leader; activist with Clean Money San Antonio and San Antonio Democracy Now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ralph "Bad Penny" Nader. I hope he gets beaten by, say,
Jesse "Who the Hell" Johnson, or Kat "Never heard of her" Swift.

It would serve his hubris-laden, irritating ass right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He's like a bad penny, isn't he?
Just keeps on coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hulk/Smash '08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. What we need is a Purple party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Greens need to fold in the U.S. They'll never live down 2000.
I'm not against a progressive party. I just don't that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why keep blaming the Greens for 2000
when up to 30 to 40% of Americans didn't even vote.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. It's easier for them I guess than blaming the Supreme Court
and their unprecedented interference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Because we expect them to know better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Look at the numbers
Gore didn't lose because of the Greens. They didn't help him any, but they aren't the reason he lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. 90,000 votes in Florida. Nader and the Greens were down there begging voters not to trade...
...their votes in the final weeks for votes in "safe" states.

Only would have taken 1/2 of one percent of them to save us from Bush.


I used to participate in Green functions locally and have donated to them in the distant past.

Never again. Nobody will ever take them seriously again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. or
that amount of people who didn't vote at all to get out and give 30 mins of their time to participate in the election. Sorry to harp on this point but American apathy towards your great democratic tradition is more to blame than those who participated and voted the way you didn't want.

There is something in compulsory voting.


Peace


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandmXs Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. what about Dems in FL who voted for Bush?
People have the right to vote for anyone they wish to but when they're registered Democrat
don't you think they ought to vote for the Democratic candidate??

But tens of thousands of Democrats in FL voted FOR Bush!!
I don't see you tarring and feathering them!!
Now those are the people you ought to be tagging as spoilers and unleashing your vitriol against,
NOT Greens.
Greens are NOT Dems for a reason and nobody owns anybody's votes.
Dems should do something to rein in registered Dem voters next time instead of trying to engineer wacky switcheroo schemes. Maybe there should be consequences for Dems who vote Republican???



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandmXs Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. you don't have much of a choice . . .
the Democratic Party is certainly not a progressive party so where are you looking?
Why are you so dead set against the Greens existence if you are looking for another party to
challenge the Dems and serve as an opposition? As soon as they do something that makes you and the rest of the hatters mad, like "take votes away," you'll be spewing hate and vitriol their way as well!

2000 was the result of the Supreme Court.
There is nothing to live down except that new ideas, especially the one that says that US politics is NOT the exclusive domain of two parties, were refreshingly presented.
Is that something to fear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hasn't Nader endorsed Edwards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think he said if Edwards is the candidate, he won't run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Sort of.
He said he wouldn't run if Edwards is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'll bet it was about as close to an endorsement as Nader has ever made..

Considering the fact that he likes Kucinich too.

You're right though.. he's pulling for Edwards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh no. There's no WAY that an endorsement is even implied!
hahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Believe what you want
Many of us come to DU for news, information. That's all this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. Self-absorbed, holier-than-thou assholes who haven't suffered enough.....8 MORE YEARS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. mkay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandmXs Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. That's not a nice . . .
way to characterize your fellow Democrats, amigo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Cynthia McKinney was driven out of the Democratic Party by the DCL and the War Wing
Cynthia's biggest crime was to say that Bush had been forewarned about 9-11. She was accused of being insane for making such a charge, by Republicans and their allies in the Democratic Party establishment.

As it turned out, Cynthia was right! When the MSM published the astonishing news that Bush had been fully briefed in early 2001 about bin Laden's plans to attack the US, including crashing hijacked passenger jets into national landmarks, the Democratic establishment resisted the calls for a full investigation.

Had Al Gore been President on 9-11, and he had done nothing on the same information Bush was given that May. he would have been impeached on 9-13.

Both major political parties are agents of the powerful economic interests that control this country. Both have failed to protect the American people from our enemies, at home and abroad. Both have been complicit in the dismantling of our beloved Constitution and the Republic for which so many have shed their blood to defend and protect. Both are in cahoots in pursuing an imperialist policy to protect Wall Street. None care about the working class!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Of these candidates, Cynthia McKinney is the heavylifter...
Might be good for her to get some experience in a presidential run and then return to the Dems for a real run.

She is a most forceful speaker. She really nailed BushCo in her last public speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandmXs Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. anti-christ II
You think?
I would think that the Dems have drummed her out of that party and, having joined the Green Party,
would be branded as the second coming of the Anti-christ and heir apparent to Ralph Nader as
<insert your favorite overused obscenity> judging from past etiquette at least!
Would you guys respect Kucinich more if he ran as a Green?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. Has Nader even joined the Green Party yet?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
24. LOL
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 02:34 AM by fujiyama
Wow, a selection of kooks. McKinney is nuts. Nader can go drive a Corvair off a cliff. Haven't heard of the rest of them...but they can't be as bad as those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandmXs Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. None of these "kooks" voted for war, patriot act, etc.
If you haven't heard of them, how do you characterize them as kooks?
You guys have a bunch whose kookiness has actually killed!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC