Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge is about to do a hit piece of Edwards....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:46 PM
Original message
Drudge is about to do a hit piece of Edwards....
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:49 PM by Wolsh
www.drudgereport.com

It looks remarkably like the Kerry hit he tried in '04

To be fair, its actually the enquirers hit, but still, he's going to be giving it a lot of attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Drudge.
'nuff said. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's not a Drudge exclusive
it seems to be a National Enquirer story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The same one as before, Monkey?
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:52 PM by WesDem
I can't seem to get the link to load.

Edit: I got through - that looks like an entirely different Nat'l Enquirer scandal than Edwards denied not long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. beats me!
What was there before? It's a pic of the Enquirer with a story about a supposed Edwards love-child scandal. Pregnant woman linked to Edwards in hiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. The previous one which Edwards flat out DENIES
Was the woman from New York who made his videos late last year. That was in the NE and also promoted by Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. what was that story?
I'm totally unfamiliar with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. An affair
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_cheating_scandal/celebrity/64271

Edwards firmly denied it, but the NE stands by it. It was posted here at DU when it came out on the NE site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. your link is wrong
it's www.drudgereport.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, sorry about that, I'll edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Well I took a deep breath and went there
Couldn't spend much time there because I can only hold my breath so long. I saw no sign of any hit pieces on Edwards yet, but there were a few links to discussions related to something Rush Limbaugh seems hot to discuss; whether or not America really wants to watch a woman aging while she is our President (as opposed to men who look distinguished when they age).

Yuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Its on top of the page, right above the "Drudge Report" headline.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't go to that site, so I guess I'll have to wait
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:49 PM by FrenchieCat
and learn some other way about whatever you are talking about.

If Drudge does this during the Democratic Primaries, it will only help John Edwards.
Why would anyone think otherwise....and why should Drudge? Duh! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hiding your eyes won't make it go away...
I'd rather know whats coming then to be blind sided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Could you just put a description in the OP
so people don't have to go to his site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. See, I'd rather not give it that kind of attention.
If people want to see it they can go to drudge, I don't want to overly hype it on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Then why did you start the thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. You're right, it would be more productive to act like its not out there.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Every time you load his page he makes money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I'm not closing my eyes......
I simply don't go to that site. I don't want to give him my traffic count, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Page loads = money from banner ads. I dont go there either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. A love child from a woman who's pregnant and hiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I just went and it's an ugly
rehash of the Iquirer story. They're claiming the woman in that story is pregnant. I call bullshit. This shit really makes me furious. If there's one thing I don't believe it's that Edwards is having an affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
43. Didn't the Inquirer try this a few months ago? I vaguely remember something
that end up being nothing, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. Yes. Same shit exactly, and I believe the same woman. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. If it's the same woman, it's a new wrinkle
I remember Mickey Kaus writing about it and there wasn't a pregnancy in the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. You mean that guy who still hasn't come out of the closet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It doesn't make his site any less influential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Democrats don't get "Influenced" by Drudge headlines......
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:55 PM by FrenchieCat
You've got the timing mixed up; it works during the GE at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm not timing it, I'm just letting people know whats out there...
plenty of people, republican and democrat go to the site. I watch it pretty closely, and I consider myself pretty liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. I'm not saying you are "doing" anything......
I'm just saying that Drudge is helping Edwards, and he knows it.

Democrats are not going to support a candidate based on Drudge headlines....but they will coalesce around a candidate that they feel is getting attacked by a RW source, i.e., Drudge.

I think I know this, Drudge knows this, and you should know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. well this isn't a Drudge story
It's a national enquirer story. Drudge is just pimping it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. Same difference.....
Genifer didn't hurt Clinton, and that had to be all over the Enquirer at the time, I would guess.

These types of story are known to backfire. It will just give Edwards that much more sex appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. actually
it would destroy his candidacy, if true. But I don't believe it is true. Hillary Clinton wasn't battling cancer when the Flowers story broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #56
92. If true, it would be the end.
I still like the guy's fight against the corps, but this would be a mess.

I'll be looking at Biden and Dodd if Edwards goes under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. That one can stay in the closet.
Sorry, but this gay feller doesn't want that asshole in club. Tom Cruise too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. What is that supposed to mean? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. yeah --hes' a huge horn dog--although in the closet
:rofl:

They can't decide which attack to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. He's referring to Drudge, not Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. oh--sorry--still they don't call Edwards Breck Girl because they think he's macho
They are attacking Edwards six ways from Sunday--and Drudge was the first with the haircut story, bless his closeted heart, if any
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is he trying to help Edwards?
Not sure how that tabloid stuff can do anything but help Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Drudge & The National Enquirer, Wolsh? Hahahahahaahahaha
I'm certain you're delighted to bring this here, but come ON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Actually you couldn't be further from the truth. I have no ill will against any candidate..
aside from Hillary. I'd be happy to support John Edwards, I'm just letting people know its out there.


Its not like I wrote the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. In All Fairness, It May Not Be A Hit Piece
It might simply be reporting. The Enquirer has gotten a number of scoops (e.g., Jessie Jackson's love child).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Well, get ready for your well-deserved funeral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. I heard a rumor that the person who owns the National Enquirer is a big Clinton supporters
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM by bigdarryl
Last week they did a hit piece on Opera Winfrey. HOW CONVENIENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I Doubt It
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:56 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
There's nothing more the Clintons would like to see than Edwards win the Iowa caucus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. and the Enquirer
broke the Monica Lewinsky blue dress story - they don't seem to be close friends with the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Yeah the Enquirer has NEVER done a story on Oprah!
Why this must be a FIRST!!!

And they've NEVER had hit pieces on Bill and Hillary!

Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. They did do a piece on her last week her face was on the front cover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Are you on crack?
Now the Enquirer is a mouth piece for Hillary??

Is that what you are grasping at?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. I did hear that rumor don't get mad at me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. I heard a rumor
that Obama's shtupping Oprah and is gonna leave Michelle. Steadman is pissed.

See how fun rumors are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. Especially When An Edwards Win In Iowa Is Almost As Good As A Clinton Win For Clinton
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. Well my next door neighbor's sister
told her cleaning lady who is a friend of MY cleaning lady that she (neighbors sister) saw Michelle Obama and Steadman out at a club and they were VERY friendly. My cleaning lady said that her friend said that the lady told her that she overheard Steadman tell Michelle that Oprah is a control freak and she keeps him (Steadman)on a budget and he's voting for Edwards. Michelle was over heard telling Steadman that she (Michelle) really hates Oprah and he caught Barack having phone sex with her (Oprah). She (Michelle) threw the phone out the winder of the hotel and kicked Barack in the nuts.

It's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. LOL....
Ahh..too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
89. Wow! I heard a rumor that HRC is a Nazi agent!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's the National Enquirer
Who do we know that owns that rag, and who are they friends with? Roger Altman who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. one more time: the last thing Clinton wants is Edwards knocked
out. You don't think her camp knows where most of those votes would go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
46. The Clinton Smear Campaign Finds a New Target
We already know that they use Drudge to launch attacks on their opponents!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #46
73. More crack smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #73
84. Apparently the word cocaine didn't do too well in Mark Penn's focus group n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. Fuck Drudge and the Enquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
50. Why do ppl take this drudge guy seriously?
He is just an asshole w/ a computer, nothing more.

eew, I won't click on the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #50
70. Because he broke the story about the "blue dress"?
he beat all of the MSM to it and became a nationally known dirt digger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
59. There is no way this smear could possibly be true
Edwards would not be so stupid as to deny this (and to continue his candidacy) if it was true, knowing that the baby will be born well before the election and a DNA test would prove him to be a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
60. well it's not drudge
it's the enquirer... but if this turns out to have legitimacy, it will sink hillary... Her only chance at this point is to retain her support and watch edwards take a large percentage of the anybody but hillary vote. if edwards falls into scandal at the last minute, his votes will siphon off to obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Wait, if what's true?
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:24 PM by seasonedblue
If the story's true about an Edwards' love child, it will sink Hillary? Clinton isn't going to try to damage Edwards in the primary, she wants him to come out ahead of Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
62. Is the child named Bat Boy?
1. NE = Doubtful
2. IF it we're true, I don't really care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
63. Can the Hillary campaign get anymore desperate?
Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. As A Matter Of Curiousity, Sir
Do have anything remotely resembling evidence that connects this to Sen. Clinton's campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Mark Penn and James Carville are on her stafff
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:55 PM by itsrobert
That says a lot, right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #69
75. Even MORE crack smoking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #75
85. Guess cocaine didn't poll too well, they've moved on to another word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #69
76. It Says Nothing At All, Sir
You were asked for actual evidence linking this to Sen. Clinton's campaign; all you have provided is evidence of your own predispositions,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #69
78. For godssakes, it doesn't benefit Clinton
if Edwards drops out of the race. Why not assume it's an ugly RW smear first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. Are they really?
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:58 PM by MaineDem
I don't think so,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #69
81. No
Carville is not on her staff. People just love to make shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #63
77. What makes you say this has anything to do with Clinton?
This is pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
64. I'm going to say it. There is a CHANCE that this may not turn out to be false.
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:38 PM by smalll
I didn't really think up until this point that Edwards had an extramarital problem. But we know a couple of things:

First, there was that story a couple of months ago about an alleged Edwards affair. Allegedly he met the woman in a bar in NYC. Many people will tell you that story was "debunked" which is too strong a word: it was "debunked" when the woman in question, a Rielle Hunter, denied it. That takes some air out of the story, but that's hardly a debunking - "get Rielle" one might almost say. And now there's this one about a pregnant woman out there, allegedly impregnated by Mr. Edwards.

Second, I think, and a lot of non-Edwardsians agree, that Edwards has character issues - basically, he's a little bit much of a do-anything-say-anything overly ambitious adventurer type. A toot-your-own-horner. A phony at a level far beyond the normal background phoniness of most politicians. A little too much of a huge-housed egotist getting his jollies. Now such a man doesn't at all HAVE to have a voracious appetite for sex, but such men often do.

Seriously, I'm just saying: I doubt this will turn out to be true. At the end of the day, I'd still put my money on the idea that John's bimbo eruption score after this has played itself out will still be a perfect 0. But I'm not willing to say it can't be possible. Given the ways of the world, stranger things have happened. Far stranger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Oh for god's sakes. That smear and pathetic attempt at psychoanalysis was
just Hillaryesque. Need attention much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. I don't think the psychoanalysis was that off.
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:42 PM by smalll
And driving, striving adventurers often have a sex drive they can't help but feed. Do I know Edwards is an adventurer? Yes. Do I know he's the extracurricular type? Not at all yet. I'm just saying this is possible. Just possible!

PS: Some might say that Edwards wouldn't do anything so stupid as to play around when it could destroy his chances at the Presidency. But he HAS done something stupid like that before: he built that house! He let himself go on that, I'm of an open mind whether he might make similar mistakes in other fields of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. Dr Phil, is that you?
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:40 PM by itsrobert
Giving Oprah/Obama an assist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #74
80. Ha! How did you know?
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:49 PM by smalll
Yeah, but I'm just sitting around in my underwear drunk-posting on the internet. Ever since She turned her life-giving rays of power over towards that pipsqueak Senator, I've been feeling so unloved and insecure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #64
86. babble much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #64
90. character issues?
You obviously have no clue about what John and Elizabeth have been through and how strong the bonds of their marriage are.

Go take that crap elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
67. It just keeps getting better everyday!
Imagine! A no good, rightwingnut slime ball like Drudge is coming after us?

Can you believe this? Yes indeed, things are looking better for the Edwards campaign everyday.

Fighting someone who is scared, is easier. They make dumb mistakes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
68. When is the story about Obama's love child going to surface?
I won't hold my breath. On the other hand an affair with an intern
failed to bring a popular president down, so I can't see how an affair
even if it true will bring Edwards down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
82. I haven't liked clinton campaigning in the past week..
but no way she's the source of this. She needs edwards and obama to split the anybody but hillary vote... one drops out early she's sunk.

the juiciest theory would be edwards camp leaked it knowing it's not true, having it proven to be false, and playing the victim just before iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. Yeah, it's not
Edwards' style to pull a "juicy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. Any evidence that Edwards leaked this?
oh boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #82
91. This isn't coming from a campaign
The original story in October came from friends of the woman involved and was based on emails between the two of them. I suspect the untrustworthy friend did it for the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
83. PLEASE DON'T CLICK ON THE FUCKING LINK!!!
You do and you make Drudge happy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC