Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking Holy Crap...Lieberman to endorse McCain tomorrow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:18 PM
Original message
Breaking Holy Crap...Lieberman to endorse McCain tomorrow
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, who was on the national Democratic ticket in 2000, will cross the aisle to endorse Sen. John McCain tomorrow, according to Republican sources.

Full story: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7418.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought he would have endorsed Obama
since Obama endorsed him in '06. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. No way would Joe endorse Obama, he's too much of a dove for Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I thought he would have endorsed Hillary since she endorsed him in 2006 AND voted for IWR and K-L
Plus, they're both AIPAC acoloytes and Bill held a huge rally for Lieberman in 2006 where he gushed over Joementum like a schoolgirl.

Ah well, I guess Lieberman agress with the Des Moines Register -- Hillary would be his default choice, I'm sure: Neocons stick together.
That's why Hillary has Michael O'Hanlon and Lee Feinstein on her foreign policy team while Obama has Anthony Lake and Samantha Powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Thank G-d for democrats he didn't! people need to stay as far away...
from Leiberman as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. He didn't? Get your facts straight PLEASE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. i mean thank goodness Leib. didn't endorse obama. either way...
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 03:43 PM by annie1
thanks for the links. ewww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Ya I just realized that, I wrote another reply below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
86. Oh, dear! I don't think I knew that during the campaign, as I had decamped to Rome in the
last few days...aargh!

Why didn't Obama know what we REAL Dems knew here in CT about that sumbitch Lieberman? The nerve of that guy getting Obama's endorsement and then 3rd partying it, gaming the system as Ned called it.

I just hope and pray that Obama is sorry for what he did. Those of us who tried so hard for Ned Lamont are gonna be a bit skeptical and will want some answers if Obama is our standard bearer in the General...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #86
113. he endoresed Lieb in the primary NOT the general
NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. oops sorry I misinterpreted what you wrote
I thought you meant "thank god Obama didn't endorse lieberman"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
49. Now that takes the cake...
for the most Ignorant, moronic statement I have yet to ever see on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Did Obama endorse Lieberman or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. He did when Lieberman was a Dem but when he ran as CfL..
then Obama backed Lamont. Hillary stayed quite while her agents continued to support Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
88. You have that backwards.
Hillary backed Lamont after the primary.

Obama stuck it out with Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #88
109. Nope, that's wrong, too.
Both HRC and BO supported Lieberman in primary and Lamont in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. I am getting conflicting reports on that
if you could provise me with a link on that?

I don't doubt you --but am having trouble finding Obama supporting Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #111
118. Here's a couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #58
89. Oh, that's better...
not a lot, but a little bit. Still the question remains, why didn't Obama see what ordinary Dems like myself and others who were foot soldiers for Ned in our local towns could see? Or maybe do a little research before he made his endorsement? You know, like find out what us CT Dems had against Joe that we would back Ned? All I did was collect signatures and make phone calls. I was no political guru. I couldn't give Ned a lot of money (not that he needed my money). I just believed Ned and had become disenchanted with Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:48 PM
Original message
Why didn't he endorse Hillary for the same reason?
I'm sure you would have relished it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
63. Unlike Obama, Hillary didn't endorse Lieberman
Check your facts, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Yes she did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #66
93. And Obama also supported Lamont after the primary
www.nedlamont.com/blog/1976/barack-obama-writes-emails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #66
98. LOL read what it says
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 06:04 PM by Lirwin2
Senators Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Mark Pryor, Frank Lautenberg, Evan Bayh, Tom Carper, Dick Durbin, Diane Feinstein, Ken Salazar, Ron Wyden and Ben Nelson all endorsed Lieberman in the primary. However, Senators Mark Pryor, Ken Salazar, Tom Carper, Barack Obama, and Ben Nelson were the only Democratic Senators who endorsed Lieberman's independent run.

Hillary Clinton pledged to support the nominee. Barack Obama endorsed Lieberman's run as an independent :rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #98
120. That's not true according to Lamont's site
The November 7th election is right around the corner. Please join me in supporting Ned Lamont with your hard work on-the-ground in these closing weeks of the campaign.


There was this article that says he endorsed Lamont:
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/65/23468


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
105. Bill campaigned for Lieberman at a huge rally. Watch the YouTube video of his gushing endorsement:
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rr_n6EL5MA

Bill describes Joementum to the crowd in 2006: "He's been a good Democrat, he's a good man and he'll do you proud."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. crap. what an ass! can we kick him off his committees now??
bastard

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
80. Good question. Can he be kicked out of the democratic party?
He certainly should be kicked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. he's already left the party, but he caucuses with us giving us the majority
argh......

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't touch Politico with a ten foot pool. But, they are most likely fed these "exclusives" so no
reason to doubt the veracity, yet.

We shall see. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. He Crossed That Rubicon YEARS Ago
Probably even before he was nominated as Democratic Candidate for Vice President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
90. There were signs as far back as the Clarence Thomas nomination.
But at least he had been around Connecticut! He is practically Nowhere Man in our state nowadays. He deserted New Haven and his Orthodox congregation here and went to Stamford (which might as well be an extension of NYC). He used to go to diners to shake hands but I don't think he's done that in years. He took the Dems of CT for a ride, those fooolish enough to vote for him as an Indy, and left.

Thanks a bunch, Joe, you evil bastid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Somehow I'm not surprised.
Joe loves his war and none of the Dems are down with it, even Hillary. So he's gotta go with one of the War Guys.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. how far right does a democrat need to go
before his peers tell him he needs to change party affiliation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. That's what I want to know. Can we throw Joe out of the Dem Party
now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. He's not a Democrat!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #26
116. The people already did, even if the country club won't.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. He's an Independent now. He became a free agent last election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
100. Oh, yeah, I forgot. I guess I still have horrible flashbacks about him
being the Dem VP nominee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Like this is going to influence anybody. Bwah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. To the extent that these endorsments matter...
yes, I think it might. He DID win in CO, much as we would like to forget the fact. And CO is a state of lovely shade of blue. And on issues that are not related to Iraq, security, etc., he is OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. He didn't win in CO. He didn't even place.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
78. Silly mistake
I meant of course Connecticut, not Colorado :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #78
87. LOL, no harm, no foul. It was just a surprise to a Coloradan to see that post.
We may be a lot of things out here, but Lieberman's constituent base, we're not. :-) MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. Lucky you! Hi, Bleeding heart! How ya doin'?
We've got a nasty freezing rain situation here. Hubby is roasting a chicken, I'm in my sweats and trying to keep warm.

I just hate it when Joe pops back up on the radar screen. He is such an annoyance to me, mostly because I tried so hard for Ned and back then, so many Dems just didn't believe us when we argued for Ned. I hope they're satisfied now, but I think they know they've been snookered because they're vewy, vewy quiet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #91
106. Hi and back atcha CTY. :-) We're finally thawing out here in in the
mile high.

Does Lamont have any opportunity to try again? I didn't know a lot, just that he articulated his positions well and he had clever ads.

IIRC, he made money from cable TV, as did many.

Stay warm! :toast: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #106
123. Ned made money but also inherited money. His family was pretty political; he had an uncle who was a
radical leftist (Corliss Lamont).

I don't know if he plans another campaign for office. Apart from working on Ned's campaign, my link with the Lamonts was through their support for Planned Parenthood of CT where I worked as a Major Gifts Officer from 1999 to Dec., 2004. As major donors, Annie and Ned helped PPC set up their first house party in Greenwich (a house party in Greenwich is in a huge mansion with a fully tented outside area and fancy catered food -- even so, we made pretty good money there!). The Lamonts offered their house as the first one.

Unfortunately, PPC (because of the PP Federation rules) had to endorse Joe in the General and that cooled the relationship (I was retired from PPC by that time so I wasn't on hand for the particulars. Many of the staff at PPC supported Ned).

I hope Ned does run again, he is a good guy. I only knew him slightly and gathered signatures pre-primary and made calls in the Senate campaign, so I was a minor player. Calling was a tedious task but they needed callers so I trouped down to his hq a few times a week over the summer and early fall of 2006. Voting absentee ballot, I left for Rome a few days before the fall election, thereby missing lots of action. I could get the International Herald Tribune in the cities there but not in the littler Italian towns. I heard about our taking the Senate when I was in Siena and I danced in the Campo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why are you surprised? MY only surprise is he's not endorsing Giuliani.
I guess he's too liberal for Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. Isn't lieberman pretty liberal socially? Giulaini is straight freak all around...
i would imagine Joe finds giuliani revolting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Yes, he is
And, relatively speaking so is Giuliani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Well, he's not big on the cheating on your wife thing...
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 03:38 PM by jenmito
which is why he was chosen as Gore's VP (to distance Gore from Bill). It's just that Giuliani is "Mr. 9/11." They ARE both liberal. I guess I should've said Giuliani's too immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't wait
for his Zell Miller speech at the convention this summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm not surprised at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Joe wants DOD SOOOOO bad
He will back any hack hawk who will cave when the plays are called by the real powers.

I used to have some grudging respect for McCain. Seems like such a LONG time ago. But, I knew when he got off so easy in the Keating Five Fiasco that some puppet-master would be controlling him when it was handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not all that surprising to me. Joe is a loose cannon, and a putz.
Perhaps he has delusions of grandeur in being given the VP nod with McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. If so, at least he has thrown away his endorsement. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Yoo hoo, Mr. McCain -- I'm available for the veep nom!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. What a loser - selling out everything just to be Veep! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. What did anyone expect from him?
He's a warmongering, bush-ass kissing, conservative prick. What a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. He seems to have become a one-issue guy
and that issue is the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bill Clinton on Larry King in 2006: Dems in Conn. lucky to be in win-win situation.
Yes - Connecticut Demsocrats had no wrong choice to make in 2006, right Bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who listens to Lieberman anymore?
Seriously, who cares what he thinks? He's got zero credibility anymore.

John McCain is old and tired and wrong about the war. Joe needs to retire before he makes himself look any more foolish.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Original message
i'm shocked, just shocked
someone bring me my fainting couch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Do you have the vapors?
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. why yes i do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Clintons must be stunned!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. Why on earth would the Clintons be stunned by this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #62
103. Because HRC is Joe Jr.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
74. If Lieberman's endorsement of McCain in NH siphons Independent votes from Obama, this helps Hillary.
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 04:30 PM by flpoljunkie
I would say the Clintons would be very pleased with this development. Both Hillary and Holy Joe have deep ties to the DLC.

This may possibly help McCain a bit in NH, but will hurt him with Republicans there and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. ou might be right...but I suspect it is a marginal draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #76
124. Lieberman is not a popular political figure in NH where he received only 9% of the vote in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now now, let's not bash Senator Lieberman
He's a fine Democrat, and an excellent example of Leadership, just like all DLC'ers....





























(Do I even need to use this thing? -----------> :sarcasm: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bleh
Not too surprised; I don't trust Joementum at all. Oh well, maybe it will hurt McCain; can't help with Repug primary voters to be endorsed by a (sort of) Democrat. Then again, Joementum is every Repug's favorite "Democrat"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why am I not surprised?
Can we kick him out of the party now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
71. How do we kick him out?
he's not a Democrat - hasn't been since '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good
it's not like any of the Democrats wanted, or would even be helped, by his endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
70. 2nd. I hope this is correct, that he backed Caine, cuz i'd hate for him to back Hil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. Thanks, Connecticut. Nice one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
95. Don't blame all of us in CT! Some of us tried!
We just got bogged down in folks who thought Joe was their buddy. We're not hearing from them very much these days...

But truly, some good fightin' Dems were out there trying to can Lieberman, trust me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
32. Holy breaking crap...I
thought he would support hillary after all she's done for him..but mccain is also a likely choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
35. Who is the Connecticut for Lieberman Party endorsing though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillyliberal Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
82. who cares?
We already know hes a trader. What makes you think a Lieberman endorsement will have any impact on an election? Lieberman and McCain are both old news. Mccain doesn't stand a chance anyway... why is everyone making this such a big deal? Who cares. Liberman has no influence in the presidential election, in addition to the fact that he ruined a promising Gore presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
94. I don't think it exists any more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. ... and now the Zellification is complete! Bwaa ha ha ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
56. has Zell Miller endorsed anyone yet?
that's the money shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. No shit,, now that's one scary man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #64
75. Zell On Earth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
39. Does McCain even want his endorsement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. I read somewhere on DU that Holy Joe
was referred to by Obama as his "mentor".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
43. Of course, Shoot-'em-up-Joe would sign on with Shoot-'em-up-John! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
46. The leadership needs to finally strip his
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 03:44 PM by sjdnb
Homeland Security chairmanship away from him, but they won't.

First he runs against a Dem as an Ind, and has done NOTHING as chair of HS/GO -
Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who chairs the Senate committee responsible for government oversight, says he has no plans to investigate Blackwater and other Iraq war contractors accused of potentially criminal wrongdoing. Roll Call reports
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/10/lieberman-has-no-plans-to_n_67825.html

"Democrats need to realize that George Bush is going to be their commander-in-chief for three more years, and to question his leadership is to give aid and comfort to the enemy."
http://ministryofhomelandsecurity.blogspot.com/2007/01/lieberman-snuggles-up-to-bush-again.html

Kyl-Lieberman Iran Amendment
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/09/kyllieberman_iran_amendment_passes_by_huge_margin.php

Bill Kristol, the editor of the Weekly Standard, recently told Fox News that Lieberman's campaign against Iran has made "it at least easier for the administration to consider" military action.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Lieberman_Iran_has_delcared_war_on_0702.html
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/lieberman-iran-strike-should-be-considered-2007-06-10.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. It's time to expell him from the party
Period. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
72. First
he's not a Democrat - hasn't been for well over a year now.

Second, hwo does the party "expel" somebody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #72
121. tar and feathers?
boot kick through the double wide doors on the front steps?

i can think of a few ways to expel him...

;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
57. It won't make a difference. McCain is dead in the water. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Actually, he's not. He can easily be resuscitated come Super Tuesday.
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 04:10 PM by goldcanyonaz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. We'll see
McCain is absolutely awful. The idea of him as president makes me want to puke and the fact that he probably disgusts me the least out of all the GOP candidates should tell you something about the wretchedness of the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. He's not that popular here in Arizona any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
77. The kingmakes won't let him win
book it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
60. not a surprise to me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
61. Good. McCain can have him.
Now kick him the fuck out of our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
92. Not a Dem any more, Bluestater! Doncha remember? Ned Lamont beat him in the Dem
primary and Joe "gamed the system" as Ned put it, and had his little Independent run in his back pocket. Miserable S.O.B.!

Don't get me started...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
65. Well I didn't expect Lieberman to support Obama or Hillary that's for sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
68. Huckabeee is gaining too much momentum, if they want to slow him down they have to move now!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
73. Nearly blow up on his own ship, shot down, POW, skin cancer, wife cheatin
ending in divorce, second wife cheatin on him, smeared by schrubco in 2000 ending his best chance for CIC, publicly groped and frenched by chimp in 2004 to pander to base for '08 run, '08 run implodes due for not taking fascist enough stance on immigration.

And now . . .

Joementum

Guy can't catch a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. LOL. Nothing like a little Joementum to kill your campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
81. he is a turncoat
i doubt this is true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
83. How will this help him?
Most republicans remember Lieberman being on the democratic ticket in 2000. If this helps anyone it helps Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
85. And this is a surprise?
I suspect the only reason Joe, himself, hasn't crossed the aisle and officially become a republican is because the republicans don't trust him and won't have him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
96. So all of the DLC, let's compromise-with-the-reeps types
...who pooh-pooh Kucinich and Biden for not being MOR enough, do you think this helps your case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. Hell this is probably their idea of bipartisanship...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. More like this:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ribrepin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #99
119. Love the cartoon
The expressions on the donkey and elephant are perfection. The elephant is all shifty eyed and the donkey is clueless as he takes it up the ass.

Is this your own creation? If it is, it's really good.:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
101. Oh good lord.....is he bucking for another VP slot??
Just sad.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #101
122. Sure sounds like it. The "Unity Party" of Lieberman/McCain
:rofl: What an opportunist he is....:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
102. Not really surprising
He's been sucking up to McCain for years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
104. DUDE chill out... he's a Repug now.
Just cause he hasn't changed his party affiliation yet means nothing. Get over it, he's unimportant to us anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momto3 Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
107. Unbelievable!!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
108. If there's a member of Conn's election board here....
...can you please just forge Asshole's signature on his party affiliation declaration, R of course, and be done with it?

::sarcasm::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
110. Ain't it nice that Obama supports Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. Ain't it nice that Hillary cares more about fake violence than real violence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #110
114. Hillaristas always fail to note that Bill Clinton campaigned heavily for Lieberman
and that their "girl" Hillary would not even meet Ned Lamont in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
115. I could have sworn I heard Bill Clinton say that Joe was a good Democrat.
It's nice that they get screwed over by their own lack of loyalty to the cause. Of course, it would have been nicer having Senator Lamont, but Bill said Lieberman was just as good, and who am I to doubt the former President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
117. Can we kick this hateful war-monger out of the party after the election next year
I hate a traitor even more than some of the Bushco cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC