Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clintons trot out Lanny "Loving Lieberman" Davis to trash Obama.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:27 PM
Original message
Clintons trot out Lanny "Loving Lieberman" Davis to trash Obama.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lanny-davis/its-time-for-sen-obama-_b_76361.html

It's the same crap we've heard before--a combination of lies, half-truths and non-sequiturs.

Sample:

5. Your commitment to visit five dictators in your first year as president. In one of the Democratic debates, you committed to visiting five dictators in Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, Iran and North Korea, without preconditions, personally, in your first year as president. You later tried to revise what you actually said by stating you were referring only to the principle of the need to negotiate with "hostile governments." (But that is not what you said at the debate.) Then you criticized Sen. Clinton for not being willing to negotiate with hostile governments, which is false, and you knew it was false. In fact, you knew that Sen. Clinton had already endorsed the Hamilton-Kean task force recommendation for the U.S. to negotiate with Syria and Iran to assist in finding a regional solution to the Iraq war.


Typical Lieberscum sleaze--Obama said he would be WILLING to meet with them.

Anyhow, Lanny Davis is a former Lieberman advisor who called Joementum's critics 'bigots' and 'liars.' He's also a former member of the George W. Bush administration:

http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/12/livin-lovin-lieberman/

Lanny Davis also supported Ted Olson to be Attorney General.

http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/02/what-did-we-do-to-deserve-lanny-davis/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh No! That's
what bushites do..never met a cadaver they couldn't resurrect.

Gawd, that lanny davis is a worthless pos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Check out this from Woolcot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Too bad it's impossible
to cut and paste from Wolcott's blog..I'd like to show that part about lanny pos davis not wanting the Democrats to politicize the jack abramhoff case and let the facts of the case emerge.

Question, ok two..What the fuck is his agenda that he finds it necessary to wag his finger at Dems and why should they listen to him?

dlc dems=dinos who infiltrated and called themselves "dems"..thinking we're too dumb to see them for what they are..money grubbing, war mongering, lying sobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Obama needs the practice with responding to critical opinions.
If he wants the Big Chair.....then he will have to sharpen his debate skills. What a safe way to develope the techinque, with that of a peer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. Lanny Davis is a Pug-Lite goon, not a peer of Obama.
Quite frankly, Hillary's too good to be associating with trash like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Don't try to tell hillary
that..she'd never believe you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. I have no problem
with that..the problem is the scuzzbuckets the clintons hang out with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ugh.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. He did worse than that
He wrote a column in the WSJ accusing liberal blogs of "liberal McCarthyism" and posted a bunch of out-of-context quotes, attributing random commenters at various sites to the site itself. http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008763
Al Franken disposed of him here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQTW7DAOfcM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am going to say it: I think Hillary/Lieberman would be the ticket
I think Hillary would choose Lieberman as her running mate if she wins the nomination. It'd be the perfect triangulation move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. that's the ticket. Hillary and Joe
it will be Hillary/Joe
of course we will get the screamers and laughers - the no way crowd... but just look back even just this one year and see how we all got sold out by the dems. a perfect couple for wars and rumours of wars.
it's in the stars. so all this scrapping and shouting here is just for show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Of course she won't chose Lieberman
what a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. It was a joke, but like all good ones
It had an element of truth to it. I wouldn't be surprised if it actually happened...Hillary and Joe go way back. To his time running for the State senate in CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Yes, and Obama and Joe were tight too.
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 09:51 PM by seasonedblue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. I don't support Obama
But since I am voting on February 12th, I may vote for him. I will vote for whomever is left but Hillary at that point--even Mike Gravel. Hopefully, I will get to vote for my first choice, Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. It's your vote,
do with it what you want. I'll be voting for Clinton in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why does Obama run from what he said. Davis' account is absolutely the way I remember it.
That would be an odd coincidence had it not really happened that way, eh?


I'm glad this is back up again. We're not gonna have an effin microscope on Hillary and the others, and say, "oh well, that's not what he meant" for Obama. He did say he'd be willing to meet with those leaders, WITHOUT PRECONDITION, during his FIRST year in office. He did accuse Hillary of refusing to meet with those leaders, which is not what she said. He hasn't answered this, he's avoided and misdirected over it, tho.

Well within political rules to call someone on their own words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. Nice little bunch there..
you support.

lanny davis=dlc/dino/pos.

And, yeah, I hope this backfires on their "inevitability" hillary clinton think tank, asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #38
56. They're Obama's words.
That's the point some people are ignoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. And?
Big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. and told us to give GW a chance after her stoe the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mark Penn and Mandy Grunwald were working for Lieberman, too.
The REAL powers that be in the Clinton inner circle. I also recall Hillary 'donating' her communications guy, Wolfson, to Lamont after he won the primary and then Lamont camp started to have trouble getting their message out.

Sorry - but I don't believe in coincidences anymore when it comes to Bushes or Clintons and their loyalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. And I thought she
was being so helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. why is it "trash?" It is an accurate account of what happened
I am certain you would not suggest that we cannot question Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is he worse than Robert Gibbs,
Obama's spokesperson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes. Mega Lieberdem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sorry no,
I never saw anything more revolting than the hatchet job Gibbs did on Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Do you have a link?
Other than Jerome Armstrong of course. He provided no evidence Gibbs was involved in that ad and even avoided making the accusation. Gibbs was just group's spokesman.

Meanwhile, we know Davis was involved personally in a hatchet job on the liberal blogosphere, accusing us of being bigots and anti-semites. So I think he's worse, by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. My link would be to Jerome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh Lord! Can we please be done with the Clintons and all their slimy cronies?
It's like "Attaboy Brownie" redux...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Oh BS
Obama's no saint and he didn't hire apostles either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Lanny Davis is a special breed of awful.
A true Lieberdem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. Why..that would be a
repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
53. Lefty bloggers make me laugh
What a bunch of whiny crybabies they are. I read the article and it was very very tame. I expected all sorts of vile and nasty exaggerations.

So he's not a good Democrat because he was smart enough to see through Neddy Lamont and his stormtroopers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Man, some Obama supporters really like to compare Hillary to the bush gang.
This one is new.

But hell, Obama likes doing it, why not his supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. That's because half of them are probably Bush supporters themselves
Only a Bush supporter would attack the top running Democrat like they do. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. That's funny because I thought it was only Chimpy's myrmidonic lock-step loyalists who
challenged people's right to protest a political figurehead. I guess some now think Queen Hill is beyond reproach. Sounding more and more repugish every day...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. They are flip sides of the same corroded coin. Ack...
Had enough? Fuck yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Obama has (on some days) many of the same positions as Hillary. You've fallen for an illusion.
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 09:12 PM by Skip Intro
Sorry to break it to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Who said anything about "issues"?
This is about the Clintonian personality defects...and their sorry style of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. Was there something inaccurate in the OP? Why shoot the messenger?
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 09:34 PM by Skip Intro
It's not just a river in Egypt, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
58. Obama believes in closed government that protects secrecy and privilege of BushInc?
Are you sure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Unlike McClurkin's hero, Obama, Hillary has no slimy cronies. It's not her fault Obama's a hypocrite
and that somebody pointed it out accurately. Lots of people do it everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. Lanny, Penn, and Wolfson...Is there a more smarmier trio in American politics today?
:puke:-er-amma...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. Well, if you want to be technical..
there's rove, limpballs, and beck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Really?
A guy that busts unions is her chief strategist and a guy that love Lieberman (who, by the way, is himself very close to Hillary) and doesn't want Democrats to "politicize" the Abramoff case is one of her best buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm not an Obama fan, but Lanni Davis is really the most disgusting
creature one can imagine!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. The guy makes tons of accurate condemnations of Obama. Good article. I thought you liked Obama, btw
Wow, does that guy ever show what a hypocrite Obama has been, especially concerning the war. Thanks for posting this, geek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Actually, the bit about the war is interesting
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 09:17 PM by BeyondGeography
because, if Lanny is to be believed, eight times Obama refused to trash his Senate colleagues.

I would like to see the 2004 campaign quote in context. The "I don't know" quote that gets the most publicity came in response to a question put to Obama by Russert after he was elected and was phrased like this: What made you smarter on this issue than all of your Democratic colleagues who voted for it? Obama refused to bite then and subsequently.

It should also be noted that Hillary was one of the Senators whose reputation Obama was trying to protect, that's right, protect, when he punted on Russert's question. Obama's reward for that good deed, yes, good deed, was to have Bill bring it up on the campaign trail and Lanny here again with his screed. No surprise, all's fair in love and war and all that. But anyone who uses the Russert quote to call Obama a hyprocrite on IWR is guilty of pure ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. The real reason he's a hypocrite is because he continues to vote to fund the war
while preaching how he's the only viable anti-war candidate. Everyone knows that if Obama was in the Senate when the IWR came up for voting, he would've voted AYE just like Hillary, Biden, Edwards, and Dodd. That much is obvious.

Regardless, you don't go preaching how you're the only candidate of the senaators who's against the war and then vote yes to keep the war going every time a vote to fund the war comes up. Like Kucinich says, they could stop the war in a month if they all just voted to stop the funding, but hypocrites like Obama say one thing and do another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Everyone doesn't know that; half of the Democrats in the Senate voted against it
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 09:23 PM by BeyondGeography
including Durbin, whose vote, when Obama was asked about IWR in November of 2002, he says he would have followed.

The one fact that you'll never be able to get away from is that Obama made a clear speech against IWR and the war in October of 2002. Among the things he said was that the threat from Saddam and Iraq did not warrant a reciprocal threat of invasion from the U.S. Had he been wrong in that statement, nobody outside of Illinois ever would have heard of Barack Obama. He stuck his neck out and was right. The rest is word games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Davis makes his living trashing his own party
and sucking up to Republicans.

He was a member of Chimpy's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. Yeah, lanny davis is up
for sale..smooth talkin' A$$hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. Yeah let's start; "slinging the mud" go Hillary you're our girl (or somebody's?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
48. Oh, I take back my criticism. I forgot DilldO'Reilly hearts Lanny...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Both are mediawhores..
"On the August 8 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly stated that "the far left in America is dominated by haters, people who despise their own country," adding that "he smear merchants are now all over the mainstream media and have spread like lice on the net." O'Reilly cited an op-ed in the August 8 edition of The Wall Street Journal by Lanny J. Davis, a former special counsel to President Clinton, which quoted from weblog posts that Davis characterized as full of "extremism, bigotry and intolerance." O'Reilly addressed "anti-Semitic stuff directed at Joe Lieberman " in his "Talking Points Memo" and read from two of the weblog quotes Davis had included in his Journal op-ed. But read in context, one of the quotations O'Reilly cited was clearly a parody of an anti-Semitic rant and both were from comments posted to the weblogs O'Reilly mentioned. Neither O'Reilly nor Davis cited any evidence that either commenter spoke for anyone in the progressive community or indeed that the commenter is actually a progressive."

"O'Reilly and Davis simply misrepresented a comment by tomjones that appeared on the Daily Kos website on December 7, 2005. The initial comment, followed by tomjones's reply, went as follows:

Why Should Joe Care ... about a bunch of goyim dying in Iraq? It's not like anybody he cares about is suffering as a direct result of the war."


Thank the Uni for mediamatters!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
55. It says he's a supporter and fundraiser for Hillary - but is he a PART of her
campaign? Is he actually affiliated with the campaign or the Clintons? I didn't read all the posts, but from what I scanned, I don't see a real connection between them. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
57. I like Joe Lieberman. When he's asleep, the problem is that he doesn't
sleep enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. I'd like him better if he was a vampire.
That way, he'd sleep during the hours I watch television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Know whatcha mean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
59. "same crap we've heard before--a combination of lies, half-truths and non-sequiturs."
From EdwbamaNation, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC