Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Joins Holy Joe and Brownback To Resurrect the Culture Wars - Takes on "Manhunt 2"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:08 PM
Original message
Hillary Joins Holy Joe and Brownback To Resurrect the Culture Wars - Takes on "Manhunt 2"
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 05:09 PM by jefferson_dem
Now here's some principled leadership we can all be proud of. 'Atta girl, Hillary. You go get those evil video games!

Hillary Clinton Joins Joe Lieberman To Resurrect the Culture Wars
Posted December 10, 2007 | 03:28 PM (EST)

I guess this must be one for those of us who spent the 90s wanting to throw large objects through the television set as we watched that sanctimonious, finger wagging, judgmental scold Joe Lieberman on the floor of the Senate joining with the Republicans to derail the constitution over Bill Clinton's zipper:

Senators Joe Lieberman (ID-CT), Sam Brownback (R-KS), Evan Bayh (D-IN), and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) called for a thorough review of the video game ratings process in the wake of "Manhunt 2" receiving a "Mature" rating. In a letter to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB), the Senators detailed how the change in rating opened the door to widespread release of the game, which depicts acts of horrific violence.

Well that is just peachy. Do we suppose Hillary sat down and actually played Manhunt 2 on the campaign trail in order to arrive at this conclusion, or did she just take Joe's word for it, much like she did when she voted for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment that others have quite rightly pilloried her for? Because Joe, you'll recall, was a useful idiot for the Bushies when they discovered Iran had no nuclear weapons program and they had to find another reason to bomb them into the stone age -- something they neglected to tell the public about. And despite the fact that Clinton's excuse for voting for the AUMF was that she had "bad information" from the Bush Administration on the Iraq weapons program, she decided to trust them -- and Lieberman -- and amp up the Iran war rhetoric.

One wonders at what point she will stop following Lieberman over the cliff.

<SNIP>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/hillary-clinton-joins-joe_b_76133.html

FULL TEXT of Hillary's presser on this pressing issue is hosted on Holy Joe's site -- http://lieberman.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=287809
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. GK already beat you to the latest smear by assocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ooops. Thanks for pointing that out.
We wouldn't want any "smear by association" here on DU, would we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. where's the smear there? she's with holy joe on this one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't think that's a smear.
She did sign that letter, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. In the world of Hill's Shills...
...any inconvenient fact becomes a "smear." :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am sure that slick high priced consultants
are involved in the decision making to go after this complete non-issue. Like the Fake War on Drugs Not Produced and Marketed By Big Pharma, it is Panderland, a glorious opportunity to take a STRONG STAND on an issue that nobody wants to risk opposing. It makes me very unproud to be a Democrat, to know that we stand for so little, that we have no spine, that our principles are whatever the consultants tell our candidate plays well with their focus groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC