Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud: NAFTA proves Edwards right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:04 AM
Original message
U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud: NAFTA proves Edwards right
NAFTA proves Edwards right
By Mike Michaud
Commentary--New Hampshire Union Leader
Sunday, December 9, 2007

----
FOURTEEN YEARS ago yesterday, on December 8, 1993, the Clinton administration signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) into law. We have all seen its devastating impact directly: more than a million jobs lost, factories across America shut down and shipped overseas, and entire communities destroyed.

We are now a generation trapped by stagnant wages. Men in their thirties today earn less after inflation than their fathers' generation 30 years ago, forcing families to work harder.

NAFTA has also contributed to an economy that continues to only grow for those at the top. Income inequality is at its greatest level since 1928. Forty percent of economic growth over the past 20 years has gone to the top 1 percent of households. In 2005, income grew 14 percent for the top 1 percent but was stagnant for the bottom 90 percent -- that means millions of working American families struggled to increase their income. If all Americans shared in prosperity to the same extent they did 30 years ago, 80 percent of American families would be earning $7,000 more a year.

In our region, the impact of NAFTA and similar free trade deals has meant that the mills that have been the backbone of the economy are slowly closing their doors. Tragically, some of the only jobs workers can get in the North Country now are tearing down the very mills they used to work in.

Before joining Congress in 2003, I was proud to work at the Great Northern Paper Company in East Millinocket for almost 30 years, like my father and grandfather before me. I have watched the closing of the mills in Berlin and Groveton this year with deep sadness. It is an outrage that our own trade policies have led to so many jobs being lost, the deconstruction of the American middle class, and the rapid decline of America's proud manufacturing tradition.

This election is an enormous opportunity for our country. We have the chance to turn around these failed policies that put corporate profits ahead of American workers so we can rebuild our middle class and create more jobs here in America. That is why I am supporting John Edwards for President.
(...)
Before he signs a trade deal, John Edwards will ask one simple question: Is this deal good for American workers? He will never pass a trade deal that does not include strict -- and enforceable -- labor and environmental standards.

Edwards will also be a President who fights to level the playing field for American workers. He will assign top prosecutors at the U.S. Department of Justice to the job of enforcing trade laws, including the stronger labor and environment standards he will negotiate. He will also go after illegal trade subsidies and insist that China and other countries move toward ending manipulation of their currencies, seeking WTO sanctions if necessary.

But beyond the specifics of his plans, I also support John Edwards because he has been fighting and beating these big corporate interests his entire life. I know he will not capitulate or triangulate when he gets to Washington -- he will fight for us every hour of every day with everything he's got.
(...)
One month from today, I hope New Hampshire voters will pick the man who will stand up for them -- John Edwards.

Mike Michaud is a Democratic U.S. representative from Maine.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Mike+Michaud%3A+NAFTA+proves+Edwards+right&articleId=dc7f5147-f2fa-46d5-b996-3c5e426ab068


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's my Congressman!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. How much is directly attributable to NAFTA?
Many, if not most of the jobs shipped overseas have gone to China/India and other places that we do not have free trade agreements with.

How many jobs were shifted to Mexico INSTEAD of China because of NAFTA? How many Mexicans are still in Mexico BECAUSE of NAFTA providing them with good paying jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Answer: Not Much
The reality is that NAFTA was and is a good idea. You think illegal immigration is bad? Imagine what it would be like if NAFTA hadn't passed. No, the real job sucking sound came when China was let into the WTO, not when the doors were opened to Canada and Mexico...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Illegal Immigration has greatly accelerated post-NAFTA...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. And how much is that due to China sucking up alot of Mexico's jobs, as well
People don't seem to realize that many factories in Mexico also closed - to move to China. China undercuts EVERYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good point. It still doesn't follow that NAFTA *discourages* illegal immigration
Most people argue exactly the opposite: NAFTA has decimated the ability of small family farmers to make a living in Mexico, due to the flood of cheap, government subsidized corn from US growers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. hadn't thought of that
Good point. And of course, many of the farming areas that benefitted are up in arms about all them damn furriners around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Exactly
It was the China WTO deal that changed everything, not NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Good point; and Edwards voted for trade with China
so he wasn't right.

Kucinich was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Will Edwards apologize for his vote to extend permanent "free trade" to China?
His silence on the matter is most troubling. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Which has been a killer
I support free/fair trade, which we do not have with China. China has not allowed us the same access to their markets as we allow to ours.

And I also beleive that to be free/fair trade, the labor/environmental standards must be the same in each country. Otherwise, it is not fair trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. This is why Edwards' workers' rights bona fides are suspect.
NOT just because of his past mistakes or his quick-and-easy conversion from a centrist DLC Democrat to a self-described populist.

But primarily because he won't renounce MFN for China and NAFTA./
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick'd and rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC