Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Define: "triangulation" nt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:43 PM
Original message
Define: "triangulation" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary Clinton?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wow, and here I thought it was Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's what Obama says Hillary does --
--even though he does it way more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Having a position that most of the people have too.
And stating that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. triangulation:
noun: A method of determining the relative positions of points in space by measuring the distances, and sometimes angles, between those points and other reference points whose positions are known.

It works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revolve Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here it is
1. a technique for establishing the distance between any two points, or the relative position of two or more points, by using such points as vertices of a triangle or series of triangles, such that each triangle has a side of known or measurable length (base or base line) that permits the size of the angles of the triangle and the length of its other two sides to be established by observations taken either upon or from the two ends of the base line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Apparently, triangulation is the naughty word of the hour.
It means whatever someone wants it to mean as long as it is applied to the candidate the other guy supports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Depends on who you ask.
I think what we're looking for here are definitions that apply to interpersonal dynamics and/or politics.

So here we go:

Interpersonal dynamics: ...people respond to anxiety between each other by shifting the focus to a third person, triangulation. In a triangle, two are on the inside and one is on the outside. For example, rather than talk with her husband about and deal with her frustration with him, a new mother might preoccupy herself with her new child. In this case, the wife diminishes her anxiety by ignoring its source (the relationship between her and her husband); the husband is on the outside and the wife and child are on the inside.

Similarly, in the same situation, instead of talk with his wife about their marriage and deal with his frustration with her, the husband might spend more time at work instead. He would thus be making work as the inside relationship excluding his wife.

In either example, though anxiety is reduced, neither husband or wife resolve the source of their anxiety.



Politics: By extension, "triangulation" has been used to describe a perceived political strategy pursued successfully by U.S. President Bill Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair (and unsuccessfully by Australian Labor leader Mark Latham). In these terms, it could be summarised as akin to the Hegelian theory of synthesis in which apparently contradictory elements of the Left and the Right are reconciled. For instance, government versus the market, rights versus responsibilities, are synthesised into a theoretically homogeneous whole. This has been branded by Blair the "Third Way" (also known as "New Labour"). In political circles, however, it has become a "fuzzword" similar to "thinking outside the square".


More explanation of different forms of triangulation and examples are _here_.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I like your term, "fuzzword" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Wikipedia's term, not mine.
But I like it, too.

I was told once in the past that I was "triangulating" and in the context that it was said, to this day I still have no idea what the person meant. The only thing I'm sure of is that it was intended as an insult.

Use of the term as a general insult without specific explanation most certainly qualifies it as a "fuzzword."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. FBI Cellphone Trace n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Triangulation (n):
The act of forwarding a political viewpoint that differs from those supported by the speaker, or of failing to adequately support a political viewpoint supported by the speaker.

Unrelated to previous political meaning. c.f. "treason."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think it originally was a fancy term for "compromise" but that now many
use it to indicate that a statement is so confusing that it can support opposite interpretations simultaneously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Originally, its meaning was not quite one of compromise.
It was the act of presenting your positions as "above" the traditional left-right spectrum, or perhaps as between them. For instance, a fantastic example was Obama's recent speech to the 700 Club, in which he presented a defense of abortion rights that drew heavily on the concept of prayer, personal responsibility, and faith in the ability of one's fellow man (and woman) to do what was right. In doing so, he presented abortion rights as not a left-vs-right issue, but rather as a universal issue that all could support.

An alternate method of triangulation is selective omission and emphasis of aspects of a multifaceted platform. Say Hillary Clinton supports a health-care plan that offers tax breaks for purchasing mandatory health insurance. In doing so, she can refer to its universal nature to gain support among the left half of the spectrum, and can refer to its market-based nature to appeal to the right half. While speaking to an audience of liberals, she can talk about how she intends to see every American with affordable healthcare. While speaking to an audience of conservatives, she can talk about how she wants to allow the market to maximize efficiency of the system. That, too, would be triangulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:17 PM
Original message
Bingo - you've captured the two different meanings assigned to triangulation!
I'd use the term compromise for the first meaning, but I'm not sure what word captures the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. The reason why I wouldn't call the Obama example compromise is
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 08:38 PM by Occam Bandage
that he is not giving anything up. He has presented a defense of full abortion rights. A traditional compromise would be if Obama said, okay, well, I agree abortion can be bad, but I think we should have some abortions because it can be necessary, so we'll ban partial-birth abortions and make the woman have to sit through some lectures first. That would be a compromise--give some, keep some.

Here, though, he has indeed found a common ground, but his common ground is one that leads to adopting his position completely. I would call this triangulating the issue. He has "given up" rhetorical ground, but has (hopefully) led to greater support for the issue.

For comparison, the Clinton example is (these are my terms) triangulating the policy, in which she gives up some ideological ground in compromise for broader potential support of a particular policy. This also allows her to easily triangulate the issue, as she can defend a moderate proposal to a liberal or a conservative audience by adopting their terminology.

Finally, Clinton triangulates the candidate. She frequently gives up rhetorical and ideological ground in high-profile yet low-impact situations (Kyl-Lieberman, most recently), in order to portray herself as a hawkish candidate to hawkish audiences, yet still point to her generally dovish (emphasis on generally) record to dovish audiences.

Those would be, IMO, the three forms of triangulation. To recap, I propose a hierarchy that runs rhetoric-ideology-policy-candidate. Triangulation is adopting your opponent's stance on any of these, for the benefit of anything to the right of whichever category you have chosen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Finding common ground vs compromising - a subtle difference
that I appreciate you pointing out.

I think your comments of triangulation are also worth thinking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Best explanation of all!
You've made it clear as crystal now in both its forms.

Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Example: Guns or Butter (develop weapons or produce civilian goods/services)
Solution: Build golf courses for generals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Terrific example!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. At one time, was triangulation considered a good thing, something a
a savvy politician would engage in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I would think so.
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 08:14 PM by silverweb
It would seem that with diplomacy, statesmanship, and responsible compromise, people of opposing viewpoints would be able to steer a course that satisfied most of their mutual concerns.

I think it's a safe assumption that most treaties and other mutually satisfactory agreements are reached by such a form of "triangulation" -- though this word now has negative connotations and I'd prefer to use "diplomacy" and "statesmanship" for such positive applications.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Certainly. Dick Morris invented the term to explain Clinton's successful strategy
of co-opting Republican phrases and policies on the campaign trail, thus disarming his opponents. Blair successfully did as well, Bush did it also in 2000 as a "compassionate conservative."

After he got elected, Bush returned America to governing via wedge issues and hyperpartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Playing a triangle to bring on the festive spirit of the season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You nut!
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Needs more cowbell, IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Triangulation is a poll tested word that gets a negative reaction from people who don't know...
...what it means. Speechwriters like to drop it into the slow bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. There is a post describing Obama as a triangulator by which
the poster means to suggest that Obama flip flops or obscures his stands.


I believe the proper term for this style post is projection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. That poster is using the word incorrectly -
- but like all major candidates Obama has flip flopped and does obscure his positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Always Staying Slightly To The Left/Right Of Your Opponent
Triangulation is taking a position somewhat to the opposite side (e.g., somewhat to the Republican side if you're a Democrat).

Triangulation works like this: suppose you're a Democratic candidate running against a Republican. If you take a slightly right wing position, Democrats will still vote for you rather than the Republican, of course. And by being somewhat to the Right, you'll also capture the votes of right-leaning moderates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Very good explanation.
Your definition also explains how triangulation can be done either honestly or dishonestly, in a spirit of finding common ground or with an intent to deceive.

I understand it now and I understand why the Wikipedia author called it a "fuzzword." It sure is, as it can be easily used to accuse, confuse, and bamboozle.

Gotta run for now... thanks! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. Thanks for this thread, hedgehog.
I'd never quite understood the term "triangulation" the way it's used these days, but I'd also never taken the time to really research it and think about it in order to clarify it in my own mind.

You and the other posters here this evening have remedied that deficit in my understanding, for which I'm very appreciative.

Now dinner break's over and it's back to work! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wasn't the word 'Triangulation' created specifcally for Bill Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I think it was, originally but that it has undergone rapid evolution
and acquired several different albeit related meanings in recent months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. Where corporate democrats meet corporate republiks to mollify the
reich-wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Voting for Kyl-Liberman while claiming that you're doing everything in your power to stop Bush
from starting a war with Iran? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. Best definition:
Triangulation... seems to involve extracting, from each side, the most ridiculous and indefensible part of the position and saying that you are against that and a resolution ought to be achieved without it. If done well, this does not really hurt the politician doing it because the issue so rejected is so ridiculous that, exposed and standing alone, that position is not defensible in the MSM or elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC