Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Young wants Obama to be President in 2016 theres only one problem with that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:38 PM
Original message
Andrew Young wants Obama to be President in 2016 theres only one problem with that
if a democrat wins in 09 and is reelected in 2012 who ever the Vice President is more than likely will want to run and will get the nomination handed down to them thats just how the system seems to work. Obama can't win going against a sitting Vice President running for President. so Andrew Young is misinform a little bit about Presidential politics. in my opinion if he looses the nomination this is the only chance he will get to run i see no scenario IN THE NEAR FUTURE where he gets to run again and win.if the rethug party wins again in 09 and has eight years thats the only other shot i see he has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Become Hillary's VP
That would solve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not happening because first of all she's not winnin g either in 09
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Good.
Hillary will be President, and we won't have to worry about Obama's future for a long time.

At 46 years old , it's not like there's a ticking clock.

I'd like him to be President AFTER he has experience, and AFTER the more experienced clean up the mess Bush has made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well if experience is yor main thing for not voting for him then why are you not voting for Dodd or
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 08:04 PM by bigdarryl
Biden Hillary's claim to fame is she is married to Bill and was first lady if that is the new criteria for being President than that means Laura Bush is qualified to be President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Hmm... still waiting for the answer.
*crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Hillary as First Lady
does not equal Laura Bush as First Lady.

A closer analogy would Eleanor Roosevelt.

And I'm not for Dodd or Biden because I don't think they have the stuff to win this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. hillary is not more experienced!
And the experience she has is sucking up to Bush! IWR. Kyl-Lieberman. Et al.

We don't need her type of experience.

Obama will have 8 years elected experience....2 in washington, and 6 in Illinois state congress.

Lincoln had 8 years elected experience...2 in washington, and 6 in Illinois state congress.

I guess Lincoln obviously did not have enough experience for the task! sarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Please
You obviously don't even know where Obama stands on the K/L issues.

As far as his 8 years of "experience", from where I'm sitting, he appears to have done nothing with it and over half of it has been running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Obama was opposed to Kyl-Lieberman
The vote was re-scheduled so he couldn't vote. Get over it already! I know his stands. Take up the vote schedule with Reid.

Well, if you are right, Obama has been running for president for four years. I doubt that. But look at your hero Hillary! She has been running for president for decades.

And what has Hillary to show for her Senate career? What key chairmanships? What chairmanships at all? What bills did she sponsor (as opposed to co-sponsor)? She has a lack luster performance as a Senator. Voted FOR IWR. Voted FOR Kyl-Lieberman. Voted FOR bankruptcy bill.

Hillary has been running for president for a long time. The charitable conclusion is she sucked up to the establishment in order to curry favor. The less charitable conclusion is that she is establishment through and through anyway. In any case, what you see is what you get with Hillary: more of the same divisive politics that has torn our country and our party apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. hillary will not win...so Obama would not be helped
While Obama would help Hillary's ticket, it is more likely that Obama will get the nomination. Hillary as VP would NOT help Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Then I guess Obama
is shit out of luck.

He jumped the gun on running before ready.

Sad. He might've made a good President one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Too bad about hillary....she never would been elected president some day
Come off it! Are you still trying to sell that bag of goods that Obama is not ready? Why? Because you say so? Oh...I see!

Obama is not shit out of luck. He is challenging Hillary's supposedly inevitable lead. Hillary's campaign is in the midst of reorganization because of panic mode.

I would say it more likely that Hillary is out of luck. You can use the shit word all you want...doesn't make you have any more verbal acuity than a doughnut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. We all know what fine presidents Al Gore, Hubert Humphrey, Fritz Mondale, and Spiro Agnew made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well we would have known what a fine president Al Gore would make
had the Supreme Court not committed treason. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Sorta gets away from the concept that the sitting VP is a shoo-in for the next prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Not at all
The sitting VP in that case WAS a shoo-in for the next President. Then the treason occurred. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revolve Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well I hope you vote for your canidates in 09
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 07:56 PM by revolve
Because im voting for mine in 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not only that, but if Hillary "wins" in 2008, it means the fix is in PERMANENTLY
And there will be a Bush "elected" in 2016. So then Obama would have to change his name to Clinton in order to even be eligible for 2028, by which time Chelsea will probably be installed as nominee anyway.

Don't think it can happen?

Let's NOT find out. Stop this "dynasty" bullshit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. what dynasty bullshit
Hillary happens to be one of the most qualified candidates this year

who cares if she was married to a two-term president

she's all the more qualified since she was married to a two-term president


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. going up in the general election shes the least quilified out of Rudy Romney or even Huckaberry
the experience thing will hunt the democratic party in the general election if she is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. She's less qualified than Rudy??
A mayor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. a mayor is an executive position....
the last time Hillary was the HEAD of anything was way back when she was president of the Young Republicans!

I think this experience thing is absurd. All of our candidates have enough experience to be president! The real issue is who is the best to lead us into a new direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. As much as I despise Rudy 9u11iani
As mayor of NYC, he was leading an executive branch serving a larger population than Bill Clinton (or Mike Huckabee) did as governor of Arkansas.

And besides, I can't discount mayors, since I'm supporting a former mayor myself :evilgrin:
(NOT Rudy!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Kucinich is has far more than mayoral exp.
plus he knows what the Constitution is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. kucinich would make a great president !
What a change from a hillary presidency.

I honestly think kucinich is more electable than hillary. I have totally given up on Hillary winning in the general. I think it is Democrat who have given up on Kucinich. If he was actually nominated, he could win. It would take some work. But, if nothing else, his nomination would give some definition to our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. going up in the general election shes the least qualified out of Rudy Romney or even Huckleberry
Edited on Sun Dec-09-07 08:13 PM by bigdarryl
the experience thing will hunt the democratic party in the general election if she is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. How in the blue blazes of fuck is Hillary "most qualified"???
She's got 6 years in the senate. Period. You can argue that against Obama or Edwards, but it hardly makes her "most qualified".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. self-delete
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 09:06 PM by earthlover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Nonsense
There will never be another Bush elected in this country, not after what the current one did. There is no dynasty, we have free elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. Sure we have free elections.
Tell that to the people of Florida and Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Edwards/Obama '08
Can produce a very promising Obama 2016, and he'll still only be in his 50's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red2blue Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. If there is one thing we can all agree on ....
We will all be proud to say President Obama in 2016.

I know none of you poll watchers will agree with me.

However i see Edwards/Obama in 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginchinchili Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. If Biden wins the nomination, Obama would be his logical choice for VP.
That way Obama, a smart inexperienced guy, could learn from Biden, a smart experienced guy, and Obama would almost certainly be president in 2016. In fact, I think Andrew is right on the money. It's the most logical thing for the Democratic Party and our nation, and Biden is a very logical guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. You are right. Obama could be VP in 2016, not President
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 01:16 AM by Tactical Progressive
Eight more years in Washington, assuming he makes something of them, should just about give him the credentials for a VP.

That's what he was on track for, before he turned around and spit in his party's face. Obama hasn't the credentials, hasn't earned, nor does he deserve by any calculus a real shot at the Presidency in 2008. I think his low-class performance in this election cycle could well throw him off the Democratic fast-track.

His 2016 shot at a VP nomination and consequently 2024 Presidential run might already be over. I personally think he's earned such a fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC