Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton's Role in the Mortgage Crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:53 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton's Role in the Mortgage Crisis
"Many Democrats wish Bill Clinton still occupied the White House. However, before you put him in Mt. Rushmore, you might want to investigate his role in the mortgage foreclosure crisis.

The chief aim of what I have termed the Republican Counterrevolution has always been to roll back the New Deal. Anti-gov'ment rhetoric hides this as surely as states' rights hid racist segregation. Of all the New Deal legislation the GOP has sought to overturn, one that has always been at or near the top of the list is the Glass-Steagall Act. Ironically, a Democratic president repealed this for them."
.....

Billionaire Sanford I. Weill, who according to Louis Uchitelle made "Citigroup into the most powerful financial institution since the House of Morgan a century ago," has what I call the Wall of Me leading to his office, which he has decorated with tributes to him, including a dozen framed magazine covers. A major trophy is the pen Bill Clinton used to sign the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, a move which allowed Weill to create Citigroup. Fittingly, Citigroup is a major contributor to guess which current Democratic Presidential candidate?



More at

http://www.progressivehistorians.com/2007/11/bill-clintons-role-in-mortgage-crisis.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, he did.
I remember screaming at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Citi
His friend Rubin is a leader at citi, and they have just taken over aeromexico for practically nothing, with the Mex. govt. doing the financing. Citi may be bigger thieves then Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'd forgotten that....
Edited on Mon Dec-03-07 01:11 AM by Armstead
but now that you reminded me, it's just another of the reasons I wish people would think twice before putting another Clinton in the White House.

Wall St. already has one political party. They don't need two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting, thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reno.Muse Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here are the assclowns who sold people down the river on the bankruptcy bill in 05
snip...

Thursday :: Mar 10, 2005
Harry Reid and 17 Other Democratic Senators Sell Out Consumers To Pass Bankruptcy Bill Today

by Steve Soto

The sell-out is complete. The bankruptcy bill just passed.

With 18 Democratic votes. And our Minority Leader was one of the culprits.

Democratic senators just voted to throw consumers overboard for banking and credit card companies in order to collect more campaign contributions from people who will still bankroll opponents against them anyway. There was a far more effective counterstrategy available here, like fighting predatory lending practices and reinstating usury laws. But the Democrats never went near that. But at least they tried to point out how the bill favored the wealthy. Even if it was going to pass anyway, Democrats didn't need to help it along and could have used this against the GOP next year as part of a larger pro-consumer plank in the 2006 midterms. They can't do that now, especially with their "leader" selling out also.

Some of these folks did it to collect cash and because they were afraid for their reelections next year. Others, who are safe, did it for no good reason except money and ambition. And none of them thought long and hard about consumers.

Let Dick Durbin have the caucus. Harry Reid lost me today with this vote.

These are the Democrats who sold out consumers today for their pieces of silver. May each one of them rot in hell.

Blanche Lincoln-Arkansas (kiss off 2008 you piece of garbage)
David Pryor-Arkansas
Ken Salazar, Colorado (not up for reelection until 2010)
Joe Biden-Delaware (kiss off 2008 you piece of garbage)
Tom Carper-Delaware (owes his ass to MBNA)
Bill Nelson-Florida (up for reelection next year)
Daniel Inouye-Hawaii
Evan Bayh-Indiana (kiss off 2008 you piece of garbage)
Mary Landrieu-Louisiana (forget anything national, lady)
Debbie Stabenow-Michigan (I had my fill of you too)
Max Baucus-Montana (he'll cave now on Social Security)
Ben Nelson-Nebraska (up for reelection next year)
Harry Reid-Nevada (let Kerry or Durbin have the caucus)
Jeff Bingaman-New Mexico
Hillary-abstaining (Bill's in the hospital)
Kent Conrad-North Dakota
Tim Johnson-South Dakota (owes his ass to Citibank)
Robert Byrd-West Virginia
Herb Kohl-Wisconsin (up for reelection next year)

snip ...

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/003879.php

Clever how Hillary missed the vote or, er, abstained.

But she was there in 2001 when bankruptcy reform was first started:

"Among Senate Democrats who may vote for the bankruptcy bill are Minority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.), whose state is home to a Citigroup Inc. credit card operation in Sioux Falls that employs several thousand people. Daschle has received $45,000 in political contributions from Citigroup in the last six years." -- Washington Post 3/11/01

The Associated Press is calling it a big win for Bush and "the second business-friendly measure to pass both houses of the new Congress".

And they wonder why Ralph Nader got so many Democratic votes?

The Sell Outs:

Daniel Akaka (Hawaii) senator@akaka.senate.gov
Max Baucus (Montana) http://www.senate.gov/~baucus/EmailMax.htm
Evan Bayh (Indiana) http://bayh.senate.gov/webmail.html
Joe Biden (Delaware) senator@biden.senate.gov
Jeff Bingaman (New Mexico) senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov
John Breaux (Louisiana) senator@breaux.senate.gov
Robert Byrd (West Virginia) senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov
Maria Cantwell (Washington) http://cantwell.senate.gov/mailform.html
Jean Carnahan (Missouri) senator_carnahan@carnahan.senate.gov
Thomas Carper (Delaware) http://carper.senate.gov/
Max Cleland (Georgia) http://www.senate.gov/~cleland/webform.html
Hillary Clinton (New York) senator@clinton.senate.gov
Kent Conrad (North Dakota) senator@conrad.senate.gov
Tom Daschle (Sorth Dakota) http://daschle.senate.gov/webform.htm
Byron Dorgan (North Dakota) senator@dorgan.senate.gov
John Edwards (North Carolina) http://www.senate.gov/~edwards/contact.html
Dianne Feinstein (California) senator@feinstein.senate.gov
Bob Graham (Florida) bob_graham@graham.senate.gov
Fritz Hollings (South Carolina) http://www.senate.gov/~hollings/webform.html
Daniel Inouye (Hawaii) http://www.senate.gov/~inouye/webform.html
Tim Johnson (South Dakota) tim@johnson.senate.gov
Herb Kohl (Wisconsin) senator_kohl@kohl.senate.gov
Mary Landrieu (Louisiana) http://landrieu.senate.gov/webform.html
Patrick Leahy (Vermont) senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
Carl Levin (Michigan) senator@levin.senate.gov
Joe Lieberman (Connecticut) senator_lieberman@lieberman.senate.gov
Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas) blanche_lincoln@lincoln.senate.gov
Barbara Mikulski (Maryland) senator@mikulski.senate.gov
Zell Miller (Georgia) http://miller.senate.gov/email.htm
Patty Murray (Washington) senator_murray@murray.senate.gov
Ben Nelson (Nebraska) http://www.senate.gov/senators/ben_nelson.html
Harry Reid (Nevada) senator_reid@reid.senate.gov
Chuck Schumer (New York) senator@schumer.senate.gov
Debbie Stabenow (Michigan) senator@stabenow.senate.gov
Robert Torricelli (New Jersey) senator_torricelli@torricelli.senate.gov
Ron Wyden (Oregon) http://wyden.senate.gov/mail.htm

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/0316-03.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think you need to re-post that info. nt
I'd like to find out how the bill changed from 2001 to 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. So how do you feel about your candidate voting for it in
2001? Wasn't he a sellout too? Why shouldn't he "rot in hell" ?

And by the way, I think the rot in hell line is just ridiculous. And criticizing Clinton for being with Bill while he had heart surgery is silly.

John Edward's hardly has anything to boast of from his 6 years in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The bill may have changed between 2001 and 2005. If not, the
candidate may have changed. If someone says they made a mistake, I can go along with that. If someone denies that they made a mistake or pretends that something never happened, that's a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. from what I understand the bill was lousy in 2001
And I can accept apologies- to a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I can also accept that someone may have looked around and gotten disgusted
enough to quit working with the system and gamble everything on a chance to change the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I can too, but the fact that Edwards worked part time for
Fortress- a sleazy Hedgefund- in 2005, argues against that point.
And he got a fat paycheck for lending them his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think it's more important that he is working to change the situation
than that he may have taken advantage of it at this time. Warren Buffet got rich working the system, but he's dumping his money into improving life for third world people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Edwards voted against the Wellstone amendment in the 2001
Bankruptcy bill which would have provided more protection for people seeking relief from medical bills as well as voting for the bill itself. In 2005 he said that his 2001 vote for the Bankruptcy bill was a mistake, and voting against the Wellstone amendment???

Wellstone Pushes To Protect Americans Hit by Huge Medical Bills From Unbalanced, Unfair Bankruptcy ‘Reform’ Bill

http://www.commondreams.org/news2001/0307-13.htm

"...We know that in the vast majority of cases bankruptcy is a drastic step taken by families in desperate financial circumstances and overburdened by debt. Specifically we know that nearly half of all debtors report that high medical costs forced them into bankruptcy – this is an especially serious problem for the elderly,” Wellstone said..."


April 2001

http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/25/10/nelson2510.html

"...Consumer advocates say the bill unfairly deprives many heavily indebted, low-income Americans of their only protection against financial ruin, and fails to hold creditors accountable for the high interest rates and predatory lending practices that force consumers into bankruptcy in the first place. What's more, they argue, the new code would make filing so complicated that it would require the help of an attorney, making bankruptcy unaffordable for those most in need of protection..."


Edwards also voted for the bill mentioned in the original post.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00354

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. The good news is that the 2005 list is way shorter than the 2001 list
We still have work to do, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Senate and House votes on this bill
House vote
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1999-570


Senate vote
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-354

or

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00354


Votes related to S. 900 <106th>
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes.xpd?bill=s106-900



http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+Democrats+Bow+to+the+Megabanks-a058726437

"...Few politicians bothered to consider the effect these megabanks will have ion the concentration of economic and political power in America. Senator Paul Wellstone, Democrat of Minnesota, was one of the exceptions. He warned his colleagues: "This is the wrong kind of modernization because it encourages the concentration of more and more economic power in the hands of fewer and fewer people. This concentration will wall off enormous areas of economic decision-making from any kind of democratic input or accountability.

It is too bad that the President and the Democratic leadership of both the House and Senate did not heed Senator Wellstone's words..."

from the PBS link in your article

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/wallstreet/weill/demise.html

"After 12 attempts in 25 years, Congress finally repeals Glass-Steagall, rewarding financial companies for more than 20 years and $300 million worth of lobbying efforts. Supporters hail the change as the long-overdue demise of a Depression-era relic...

...Just days after the administration (including the Treasury Department) agrees to support the repeal, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, the former co-chairman of a major Wall Street investment bank, Goldman Sachs, raises eyebrows by accepting a top job at Citigroup as Weill's chief lieutenant. The previous year, Weill had called Secretary Rubin to give him advance notice of the upcoming merger announcement. When Weill told Rubin he had some important news, the secretary reportedly quipped, "You're buying the government?"







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R....Lots of folks don't know what Glass-Steagall Act was about and why we should worry about it..
and what overturning it has done. Think about what the Media De-Regulation Bill of '96 has caused us with the Faux Media and you get an idea. Both done under "Big Business DLC Clinton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC