Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republicans are going to attack the Democrats as being weak on National Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 09:52 PM
Original message
The Republicans are going to attack the Democrats as being weak on National Security
Edited on Sun Dec-02-07 09:53 PM by Quixote1818
So, how do you neutralize their attacks?

You put this guy on the ticket:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. That guy
Was my guy in 2004. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And mine too!
His presence as VP on any ticket would trump anything the Reps could mention about security issues....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. My Dream Ticket would be Gore/Clark in 2008
If only my dream would come true. I would be sooooo happy:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Weak on Nat Security??? What? They been doing a great Job of it?? Hardly.
We can/should return the favor and portray them as weak on WISDOM....

Since when Dufussness is a desired trait?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nah... just tell them Condi Rice = National Security failure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. We should've nominated him in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
One of the reasons I was disappointed that he endorsed Clinton is that it likely limits his opportunities with other candidates, should they take the nomination.

But I respect him no less. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC