Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards: Populist Tech Crusader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:58 PM
Original message
John Edwards: Populist Tech Crusader
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 07:05 PM by JohnLocke
John Edwards: Populist Tech Crusader
Edwards links his technology agenda to his anti-establishment positions.
By Roy Mark--eWeek
Tuesday, November 13, 2007

----
Like most Democrats stumping for the White House, John Edwards can whistle up a tune for the technology crowd. Unlike his fellow competitors, Edwards' tune hits some discordant notes for Silicon Valley, broadband providers and their Wall Street financiers, and the true believers in an unregulated Internet.

The 54-year-old former U.S. senator and vice presidential candidate promises that an Edwards presidency will feature an ambitious proposal—fueled by public-private partnerships—to provide high-speed broadband access to all U.S. homes and businesses by 2010.

Edwards' yen for a change in direction, and deeper government involvement in broadband policies, extends to his broader technology platform.

He is calling for patent reform, increased H-1B visas, and pumped up federal spending on education, science, technology and innovation.

Those are the sweet notes for the Valley. But then there is free trade and all those embarrassing references to greedy, self-serving multinational companies, some of which have Bay area addresses.

In an Iowa campaign speech delivered in August, Edwards declared, "For years now, Washington has been passing trade deal after trade deal that works great for multinational corporations, but not for working Americans."

(...)

Edwards kept up the drumbeat throughout the fall and last week sharply criticized the U.S. House approval of a free trade agreement with Peru, the first free trade agreement vote since Democrats took control of the House and Senate in January.

But Edwards's voice is in greater harmony with fellow Democrats when it comes to technology issues, notably network neutrality.

(...)

"If you do not guarantee net neutrality, the Internet could go the way of network television and commercial radio—with just a few loud voices and no room for the grassroots and small entrepreneurs," Edwards wrote in a June letter to the Federal Communications Commission. "Small businesses and entrepreneurs cannot hope to outbid big companies for preferred status on the Web."

Edwards would also extend network neutrality to wireless networks, telling the FCC in May that all the winners of the beachfront spectrum for sale in January's FCC auction should be prohibited from discriminating among data and services. An Edwards' FCC would seek open wireless networks that allow any legal device to be attached to the service.

The FCC currently plans limited open access mandates for a third of the spectrum. The FCC also rejected Edwards' proposal that at least half of the spectrum be set aside for wholesalers.

Of broadband, President Bush famously said in 2004, "We ought to have a universal, affordable access for broadband technology by the year 2007, and then we ought to make sure as soon as possible thereafter, consumers have got plenty of choices when it comes to purchasing the broadband carrier."

Three years after those remarks were made, approximately 50 percent of Americans subscribe to a broadband service. Even using the FCC's widely discredited inflated data, large chunks of the United States are still without broadband access. For those who can access broadband, they get it at speeds that barely qualify as high speed by global standards.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2216265,00.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there ANYTHING John Edwards isn't? Jayeeeezus.
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 07:03 PM by mtnsnake
"Populist Tech Crusader".

WTF, is he a comic book hero now? Good gawd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Uhr.....No!
He's everything to everyone.......

He's underdog!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Here's a cover that might work, too (Snicker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Spoken by a true purple band aid wearer, no doubt.
I lurked on a certain candidate's blog in 04 and I saw how a group worked to destroy Dem candidates then. Those same people are still at it.

Pssst. I know the origin of "Breck-girl". It came from the Wes Clark blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. MSM cited it as Bush's nickname for Edwards
Bush had many nasty insulting nicknames for people which are media didn't see as the bulling that it was, but as charming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You're right:
"In 2003, as Greg Sargent notes, the New York Times anonymously quoted a "Bush associate" calling John Edwards "the Breck Girl of politics.” Now the Times' Adam Nagourney is expressing regret for helping the unnamed "associate" spread the slur. "Our story may have had the result of not only previewing what the Bush campaign intended to do, but, by introducing such memorably biting characterizations into the political dialogue, helping it," he writes."

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2007/04/24/publiceye/entry2722181.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. A blogger for a Dem candidate thought of it first?
Do you really believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Pssst...
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 09:15 PM by seasonedblue
how about something to back up that accusation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Are you feeling OK?
Not that I know WTF your talking about, and I don't really care, but I'm concerned that your paranoia is getting the best of you.

Not to worry, though, I'm sure the Populist Tech Crusader will come flying in to your rescue (Snicker).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What about your candidate? What does he/she stand for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Diplomacy and Impeachment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Then go start a thread praising your candidate. Scat! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. He already did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Then go tend to it. Good-bye. Exit. Leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Or I can just stay and pester you.
Or do you not comprehend the way a message board works? See, people post things, and others respond, often without the permission of you and your bad self.

:crazy:

Maybe you should tend to your shitty attitude? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Already have, here ya go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Ah so what?
I get tired of all the St. Kucinich stuff on DU, but it is better than reading all the Dem candidate X (usually Hillary) is a Republican threads. If Hillary had Kucinich's anti-choice roots, there would be 100 threads about it on DU. Kucinich and Hillary are my last choices in 08, FWIW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. What is an H-1B visa?
Bush ought to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Link to wiki definition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Calling for more in-sourcing (H-1B visas) is not populist... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No shit.
"Crusade" this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Sounds like it's to accelerate tech advances & keep them here.
Makes sense to me. Who cares if it fits into the narrow-minded "populist" box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. someone said on tv today that Edwards seems so happy being a populist.
that he did not seem comfortable being like he was in 04. that this populist thing seems to be so natural for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Someone's got to be the populist.
I think he's the one. In 2004 it was Dean. I didn't care for Edwards in 2004, but he's changed since then. He acknowledges that his vote on the IWR was a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. You might enjoy this article illi....from Oct 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. I don't get it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC