Reforming the Primary Process: Vote Early and Count Often
By Jonathan Soros, The New York Times. Posted November 10, 2007.
The focus on early primary states is bad for democracy -- we could establish a national primary by allowing early voting and making the results public in live time.
The system we use to select the major-party presidential nominees in this country is badly broken. That New Hampshire may move its primary into 2007 should be evidence enough. But focusing on the absurdity of the primary calendar obscures a problem of greater significance: not all voters are equal. To correct that sad truth we must change the way we select candidates.
The only solution that treats every voter equally would be to establish a true national primary, with every state voting on the same day. Unfortunately, this format would eliminate the essential "retail" politics of small-state primaries and turn the contest into a nasty televised slugfest among the candidates with the most money.
There is, however, a simple way to establish a national primary and yet still allow retail politicking to meaningfully affect the course of the campaign over several months: allow early voting, with regular reporting of the tally.
Here's one way it could work. Set a national primary date of June 30 and create a window for early voting that opens on Jan. 1. The early votes would be counted and reported at the end of each month from January through May.
More than 30 states already allow early voting, and every state allows absentee voting. But under the current system, those votes sit around until Election Day and often don't get counted at all if the race isn't close.
more...
http://alternet.org/story/67457/