|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:52 PM Original message |
3 times number of Democrats rule out vote for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. How's that netroots rhetoric working John? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. DLCers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. That has nothing to do with him "smearing" The Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
31. Exploiting his wife's cancer and son's death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liskddksil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:11 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Yep... it certainly is... for Edwards to do, which he did. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:48 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. I have a different take on this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 08:59 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. thank you nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Sorry to hear about your loss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tektonik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:21 AM Response to Reply #31 |
44. Exploiting his wife's cancer and son's death, whaaaa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
48. this is the worst post I've ever seen, ever. you're a stupid, cruel person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think Edwards would be in a stronger position now if he had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Which Is Why This Race Has Been Decided Already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Sorry but there's no need to blame Hillary for Edwards demise. Edwards made his own bed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. True...I don't think the secret gay dem mafia had anything to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
42. Problem is that he probably would not have won re-election to the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. What demise has come to Edwards, Seems to me it is Hillary's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. What a crock of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. Here Here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
35. who the hell would participate in USA Today poll? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Very much agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. You're right, it is the South after all...I think he realized he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Bad timing & not a safe seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Yeah, and we didn't know what a piece of work Holy Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. He was a hawkish socially conservative before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Very true...people didn't know that much about him prior... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'll vote for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AwareOne (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. How sad for Democrats, considering Edwards is the only viable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. It Will Certainly Be Close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. You know, they just might be uninformed enough to do so. Sad.Very sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. Poll shows 44% won't vote for Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
34. I REALLY Agree With You. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 08:46 AM Response to Reply #13 |
47. Edwards is "the only viable candidate against the Repubs"? lmao, he's the only unelectable candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. Boy, I guess we here at DU are totally out of touch with the rest of the Dems! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Edwards isn't losing supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D23MIURG23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
18. In other news polls routinely used by to manipulate electoral results by American media... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
20. The only significantly statisical poll I have seen was DFAs, with 150 people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. If that is so many old time Dems will no longer be Dems. Sad. Some would rather a corporate candidat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. I am an old time democrat, and get stsronger every election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #21 |
43. The only candidate who is truly a champion of the working "man" is Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The River (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. Edwards To Be Endorsed By Key Iowa Group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. delete. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. I think people saw Edwards for the phony he is a long time ago. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
29. "This message was brought to you by DLC HRC"...you forgot to add nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
36. "More than eight in 10 Republicans and more than half the married men in a new USA TODAY/Gallup Poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reno.Muse (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 03:32 AM Response to Original message |
37. USAToday? Now there's a credible paper! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
38. That would be very unlikely to happen come the time of the general election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
39. self-delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
40. And me to that list, making it three times plus one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
46. From same article: 84% of all voters won't vote for Clinton (Obama and Edwards only 60%) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Not what it says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
51. Is this the same poll that informs us that Republican males don't like Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC