|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:16 PM Original message |
Danger: 47% in California support dividing CA electoral votes. 34% oppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. K & R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh Puleeezzzeee. Stop with the be afraid shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Unfortunately, the ones not paying attention often still vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 02:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
35. And almost nowhere that I've been is this truer than in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. As a Californian, I support it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
racaulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I thought this thing was dead?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yes, but new backers put it out there again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Issa, in his role as the puggie party's bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I don't support it, even if all states do it. Here is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
34. Hey, let's support it as long as we split CA into three states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. 47% of what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. 47% of California registered voters (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Dude, Survey USA just predicted today's KY Gov. elections accurately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. according to the poll, they asked a generic question about the electoral college. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I'm hoping that's the reason why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. oh, that they will. How I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. This got totally pummelled when it was asked of CA voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. well, not exactly. they ditched it because a lawsuit for fraud was brought up against the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. na na na na. no. the survey was of 1700 people, and they were asked a generic question about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. That's a good point. Another recent poll showed opposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. we are democrats. as soon as it becomes a real question to vote on, all democrats will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. don't know. haven't seen any polls on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. Want to stop this?" go here>>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. If you don't like it, then abolish the Electoral College! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I understand rooting for the popular vote. But this crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. This is a republican scheme to take away 20 votes from california. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #18 |
32. Winner-take-all is undemocratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. They will cut their own throats. Ignorant. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
26. people in California including Democrats are stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 02:46 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. Us stupid people rejected all 5 of Arnold's initiatives back in 2005 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andromeda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 03:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Yeeeeeeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 04:24 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. but i'm still angry at the so called Dems who supported recall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. If I were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. EXACTLY!!! This has NO SUPPORT IN CA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thatsrightimirish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
30. eh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
33. Is this on the ballot yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
36. Not enough, experts say passing an initiative requires 70%+ support out of the gate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
38. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
41. This effort is unconstitutional... only the Legislature has the power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sss1977 (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
42. The electoral college system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC