Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow just said much of the criticism of Hillary is sexist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:26 PM
Original message
Rachel Maddow just said much of the criticism of Hillary is sexist
On Dan Abrams' show.

Oh, and there was a Republican mouthpiece on who said no, it's not been sexist at all.

As usual, Rachel Maddow is right on target.

I'm glad I agree with her and not the Republican shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rachel Maddow happens to be full of shit on this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Amen! Even Clinton said it wasn''t sexist, after she insinuated it was.
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Delete
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 09:37 PM by ruggerson
sorry, misread it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I wouldn't know; I don't watch or listen to Coulter. Coulter who? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:32 PM
Original message
So now you're using a Republican meme that trashed Kerry
to trash Sen. Clinton?

Great going there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. No, actually I got it from The Nation, but nice try:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=248003

After her poor performance in Tuesday's debate, Clinton's camp accused Obama and John Edwards of engaging in the "politics of pile-on."

What that didn't stick either, they concocted a new rationale: her opponents were sexist pigs! Clinton advisors told the AP there is a "a clear and long-planned strategy to fend off attacks by accusing her male rivals of gathering against her."

Obviously Hillary has endured a lot of unfair criticism in her day, much of which was sexist, especially coming from the right-wing. But her opponents in Tuesday's debate were criticizing her largely about policy issues--Iran, Social Security, immigration--and her ability to fight for change and bring the country together. Any frontrunner should expect such treatment--man or woman, black or white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I agree with the Nation
but not with your word construct which mimics "Kerry was for the war before he was against it."

Maddow was not specifically referring to the debate, but to the general coverage/criticism of Clinton by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. When was the last time a male presidential candidate
was criticized for exposing his cleavage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I dunno, when was the last time a male candidate was poked fun at for being bald?
And Bill Richardson's double chin wants to have a word with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Same argument could be made
for * exposing his cod piece in the Mission Accomplished photo op.
That got lots of (ahem) coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. Even though he probably didn't have much cod to cover under there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I'm sorry, but last I checked
SHE IS 60 YEARS OLD, not a teenage stripper.

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. ...or being ambitious or aggressive? Obama said she's determined to win. Boo hoo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I loves me some Maddow
but she is way off base on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. I didn't see it, but I respect her ability
to analyze politics. I will have to catch the replay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. here's a link to the video
http://tinyurl.com/2flmdg

see lower right hand corner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. She was talking about the media
not the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thats aspect is really undeniable
But it's just her campaign's tendency to lump ALL criticism of her into this convenient categorization. I have a problem with that.

Imagine if Obama said all criticism of him was based in racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That I agree with
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. And much of it may be.
Just not mine. I am not in favor of her corporatism.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maddow is probably right
since 'much' of the criticism is coming from Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. And the anti-Clintonites here on DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. you think Rachel reads DU?
Hello Ms. Maddow :hi:

Is there any misogyny here?

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. I definitely think there is some sexism involved in the criticism
For example, John Edwards commenting during one of the debates that he didn't like the outfit she had on.

All the talk about her so-called "cackle."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. those were two of the examples Maddow referred to
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. That is beyond weak
The coat joke was just for laughs. It was in response to a lame "what do you admire about the person next to you and what do you dislike" question. Edwards said something nice and then he said, "I'm not sure about that coat." Hillary actually thought it was funny at the time. She CACKLED!

And, as for CackleGate, all that criticism did her a favor. Notice how she doesn't laugh anymore at inappropriate moments? In fact, now she doesn't laugh at all. I mean, the laugh is GONE! Personally, I miss it; when it's spontaneous, it's one hell of an appealing laugh, a little on the goofy side, but full-bodied and reflective of someone with a sense of humor who likes to laugh. Problem on that particular Sunday was she laughed every time she was asked a question she didn't quite like or heard a comment that she thought was bullshit, and much of it looked and sounded forced. It added up to about five or six belly laughs in response to not-so-funny remarks, which made her look hopelessly contrived. Even many of her supporters were cringing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I think the "cackle" is as stupid and offensive as the Repub
"effeminate" meme about Edwards.

All this shit needs to be called out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yep!! Look at all the times they've said "you just hate Bush!"
GWB and his people have done more damn whining and nobody ever says, "it's because he's a man!"

He's NEVER made to take responsibility for anything, NEVER!!! He say shit like he doesn't care about or think about OBL and everyone's all "oh you know what he meant."

But they're CONSTANTLY saying everyones being mean and piling on to Bush with the TOTALLY WELL DESERVED criticisms, and nobody ever says "HE'S PLAYING THE MAN CARD!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. I thought she said some of the MEDIA treatment was sexist
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 09:42 PM by spooky3
and gave some of the examples people have seen here. And there is plenty of other evidence on Mediamatters.org. If I am recalling correctly, Maddow did NOT say that the other candidates' criticism of Clinton was sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. does the OP
say the "other candidate's?" I'm referring to the media. I'll change the title if you think it's too vague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Given the replies to your OP, don't you think people are
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 09:52 PM by spooky3
interpreting it as someone other than the media?

They seem to be saying

--that's not the basis of THEIR criticism
--that's not the basis of VOTERS' criticism
--the other candidates didn't pile on, etc.

Your OP referred to "much of the criticism" and didn't label it as media criticism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. No, I think they've got blinders on
the "cackling" issue and the concern with how she dresses and appears, amongst many other examples, have been curtly dismissed as not being sexist in many recent, myriad threads on this. Those had nothing to do with other candidate's criticisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I think when you say "much of the criticism"
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 10:02 PM by spooky3
that's misstating what Maddow said, but I could be wrong about that.

I completely agree with you and with her about sexism in the media coverage and that there is likely sexism in other places as well - and I'll leave it there. My quibble is just with stating what Maddow said accurately. And it's leading some fans of hers possibly to misunderstand what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I watched the entire interview
and characterized it correctly. And Maddow is no great Hillary fan. Although here, for expressing those sentiments, she would have vitriolic trolls calling her a "hillbot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Here's a link to the page containing the video:
http://tinyurl.com/2flmdg

see lower right hand corner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh, how they twist and turn and call it something else. Anything else.
Especially here on DU. The worst thing about liberals is our refusal to believe bigotry exists in us. It does. Much, perhaps most, of the irrational, visceral, demented hatred of Hillary Clinton is sexism. And the worst spewers here are women. Sad, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. It's depressing, actually
and the visceral hatred with which they deny the sexism is enough to make you want to puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
49. They never notice that it's a wee bit disproportionate .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momto3 Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. I have to disagree.
I think many voters have legitimate complaints about Hillary's stances. That being said, I think more sexist comments actually come from the repug side when it comes to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. As you well know, ruggerson, "all the gays are for Clinton"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I know
it's all a politically correct conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Interesting. Calling us sexists or republicans in a backhanded way.
Sorry, but Maddow is the one who made a sexist statement. I'll die a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Who's "us"
people who loathe Hillary Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. You didn't use the word loathe, you said criticize.
I criticize candidates that talk around issues, especially in these times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. There's plenty to criticize her for
talking her way around various issues not being the least of it.

But, much of the criticism has been virulently personal and sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. By whom?
Republicans I can see as it being those things but which democratic candidates do you see in that category?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Most of *our* criticism of Hillary is peace-activ-ist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. If that's what *yours* is (singular)
then it's legitimate. One can have a credible debate when the premise is grounded in a real policy critique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. i don't like bigotry
whether it's coming from a republican or from someone who, blindly, can only detect and protest it when it's directed at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Keep on spewin'
coming from someone who professes to fight against prejudice, it's fascinating that your hatred of this particular woman leads you to mischaracterize people and defend the indefensible. Try to think about what and whom you're really angry with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
50. No, that's not what she said. She did agree that it was bad that Hilbots were using the gender card
such as Geraldine Ferraro and Eleanor Smeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
52. Actually, much of my criticism of Hillary has to do with Bill Clinton
and the mistakes made during his administration. So, I think Rachel Maddow is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
57. She was directing that comment at the media
not the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. Listen to Rachel every day. LOVE her. But she is wrong.
And I am a female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
59. Sadly, she's right. For the record, MY criticism of Clinton isn't sexist.
But most of the noise coming from the right is rooted in the offense of a woman president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC