Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's 'Me Too' Problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:46 PM
Original message
Hillary's 'Me Too' Problem
Hillary Clinton has a Me-Too problem, and it was illustrated perfectly at last night's Democratic presidential debate in Philadelphia.

Here's the problem. Clinton allows Barack Obama and John Edwards (and sometimes even Bill Richardson and Chris Dodd) to dictate the policy proposals of the Democratic field. By and large, she puts forward relatively moderate ideas that rely heavily on conventional thinking—until one or more of her competitors takes a more bold, populist stand. Then Clinton immediately embraces the new stand, and the competitor or competitors have nothing on which to run against her.

I wrote a comment on David's post on this yesterday, regarding opposition to Michael Mukasey's nomination to be attorney general. Clinton announced she opposed the nomination, though she was following Edwards, who was following Obama, who was following Dodd. "So is this how a candidate maintains frontrunner status?" I wrote. "Make sure there is not an inch of difference between her and any other candidate? In a word, mimicry?"

That doesn't strike me as true leadership. And yesterday's debate had a moment that illustrated this perfectly. Clinton was asked by Tim Russert if she supported New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's proposal to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. According to Russert, Clinton had told a group of newspaper editors that the idea made sense. Clinton responded approvingly, saying, "What Governor Spitzer is trying to do is fill the vacuum left by the failure of this administration to bring about comprehensive immigration reform." Illegal immigrants are on the roads and will get into accidents. It's a reality, she said, and we ought to have a system to handle it.

But then Chris Dodd criticized the idea, saying that a driver's license is a privilege and not a right. Clinton instantly said, "I just want to add, I did not say that it should be done." Dodd pounced: "Wait a minute. No, no, no. You said yes, you thought it made sense to do it." Clinton responded by trying to explain that Spitzer's plan included three different kind of licenses. She promptly got lost in the weeds and accused the assembled of playing "gotcha." With that, it was off to the races.

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2007/10/5998_debate_reaction.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. She plays it safe. Being a leader means possibly stumbling, possibly
alienating some constituencies, not always being able to poll and focus-group first. It's risky. I would hope that if/when she's elected, she will act more like a Dem leader and less like a permanent candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. What do you mean, "problem"? This is shutting off any avenue for disagreement.
From the left, anyway. It's absorbing opposing arguments rather than confronting them. Yes, it **IS** how frontrunners maintain their status, as candidates, and as parties. It works when you can make it appear like you are in the dominant position, as Republicans spend a great deal of effort doing. Hillary is making the other candidates look like Hillary-lite - why go for Hillary-lite when you can get the real thing?

And what political defense is there against this? That Hillary is a bad person?

If people are satisfied with Hillary - and the polls say they are - this is not a "problem" - it is a strategy for victory, and it will succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The polls reflect the percentage of coverage given to the...
candidates. Look back say 8 months ago and look at the percentage of advertisement that each of the candidates have received, it matches up to the polls. Take two similar products ( democratic candidates ) and give one a large percentage of advertisement and the others smaller amounts or none and watch the sales of each product. Its pretty simple to realize thats what is happening in the polls but maybe the people who support the candidate in the lead of these polls doesn't want to face reality and want to believe their candidate is best only because of this advertisement? I work in the restaurant business and you could put a picture of a pile of shit all dressed up with garnish and it would sell, its pretty amazing how you can determine what people choose by some simple advertising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The problem with it is that it is all superficial - if she wins, we lose
because we didn't nominate someone to lead the party or the nation, but someone who by habit and inclination will go along to get along.

A loser.

Someone who will get her butt kicked in the general, because when she's out there on her own with no one to steal from but Mike Huckabee, we are fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Bush did this to McCain in 2000
All of a sudden Bush supported campaign finance reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. But when it comes to the neocon agenda, Hillary leads the charge
right behind Joe Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. to guard against that
accusation She picks the absolutely Wrong side of the issue of drivers licenses to illegals. either she is differentiating herself from the neo-con charge or pandering to the Hispanic vote. either way it is a national security issue and fully 80%+ are against it. regardless of party affiliation. the Independents decide elections. they will decide against her on this one. She cannot back up the truck either. She will loose the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Doesn't seem to be a problem so far.
assuming there is any truth to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. How can you be in two places at once when you're not anywhere at all?
The Firesign Theatre knew the type...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. So now Democrats are against immigration?
I was suprised to hear Obama and Edwards spouting off the anti-immigrant Republican talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Obama said he supported it.
So what are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Mimicry is what Hillary AND her supporters are doing.
Just read around DU. The common theme from Clinton people is that there is no difference between Hillary and Obama.

Hillary is obviously trying to run on soft characteristics rather than issues. "You already like me and there is no difference between me and ObamaEdwardsDoddBidenETC so vote for me."

I find it disturbing and disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. She comes across as slippery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC