Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HRC should demand the full release of her 'hidden' papers IMMEDIATELY .....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:29 PM
Original message
HRC should demand the full release of her 'hidden' papers IMMEDIATELY .....
.... after Bush releases his old man's.

Interesting how the DEMOCRAT has to accede to the demands of the 'media' while the crime family can just keep on keepin' on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Send that to Tweety
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. What the hell does Bush have to do with the Clintons?
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 07:32 PM by jmp
...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't believe you are defending her this way. You really want to sink to their level?
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 07:33 PM by calteacherguy
Un-****ing believeable.

Edit: GoBama! My blinders are OFF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. What is that? The 6 or 7th time you switched candidates
Your act got old when you dumped Edwards for Obama for Clinton joining in whatever outrage du jour was happening on DU against whatever candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. So it;s Obama this week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry but I expect more from Democrats then I do from Bush, we are the party that
embraces transparency, leave the secrets to the fascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, man, ain't THAT the truth ...
I admit I didn't see the entire debate (we don't get MSNBC here) - just video clips that have been posted.

But when I heard Mr. PotatoHead bring up the topic of 'secret papers', I put myself in Hill's mind and thought what she probably REALLY wanted to respond: "Hey, Timmah, where does that 'show us the papers' attitude go when you've got someone from this administration on your show? Let's start with those 600-plus Abramoff papers, shall we?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wish some of those assholes yelling for her to release her papers
would go to the archives and read the law. AND THE LAW WHERE PAPERS OF PRESIDENT ETC CANT' BE RELEASED UNTIL SO MANY YEARS AFTER THEIR TERM...Iam going to go find the law and post it here...every other message. It seems the Hillary flamers are out in force the last two months, since Obama has bombed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You do that. You will find Bill REQUESTED they be sealed for 12 years.
12 years, hmmm....how CONVENIENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. they are HIS papers to deal with. she has no legal say nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I'm not sure I want more drama ...
... in the White House. If Bill won't release the documents to help his wife's campaign, then there is more trouble there than they are letting on.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Who did Obama bomb? LOL! Why I believe it was HRC last night....!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. You're talking about the President, right? Hillary wasn't the President.
But, she sure thinks she was!

LoL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. She isn't POTUS yet. I think we should spend more time demanding Rove's eMails. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Way to aim high!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're more upset with Clinton than bush*'s daddy
They will go right along with the media and it's repuke masters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Absolutely
That's what hate does to (presumably) formerly rational people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. When Barbara Bush runs for president partly on the basis of her experience as first lady
then that might be an appropriate analogy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. It would be unwise to release any papers...
connected to the lewinsky affair before a crucial election.

We're in uncharted territory being that HC was a former first lady. The Clintons were fighting the right wing smear machine. Embarassing statements may come to light when they were beseiged by the neocons. Hope the Democrats don't shoot themselves in the foot with this.



For the record: I'll vote (D) whomever that may be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary is the candidate with experience ...
But she can't show you her resume. It's top secret. Word is that she was working under cover for the CIA. Releasing her papers would put people's lives in danger. ;)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. What you write has the ring of truth...
Why are some Democrats jumping on her for this? It boggles the mind.

kick and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Willful ignorance or blind hate
Those two conditions explain a lot.

Outrage overload is another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. When I was in a training course for work, they said to never...
refer to something that someone else is doing when you talk of your own work or when you are trying to show someone your own qualities. It only shows your own weakness when you have to point attention to someone else instead of standing proud on your own achievements. She should stand proud on her past experience and demand to show the country so we can see that she is the experienced candidate that she has been telling us she is. That way there are no haters and we can all vote on the facts instead of just what someone says. Like with the Bilderberg group, evil is done in the dark, the good is done in the light for all to see, is she hiding something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Oh please ..... the OP was hyperbole to point out the inherent unfairness in the media
You took it literally. I'm sorry you did. The point of the remains valid ..... there's one standard for the Clintons and one standard for the Crime Family. The Clenis has been gone for six years and they still burn an effigy of its head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC