Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are some Hillary supporters portraying her as a victim?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:23 AM
Original message
Why are some Hillary supporters portraying her as a victim?
Does anyone really believe that America wants a President with a victim complex?

Doesn't all this "men ganging up on a woman" crap just set back the womens movement?

Would any self respecting progressive ever demand that the bar be lowered based on gender? Or is this just a DLC thing?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a defend Hillary at all costs thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insanad Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. Glaring Mistakes
I said MAYBE, and that's my final answer!!!

I think I have a good picture of what Bill Clinton faces daily when he's being a typical naughty boy. Hilary's face was absolutely reflective of her bristling anger and resentful bitterness as she glared at Obama with daggers that would pierce through a steel and concrete bomb shelter. Imagine if she wins the nomination and then faces the onslaught of the Republicans and other people who don't want her there. We'll have that face, that edgy bitch tone, that harsh rebuke and glaring resentment facing us every day on the news. It's hard enough to have the shit flinging chimpanzee of George Bush gesticulating and goofing daily but at least he's easy to dismiss as the buffoon he is. Having Hilary nag and rant and chide would make me cancel my cable.

When I watch these debates I'm in awe of the stamina and grace that any of these candidates must muster. The questions can set one up for a disaster and a cool head, thoughtful but quick and focused answer must be given. Every nuance of a facial gesture or tick is noted and analyzed for signs of honesty or emotional reaction. Then there's the time limits that force the one answering to give in essence, a committed yes or no, even if there's qualifiers.

From a debate standpoint, from a perspective of who can take charge even when they're not in charge, from a measure of one's grace and quick decisiveness, a sense of humor, an ability to stay on message and turn trick questions in their favor BARACK ROCKS!!!! I loved his response to the UFO thing, his response to the Social Security mess, his Halloween response, and the absolute dignified and intelligent demeanor he exudes when he's on stage. God I hope he can win. Not because I'm caught up in his electrifying charisma, but because his ideas, his leadership, his ability to reflect strength and diplomatic reason are all the kinds of things our nation needs to help us heal from the years of George Bush and his disastrous presidency. If anyone can take this bag of broken glass that is our nations economy, military, and reputation and make a virtual stained glass window to illuminate the goodness that is inherent in America, then I believe Barack Obama can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. STOP SPAMMING with your bs cut and paste rant
this is the third time I'm reading that, word for word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Got a link to back up your assertion?
No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's all over DU.
Try reading a thread or two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No link? I thought so. Yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. OP is full of shit
Someone pointed out that other people might feel that way, so now JMP is trying to make it out as if there is some campaign to make her a victim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. here's your link: www.democraticunderground.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are you talking about me?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3667207&mesg_id=3667207

I'm not a Hillary supporter. I simply posed a question about public response to an image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Among others.
And it's not the first time. Every time Hillary gets her nose bloodied, out come her supporters playing the damsel in distress card.

I'm sick of it. You can't be a victim and President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. And you can have a thought in your head about Hillary
Without being a Hillary supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. exactly.

you made a thoughtful observation, and people's heads
exploded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Rabid animal reactions
Say the word Hillary, and the attack begins. In a thread about Obama going after Hillary about the arcives issue, one poster starts talking about her positions on war, as if that has anything to do with the thread

They hear her name, and they reflexively dump their Id on a thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. A team that has to battle the opponent AND the referees, but still wins, is no victim.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. True. However, Hillary lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. She may have lost the battle but she'll most certainly win the war. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Better put on your flame retardant suit.....
and some rubber boots for the b/s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Seems civil so far
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:34 AM by Moochy
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. The better approach would be to spin it--Hilary is tough enough
to take on all the guys and still remain standing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. why are some anti-hillaryites misrepresenting the point?

I have seen two people point out that the electorate may
not respond very positively to seeing men attacking female
candidates. no one is getting their panties in a wad over it,
other than you.

in fact, I went out of my way to point out that politics is
a rough business, and she is fair game.

it's shit like this that makes it impossible to have a rational
discussion about anything worth talking about around here. someone
wanders by and poisons an otherwise civil conversation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Who said anything about men ganging up on a woman, other than you? nt
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:29 AM by mtnsnake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why do you hate women? Why do you want Rudy Giuliani to be president?
You're really a Republican, aren't you? Or maybe a Green. Yeah, that's it, a Green.



Just thought I'd get all the pro-Hillary responses out of the way so we could have a real discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. What a redolent platter of pasture pastry.
Ignore the sexism because that's "lowering the bar"??? Or ignore it because progressives can never face their own bigotry?

Is there no slander that won't be heaped upon this woman for her audacious courage, to punish her for so much ambition?

Have a nice meadow muffin before crawling back under that rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Sexism to ask a woman tough questions???
Sexism to demand a straight answer from a Presidential candidate?

Give me a break!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Tough questions -or- gotcha questions? You seem to be somewhat confused.
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:51 AM by Maribelle
Asking someone their opinion on issues is a great distance from your pomp "to demand a straight answer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Every question is a gotcha question ...
When your answer varies depending on your audience and which way the wind happens to be blowing at any point in time.

Not only is it acceptable to try to pin a candidate down ... the press would be negligent if it didn't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Sadly,the main attempt to pin Hillary down focused on the actions of a governor. Meaningless crap.
In essence, it really doesn't matter one way or the other what Hillary's opinion is of this when the blame is squarely on the shrugging shoulders of the corrupt Bush administration, and the governor is merely attempting to keep his head above water.

Hillary's answers do not vary from her stand on the issues that matter most to her campaign.

A debate is not supposed to be about pinning a candidate down. A debate is supposed to be about points and counter points over important issues. A debate is supposed to be about facts that support your points.

"The press" fails in moderating the debates - - I would hope to see future debates not run by the Bush sock puppets. I would hope to see real debates.

To no thanks to Russert and Williams last night, not even one tiny iota, we heard about the enormous threat of Pakistani. This would be the classic example of what debates should be about, now wouldn't it?

I want to hear this type of information. Not the plethora of petty crap that happened the rest of the evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. And right on cue...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. No, no sexism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. CNN Radio News referred to the Philly Debate as...
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:38 AM by zulchzulu
...that other Democrats "picked on the former First Lady last night..."

I'll try to grab the audio; it was on the 9AM newsbreak on the local AAR station here.

Picking on her? :shrug: What is this? A pajama party?

The meme is that the big sweaty men are picking on poor Lil' Hill...


Debate frame: Everyone picking on Hillary?
The latest Democratic debate is tonight at 9 pm in Philadelphia on NBC. Obama and Edwards have indicated that they plan to try to sharpen differences with Clinton on Social Security, Iraq, Iran, taking money from lobbyists etc., and the Clinton campaign is doing its best to frame this as "desperate attacking guys go negative."

Here's a Mark Penn memo, and here's an advance that frames the debate just like Clinton wants: "Clinton Gets Ready To Be Rumbled." Even Bill Richardson seems to be acting as a surrogate (or vice-presidential wannabe?), saying in an interview today, "I think that Senators Obama and Edwards should concentrate on the issues and not on attacking Senator Clinton."

This, as many have noted, is an old Clinton trick. For a woman who is not running as a woman, she and her surrogates have played the victim awfully well when attacked in her Senate races by men, and it's a natural card for any frontrunner to play. On top of that, there's a history of negative attacks backfiring in Iowa -- where the race is still tight.

That being said, there's no campaign if you can't criticize your opponent, is there? Maybe Clinton is warning them not to do it because she's worried that they will.

http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2007/10/debate_frame_everyone_picking.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. Kuch's UFO sighting is getting more press and air time....nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. Why are some Obama supporters portraying him as a saint
If you looked at his voting record you see it was tarnished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PollM Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. Democratic Debate in Philadelphia
"I think that our responsibility as presidential candidates is to be in 'tell the truth' mode all the time," Edwards said.

Which candidate do you believe was the least honest & least forthcoming during the Debate?
---> http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=846

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. I truly believe Hillary is proud of how the men are ganging up on her. No victim there.
It seems to me the more the "men ganging up on a woman" syndrome is perpetuated, the higher her numbers soar.

And our Hillary is soaring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. I'm not even sure I understand your response.
...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Of course you don't.
Try replying when you have a clue about how woman have suffered through adversities to become like the Phoenix rising from the ashes.

Women are proud they are now more beautiful than before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. "when you have a clue about how woman have suffered"
OK, now I understand what you meant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. You missed the "to become" part. I knew you would.
My great grandmothers paved the way for women today. Please try to keep up. The Phoenix is rising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. Mud slinging politics is nothing new,
Its effects are well known. Both the attackee and the attacker get tarnished to varying degrees. Can you point to any where that Hillary played the victim card? Or is that just your fantasy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Fantasy combined with deceit
near the top, WesDem links to the post that so mortified jmp. You can see it for yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
33. I thought Biden won,
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:54 AM by seasonedblue
and I don't think this was Clinton's best debate, but there was an anti-Hillary bias IMO. Russert framed his questions as a set up, "John Edwards, you said blah, blah, blah, about Senator Clinton" and then sat back and let Edwards take it from there. He did the same thing with Obama and Dodd. When the moderation's so off-balanced, the fight isn't fair.

That said, this was Edwards' best debate and he took the most swings at Clinton, Obama rallied very well at the end, Richardson bored me, which he's done in every single debate, and Kucinich seemed subdued. Dodd had an excellent performance, he just didn't get enough time.

But Biden won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
38. More on the Poor Me Meme
This is getting funny...
Hillary Rodham Clinton's rivals ganged up on her during a two-hour Democratic presidential debate Tuesday night, putting the front-runner on defense on issues ranging from Iraq and Iran to Social Security and whether she would be electable in the general election.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071031/D8SK33080.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I think the MSM looks for something to bait people with
Sometimes it's the victim thing. Sometimes it's that she is too man-like.

Frankly, I think the victim thing works in Hillary's favor.

When viewers perceive that Hillary is under attack, then they admire her strength.

However, when she is not being attacked, her strength can be a real disadvantage. She can be portrayed as a ball-breaker. It is much harder for Hillary to defend against that line of attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
42. Good question
I was going to ask the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
45. Don't pretty much all supporters paint their chosen candidate as a victim
Don't pretty much all supporters paint their chosen candidate as a victim when something doesn't go their way?

From where I sit, the martyr complex is a pretty useful rhetorical tool on DU. I don't think any one candidate (or their supporters) has a monopoly on it.



But I'm sure that in the case of (insert most vilified candidate of your choice here), it's actually true, and in the case of (insert candidate you support here), it's a vicious operation put out by CoinIntelPro and the RNC. Because why would anyone want (insert most vilified candidate of your choice here) as President, when we all know ONLY (insert candidate you support here) has the support, the answers and the drive to lead this country back to it's former (insert righteous adjective here).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC