Hillary wants war with Iran as long as it is "slow"....

[ddeclue]

She can't say straightforward that she is opposed to war with Iran without allowing herself an "out" by qualifying her answer...

She is opposed to the RUSH but not opposed to the war.

More Hillary double-speak...

Doug D.

[FlaxieB]

1. So true. She will continue the war in Iraq and continues Bush's effort to attack Iran.

[aquart]

3. Proof? Oh, right. That's your opinion. Based on.......?

[aquart]

2. Yeah, that's the Clintons. Starting wars everywhere.

Except for the bit about being so famous for getting negotiations going in the most difficult places.

The frontrunner who promises peace no matter what walks into every negotiation with hands tied.

Clinton is refusing to tie her hands. Reading a declaration of war into that is being deliberately obtuse because of a prejudice which is....based on what, exactly? All the Clinton wars?

[ddeclue]

5. Based on ENGLISH COMPREHENSION!

I can diagram a sentence and determine the ACTUAL subject verb and OBJECT of her sentence.

Perhaps you can't...

The OBJECT in her sentence was "RUSH" not "WAR". So she is opposed to the RUSH not the war.

I am pointing out her endless weasel wording and it is exactly why I don't trust her!

Doug D.

[superkia]

4. Im glad someone else noticed how many times she said that...

she didn't support a RUSH to war with Iran. I don't think the Clinton supporters brains are able to process her saying that but wasn't sure how many others noticed. Never said she was against going to war with Iran, just against a rush? Don't worry Clinton supporters will come out of the wood work and say that it meant nothing, I swear you could have video of her killing people and some of her supporters would somehow not see it? Its strange.