|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:41 AM Original message |
Edwards: "we're going to have to take on a system that's rigged and corrupt and doesn't work" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteelPenguin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. Edwards is winning me over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
2. Edwards is gonna be the big surprise in the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Edwards is truly the only one promoting a change from the norm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thats a mighty bold statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I guess I missed the point of your link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Yes, and we so need that change. Hillary is more of the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 06:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. I still have trouble understanding this anti-lobbyist thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 07:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Could you name these lobbyists and their affiliations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 08:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Here's a couple, but I don't think we should get too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Thanks for the names. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. But it strikes me as a sign of weakness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaksavage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
4. Hope he has great security. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I take it you mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. I'm going with Edwards all the way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. I think we've got us a "Let's Roll" moment.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. Edwards 2008!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. To do this, Edwards must revoke Corporate personhood. It's the only way to get rid of the corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. Nice to see him stumping for the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. "... because I'm not winning!" /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
17. For his sake, I hope they stage this speech better than the last NH one on C-Span |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. You do, really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 07:25 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yup. As much as I wanted Obama and Clinton to ditch McClurkin and Berger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
23. Is he talking about the legal system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC