|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:36 AM Original message |
Poll question: Would you support a Democratic candidate who has the following anti-choice record? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
1. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. *Drumroll!* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Wow! Thanks! What a shock. My vote shifts to corporate Shillary instead! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. So you're not going to respond with regards to the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
3. Apparently Kucinich has got Hillary a little frightened, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:45 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Nope, I'm just pointing out the DINO's running in the race. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. DINO??!!!! BWAHAHAHA!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Would you, or would you not support a Democratic candidate running with that record? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:55 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. You mean instead of the Goldwater Girl?? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:56 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I didnt see a "yes" or a "no" in that response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:08 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Yes! Are you satisfied? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Wow. Very, very sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 07:25 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. You need to take your meds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. You support a candidate who does, therefore, you support it. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 06:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
54. Your candidate voted for a war, so I guess you support the effort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
71. Sarcastic irony sure isn't lost on you, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
56. "You support a candidate who does, therefore, you support it. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:16 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. However, to be fair, that's not the platform he's running on now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Very true, just as Mrs.Clinton isn't running on a pro-Iraq platform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 06:10 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. The Difference Is Ms. Clinton Was A Goldwater Girl Up Until 1964 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
57. ah, you've graduated from the wyldwolf school of "debate tactics" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:14 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Do you know what they call Goldwater Republicans now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Bite your tongue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #17 |
65. No, they call them "New Democrats" or "Blue Dog Democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 03:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
60. The only thing scaring me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
4. Dennis' Catholic upbringing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I was brought up a strong catholic myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
31. That may be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. And Dennis didn't. So??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. So your premise that Dennis is immune from criticism because he was "raised a catholic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. It was an explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. It's not an "attack" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. No, no, no. Less than 100% is one thing. This voting record is shocking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
13. Yes, I knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
15. I already know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. I don't the "pandering" argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
49. 3 MONTHS before announcing he's running? Are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kiouni (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
20. Uhh.... I support a few of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgorth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. I can't believe someone just called DK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. AMEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Anybody who opposes: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. The past tense of "oppose" is "opposed" not "opposes." I just sent Dennis $50 in your honor. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. You're welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 07:36 AM Response to Reply #32 |
63. Yeah, just like anyone . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yes, I would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Last session of congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. nevermind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. Why attack Kucinich? Because his name's still on Michigan ballot, despite his effort to withdraw? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Beating Dennis up because he's on the MI ballot over positions he's long since evolved past is LOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Is Dennis immune from criticism? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Hillary is a Republican !* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. The difference: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
55. Oh, please. 47 years as opposed to 3 years? You've got to be kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hit them where it counts Lirwin2! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Haha thanks. DK supprters love to dish it out, but as this thread proves, they can't take criticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. It's amazing the only one that is supposed to be criticized is Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. You guys couldn't hit us where it counts with laser sights installed on your head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
47. I notice you didn't post dates, didn't post any votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. His NARAL rating of 100% comes AFTER his announcement of running for president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Actually, his change of position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
51. ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
58. Nice utter pwnage of Kucinich, Lirwin2! n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sandaasu (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
59. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 07:35 AM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 08:00 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. DOMA is a double-headed monster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 08:34 AM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Kucinich also supported DOMA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Oops! nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
61. What's The Brouhaha About? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
66. Won't work. Nice try though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. What won't work? I'm dying to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
68. Kucinich is one of my last picks for 08, but not because of his firm anti-choice past. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
72. Many people have truly evolved on this issue when they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
73. Citations for your claims, please ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC