Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Electability" is a bonus prize for the front-runner, and no-one else

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:55 PM
Original message
"Electability" is a bonus prize for the front-runner, and no-one else
I posted this elsewhere, but I thought in light of the electability UFO flying about that I'd like to hear what other people make of this. So, is "electability" a quality that any candidate can, in principle, aspire to / pursue, or is it a "bonus" that only benefits the front-runner, no matter the name? I think it's the latter.


I posit that:

  1. The American electorate is largely politically disenfranchised, disinterested and dis-informed;
  2. Media are not really informing, nor framing news objectively (as in: "fair and accurate") but instead strive to provide "entertaining content" to serve and protect their advertisement revenues;
  3. The scourge of "pundits" is a preposterous case in point for media offering off-the-wall opinion for mainstream entertainment and elitist controversy;
  4. It took 3 years to get to the point that people now begin to understand that there's a problem with Bush in the White House - expecting them to be knowledgeable on "candidate issues" is just six bridges too far;
  5. The generic sense of embarrassment over Bush, the overwhelming rah-rah response (IMO a likely after-wave of the mood after 9/11) to generally backing the war against Iraq, and the resulting bouts of denial, further propel the tendency to opt for "electability" as main motivator to back whomever is generally perceived to be the front-runner;
  6. The more "issue oriented" a candidate is, the more his/her supporters will tend to become a hard-core following, which in turn tends to tick of people who consider themselves as "mainstream voters";
  7. For a strange reason, "intelligent" is a voter-repellent trait of candidates; there's a tendency to "mistrust" candidates that are generally portrayed / perceived as "very intelligent";
  8. Name recognition is all.


Add all up, and you end up with a very broad and shallow support for Kerry (hence the importance of "electability" among his supporters) and a more narrow and deep support for others.

Thank gawd for Jerry Springer, Larry King and casual sex (ha, I got your attention!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. *twoink*
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC