Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SO...POTENTIAL recess appointment A.G. Skeletor "personally assures" Hillary investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:34 PM
Original message
SO...POTENTIAL recess appointment A.G. Skeletor "personally assures" Hillary investigation
Edited on Wed Sep-05-07 11:34 PM by Amerigo Vespucci
Chertoff, candidate to succeed Gonzales, pledged to investigate Sen. Clinton

Published: Wednesday September 5, 2007

http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Chertoff_candidate_to_suceed_Gonzales_pledged_0905.html



"Shortly after President Bush took office in 2001, Michael Chertoff, then head of the Justice Department's criminal division, met with the conservative group Judicial Watch," begins an article that went all but missed in Tuesday's LA Times. "It wanted criminal charges brought against Hillary Rodham Clinton in connection with a lavish fundraising event in Los Angeles the year before."

"Chertoff personally assured us he would pursue it," the group's president, Tom Fitton told the Times' reporters, recalling the meeting with several top Justice officials. "They said they weren't afraid of taking on the Clintons."

The Department opted not to pursue a case against New York's junior senator, they note. Instead, they went after one of her fundraisers, David Rosen, who was later acquitted.

In the wake of Alberto Gonzales' resignation as Attorney General, Chertoff appears among the shortlisted candidates to succeed him. "Justice Department officials say pressure from Judicial Watch -- which made its name by suing the Clintons in the 1990s -- played no role in the decision to prosecute Rosen," adds the Times. "Chertoff will not discuss the case. But it seems to be an early example of department actions under Bush that critics say were tinged with partisanship."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't Chertoff based in NYC and also involved in looking into
Clinton's Rich pardon? (There was a woman prosecutor from NYC involved as well..)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if this will change HRC's opinion of Chertoff?
http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=145183&keyword=chertoff&phrase=&contain=

Statement of Senator Clinton on Her Vote on the Nomination of Michael Chertoff to be Secretary of Homeland Security

There is no position in government of greater importance to the security of our country and of my home state of New York than that of the Secretary of Homeland Security. It has been said before, but it bears repeating -- our Nation faces a new kind of challenge to our way of life. I have no doubt we will overcome this challenge, but we will do so only by maintaining and strengthening our civil society and our commitment to being a force for decency and respect for law in the world. After rigorous review of Judge Chertoff's testimony and my personal discussion with him, I have come to the conclusion that Judge Chertoff is professionally qualified to be Secretary of Homeland Security and that he understands and respects the values that the Secretary works to defend.

Judge Chertoff's stated commitment to threat-and vulnerability-based funding and his repeated expressions of support for policies that are essential to the security of New Yorkers are decisive factors in my decision to vote for his confirmation.

(snip)

Finally, I was pleased to learn that Judge Chertoff testified that his personal experiences have given him a thorough appreciation and respect for state and local perspectives. I agree wholeheartedly that we need to work in partnership with state and local governments. When it comes to securing the homeland, states and local communities must be full partners.

I remain deeply concerned about the misguided and potentially unconstitutional policies that have been drafted by the Justice Department and implemented by the Administration in its prosecution of the war on terror and in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. And I am grateful that the Senate devoted time to a thorough discussion of these important issues. However, these concerns have nothing to do with Judge Chertoff's personal abilities and commitment to public service, and Judge Chertoff has expressed his personal disagreement with many of these policies. Ultimately, his roots in the New Jersey-New York region, his personal experiences, and his expressions of commitment to the rule of law and programs and policies that will help protect New York and our nation have secured my vote in favor of confirmation. I call upon Judge Chertoff to work with Congress to ensure that the Administration is vigilant in its efforts to protect our liberty and keep our nation secure.

(more... )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. He promised that in 2001? Er....heckuva job, Dildohead!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. skeletor!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. There won't be a recess appointment
Senate's back in session, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC