Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unless im mistaken i believe that the supreme court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:41 PM
Original message
Unless im mistaken i believe that the supreme court
once ruled that any international accord signed by the US becomes law in the USA as well. In this case, why aren't we applying the Nuremberg trial rules against this bunch of thugs? Conspiring to start a war of aggression and crimes against humanity? Or is it because of our tendency to think of ourselves as being so superior certain rules don't apply to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not just the Supreme Court, but the Constitution...
Article VI

All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. then....
cant one hold the current congress in contempt for not enforcing the constitution? It might sound silly but it does appear there might be a basis for that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The only ones to do that would be the Judicial branch, and they suck at it...
My problem with Congress is that they gave up entirely too much power into the office of ONE person, and that's dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. If memory serves,
one of the first things this "misadministration" did was minimize the Kyoto accords.

Then they proceeded to discredit the UN relentlessly and assumed the inability to prosecute by the ICC in short order.

Their presumed impunity is totaly without merit.

Nor is there trashing of the constitituion or there eviseration of the rule of law, nor them rolling back accountability to pre Magna Carta standards.

It's all bull and it's all unsustainable.

Times will change as the pendulum swings.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The US has never ratified the Kyoto accord...
it's not binding on the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think that includes the Nuremberg trials
But UN treaties and the Geneva Conventions do apply as US law. There is plenty of domestic law they could be tried on. We don't need another law so much as a good constable to enforce it. That's supposed to be the DOJ's and Congress's job but they've failed to do it so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC