Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa Governor Wants January Caucuses (NYT blog)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:28 PM
Original message
Iowa Governor Wants January Caucuses (NYT blog)
Source: NYT/The Caucus Blog

August 10, 2007, 1:06 pm
Iowa Governor Wants January Caucuses

By Jeff Zeleny

DES MOINES – The 2008 presidential campaign should start
– and finish – in 2008.

That’s the view of Gov. Chet Culver of Iowa, who pledged
today to do everything he could to keep the Iowa caucuses,
which traditionally kick off the nominating process, from being
held in December.

As he walked into the Capitol today, Mr. Culver carried a copy
of The Des Moines Register, which had a front-page banner
headline: “December caucuses a possibility.”

In an interview, Mr. Culver said he would do whatever he could
to prevent the race from starting that early.

“We’re not going in December,” he said. “It just doesn’t make
sense.”

-snip-

Read more: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/10/iowa-governor-wants-january-caucuses



Source: Associated Press

Iowa Governor Wants Caucuses in January

Friday August 10, 2007 9:16 PM

By MIKE GLOVER

Associated Press Writer

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) - Iowa's Democratic governor said Friday
the state's presidential caucuses should be held in January 2008,
rejecting suggestions that the rush to move up primaries should
push the contests into December.

“In this state, we're going to still have Christmas,” Gov. Chet
Culver said at a news conference. “We're very firm in the fact
that we're going to have the caucuses in January. To go into
2007 makes no sense at all.”

-snip-

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6841570,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. this getting earlier crap is ridiculous
Hell we might as well start having primaries the month after the elections. And I thinks it pretty damned arrogant of New Hampshirites to insist they have to be first. Is that in the constitution somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If it's early enough it will become irrelevant.
So, what, a couple of states could hold their primaries now even, but then things could radically change in several months. It would become farcical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC