Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Gallup Poll: Hillary Increases Lead to 22 Points - - - 48%!!! Tops in Foreign Policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:12 PM
Original message
New Gallup Poll: Hillary Increases Lead to 22 Points - - - 48%!!! Tops in Foreign Policy
Sen. Hillary Clinton strengthened her frontrunner status in the Democratic field over the past month, pulling 10 points further ahead of Sen. Barack Obama than she was in mid-July. According to the August 3-5 USA Today/Gallup Poll, none of the other announced contenders for the 2008 Democratic nomination are within striking distance of Clinton, and only former Sen. John Edwards appears strong enough to potentially compete with Obama for second place.

Clinton is now the preferred nominee of 48% of Democrats nationwide, compared with Obama's 26%. Last month, she led by a smaller 12-point margin, 40% vs. 28%. Most of the change is due to increased support for Clinton rather than a decline in support for Obama.

Clinton's improved standing in the latest poll is also reflected in a separate question asking Democrats who they would vote for should the Democratic field narrow down to just Clinton and Obama. Clinton now leads Obama by a 23-point margin on this measure, 59% to 36%. Last month she held a much smaller 12-point lead; however the current spread is similar to where she stood earlier this year.

Not only is Clinton generally preferred for the nomination over Obama, but in a new question asking Democrats which of the two candidates would do the better job handling four specific foreign policy responsibilities, Clinton wins hands-down on each.

The survey was conducted after Obama's widely publicized August 1 foreign policy speech in which he took a hard line against al Qaeda, saying that as president he would not wait for approval from Pakistan's government to authorize any military action he felt was warranted against terrorist sites in Pakistan. He also said he would meet with the leaders of hostile countries such as Cuba and North Korea, something his opponents have seized on to reinforce the perception that Obama lacks the experience necessary to be president.

Thus, it is notable that the poll finds Clinton leading Obama by her widest margins in perceived handling of international terrorism, and "relations with nations that are unfriendly to the United States." This could potentially explain Clinton's recent rise in the polls.



http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=28345
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. But how does Hillary fare among all voters, not just Democrats.
There's the rub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. one election at a time. The nomination comes first, there's the rub
...but other recent polls find her doing quite well among all voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But does less well among "likely voters" than she does among "voters"...
Hillary's lead shrinks a little - to 16 - among those "likely" voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. Ouch, a 16 point lead.
She's doing fine because she is coming across as presidential. I've watched her for many years now and really do think she is the right candidate to be president now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think that's not a good idea
We shouldn't nominate someone if we know they're going to be weak in the national election (I'm not saying Clinton will be). Electability is an issue we should consider, as we can't handle another four years of Republicans in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. The nomination coming first is an excellent idea
:shrug:

We have NO IDEA how strong the candidate will be 14 months from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I disagree
We can tell which candidates will have appeal more than others. Look at their records, their campaign abilities, personal appeal, etc. It's not exactly impossible to predict how our candidates will stack up against the range of Republican candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. you disagree we should nominate someone first?
And, by your criteria, comparing candidates, the lefter the candidate, the worse choice he'd be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. This is getting...
ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for posting. WOW, beautiful dark green. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. like a projectile hurl...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. makes you sick, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. um...
ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I can understand why those poll number would make you sick.
Obama must be puking his guts out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Nobody said it would be easy...standing up to Hill and the establishment Machine.
Lobbyist-fueled, PAC-driven and all...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You think Obama doesn't have enough money?
Last time I looked he was leading in that category!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You beat me to that smilie!
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rasmussen is showing that Obama is climbing up again
And Hill's numbers have been going down slowly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. OT to these guys
The subject is only Hillary ahead in the polls THEY like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. no, not OT, just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. nope! Sorry to disappoint
From YESTERDAY'S Rasmussen:

"New York Senator Hillary Clinton has fallen below the 40% mark for the first time in more than two weeks. The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows Clinton at 38% and Illinois Senator Barack Obama at 27%. Clinton’s lead over Obama has declined for four straight days..."

From TODAY'S Rasmussen:

"In the race for the Democratic Presidential nomination, New York Senator Hillary Clinton has a twelve-point advantage over Illinois Senator Barack Obama. It’s Clinton 40% and Obama 28%.."

The four-day trend has reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. They have to throw them a bone at least once a week.
Reporting on a daily basis is about as desperate as you can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Don't know what to say...
Other than these number bear out what many other polls have been saying...including the recent Quinnipiac polls in FL, OH, and PA which show her strongest against the Republican candidates...she is perceived, correctly in my view, as the candidate most prepared to hit the ground running on day one...people know where she wants to lead, but also know she will do so based on the facts, not the distortions and polarization that comes from a Presidential campaign...

It also shows her competitors are going to have to come up with something other than gimmicks to catch up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beastieboy Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. I think you are right on.
Her biggest selling point will be that she seems so prepared and competent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is Gallup the same one which continually gave the election to Bush by a wide margin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC