Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Genealogists call Bush and Kerry kin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:43 PM
Original message
Genealogists call Bush and Kerry kin
oh...........dear.........God

Big Isle researchers claim
the president and his top
opponent are distant cousins


By Matt Sedensky
Associated Press

Democratic presidential candidates are constantly being compared with the current commander in chief. Now, two Hawaii genealogy buffs say they have proof President Bush and the current Democratic front-runner share similarities thicker than water.

Bruce and Kristine Harrison, publishers of historical databases, traced back the family histories of Bush and Democratic Sen. John Kerry.

The result? They're cousins.

Well, 16th cousins, three times removed, to be exact. But cousins, nonetheless.

http://starbulletin.com/2004/02/16/news/story3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is too funny
That's WAY more than 7degrees of seperation. Wonder if they can link me to Teresa Heinz Kerry? That would make my day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heritic Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. (shivers uncontrollably)
Wow, if I found out I was relate to Bush, I think I would need to take a bath. In acid. And use a wire brush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. yes it is disturbing
turns out I'm 12th cousins to shrub... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. *cough* Skull & Bones *cough*
Welcome our new aristocratic overlords.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paranoid_Portlander Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm confused.
What is the difference between 3rd cousins 16 times removed, and 16th cousins 3 times removed? I'm sure there is a difference, but I find it hard to visualise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hope these articles add perspective.
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 04:12 PM by secondtermdenier
Many unremarkable Americans are more closely related to either guy. I'm actually surprised the link is so distant. "16th cousin, 3 times removed" means they don't share an ancestor until well before the 17th century. 1. http://www.magic-city-news.com/article_939.shtml 2.http://share-hodgson.org/cousins.html 3.http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paranoid_Portlander Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for the links.
I didn't realize cousin relationships were so complicated, and this assumes that none of the cousins are married to each other (legal in some states), which would really tangle the family tree in a knot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. A dozen years ago, i visited my 17th cousin in England,

stayed on his farm. The tie between us is one marriage made in the early 1600's.

And of course the farther back you can trace your family, the more people you find yourselves related to.

People whose families have had money find it much easier to trace their family because of property records. If my ancestors hadn't been wealthy, I wouldn't know nearly as much about who my people were and where they came from. If only they'd passed along some of that wealth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Without reading up on geaneology
can you just give a clue about what "3 times removed" means? I think I already know about the "16th cousin" part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mo_lurker Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. "removed" cousins
Think of it like this:

My daughter and my brother's daughter are 1st cousins
our grandaughters 2nd cousins
great grandaughters 3rd cousins

As long as they are on the "same level" there is nothing "removed"

However, the difference in "level" is what is removed. My daughter and my brother's grandaughter would be:
1st cousins (my daughter's level/the higher of the 2 levels) once removed (the difference in the two levels)

So 17th cousins 3 times removed means that 17 generations from Kerry and 20 from Bush (or vice versa) there were siblings, a great, great . . . dad/mom for both of them.

Hope that helps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannygoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder what Burke's Peerage has to say about who will win this year's
election? Remember this from the 2000 election?

Victory is in the blood for 'aristocratic' Republican
http://www.guardian.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,2763,393341,00.html

<snip>

Special report: the US elections

Press Association
Monday November 6, 2000
The Guardian

The Republican George W Bush will be elected US president on November 7 because he has more royal blood than his opponent, it was claimed today.

The Texas governor has twice as many ties with aristocrats than his Democrat rival Al Gore, according to Burke's Peerage.

The company, which publishes books on ancestry, aristocracy and history, has predicted the outcome of the presidential race for almost 200 years. It says the candidate with the most royal blood has always been the victor.

Mr Bush has direct descents from William the Conqueror, Henry II and Charles II, according to Burke's Peerage.

More...

If only we knew which of our candidates had more 'royal' blood than * we'd win! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pillowbiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, weren't Cain and Able related?
and one of them was a really bad seed, if I recall.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes... Abel n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. er, , , wasn't it 'Cain slew Abel'?

Making Cain the first murderer, and putting the 'mark of Cain' on his descendants?

(They'd be the ones always 'raising Cain,' I suppose.) ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. well he is related to powell too then there was a thread showing bush and
powell had similar family tree as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. The article points out that Bush is likely related to

all the candidates, meaning Kerry is related to everyone else, too, and claims they're both related to Marilyn Monroe and Walt Disney.

It may be true. However, the guy releasing this info is selling a CD-ROM for amateur genealogists. I looked at his page and it's hard to tell without more investigation whether it's legit or like those "We Have Your Family Crest!" (for a price) ads in magazines. Legit or bogus, he'll make money because of the "Bush and Kerry are cousins" story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Figures.
Yup, they are two of a kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finch Donating Member (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Dean+ Bush
Wasn’t Dean either related to…or is family was very close to the Bush’s at one point… its that whole settler aristocracy thing… Bush’s from Connecticut…Dean’s from Long Island... Kerry’s from Massachusetts… weird to see how their status endures for so long… Would’nt begrudge them their heritage though…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. The Quayles are much closer related don't forget
Dan Q and Pappy B, if memory serves from highschool, are like 3rd cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paranoid_Portlander Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC