Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can One Reporter Take Down a Presidential Candidate? - Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:24 PM
Original message
Can One Reporter Take Down a Presidential Candidate? - Edwards
Can One Reporter Take Down a Presidential Candidate? John Solomon Is Trying to Find Out
By Alexander Zaitchik--AlterNet
Saturday, August 4, 2007

----
Earlier this summer, the Washington Post ran a profile of Joseph Torrenueva, a Beverly Hills Democrat better known these days as John Edwards' barber. The article, which led the paper's "style" section, has achieved minor infamy for the author's solemn assertion, "It is some kind of commentary on the state of American politics that hair seems to have attracted as much attention as, say, his position on healthcare."

Has it now? The truth is nobody knew anything about Joe Torrenueva before the Post article appeared. Miniscandals about politicians' haircuts are more like Chia pets than human heads of hair. They don't grow on their own. They require reporters to pursue and water them with investigations into the practices and prices of high-end barbers; only then is national attention focused on who and what presidential candidates pay for their monthly snips. The Torrenueva profile didn't offer "some kind of commentary" on the state of American politics so much as it offered insight into the peculiar priorities of its author, Post money and politics reporter John Solomon.

If Solomon were some deadbeat alt-weekly columnist with a grudge against Edwards, the haircut story would make for mere humor, but the Post has reach far beyond its own pages -- it's one of a handful of media outlets that can establish diehard narratives about politicians that can dog them for decades. The Post in Solomon’s hands is a weapon that can almost single-handedly force Edwards or another candidate off their campaign focus. In the case of Edwards, that means a total distraction from trying to start a national discussion on poverty issues.

No one who has followed Solomon's controversial reporting career was surprised to see his byline on the Torrenueva profile. When he jumped from the Associated Press to the Post at the end of 2006, Solomon took his well-known obsessions with him. Among these are the personal finances of prominent Democrats and, apparently, their boyish bangs.

The only thing that likely surprised Solomon watchers about the Torrenueva profile was its placement in the "style" section. This may have even surprised Solomon himself, as the article appears written with more prime Post real estate in mind. How else to explain Solomon's newsy tone, as if the words of Joe Torrenueva, stylist to the stars, could unleash another season's worth of Hairgate exposes leading all the way up to and through the door of the Edwards' campaign bus?

(...)

If Solomon expected placement of the Torrenueva article in the news section, it's understandable. After all, one of his very first stories for the Post set a precedent for landing his petty and misfiring Edwards hit-jobs on A1. Back in January, fresh to the job, Solomon penned an article with Lois Romano that announced the sale of Edwards' Georgetown home for $5.2 million -- or $1.4 million more than he paid for it in 2002. Although practically dripping with innuendo that Edwards had been involved in a sleazy land deal with known criminals and then lied about it, the article noticeably failed to contain any dirt. The article basically reported that Edwards had bought a house in D.C.'s booming real estate market, fixed it up and sold it three years later for a profit. The banality of these facts did not stop Post editors from placing the article above the fold, alongside the latest news from Iraq.

A couple of weeks after Solomon reported on the unremarkable sale of Edwards' Georgetown mansion, Post ombudswoman Deborah Howell conceded that the story was controversial in the paper's own newsroom for being "accurate misleading ... 'gotcha' without the 'gotcha.'"

(...)

Take two Solomon stories from April and May of this year. The stories highlight the consulting work Edwards did in 2005 and 2006 for Fortress Investment Group, a New York-based firm with a $30 billion hedge fund basket, all of them incorporated in the Cayman Islands, the famous tax shelter. As a presidential candidate, Edwards has decried offshore tax shelters, and Solomon's April 23 story (co-written by Alec MacGillis) "Hedge-Fund Ties Help Edwards Campaign; Firms Increase Political Gifts" was justified in highlighting the discrepancy between Edwards' statements on tax shelters and his lobbying efforts on behalf of Fortress, which included a May 2006 meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

But even as the piece noted that Edwards was hardly alone in his ties to the hedge fund industry -- Rudy Giuliani raised nearly as much as Edwards for his campaign from hedge fund Elliott Associates -- the article pointedly returned to the object of Solomon's obsession, Edwards, and ended by implying that Edwards was not, and perhaps could not be, an honest advocate for the poor as he claimed. To drive the point home, Solomon again mentioned the $400 haircuts. Four months later, he would track down Joe Torrenueva and get the whole story, increasing the chances that, in his words, "the whole issue go away."

(...)

In 2006, his last year at the AP, Solomon made a name for himself on liberal blogs and media watching sites with sustained and poorly researched attacks on Harry Reid, who survived the assault to become Senate majority leader in November.

http://www.alternet.org/story/58593/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only if people are stupid enough to focus on his shit and believe his
lunatic ranting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. dah-----how many pages of threads did DU have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Man, I do not know. But it was laughable. And what was weird was so many
of the people bashing Edwards are the same people who think Bill Clinton's shit don't stink. And he shut down the investigations into Reagan and Poopy's nefarious activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I had the haircut argument from
a DUer the other day....It just blows my mind that there are some that still buy this shit. The argument was how could he talk about poverty and get a $400.00 haircut.....oookkay, so the only people qualified to talk about poverty are those that are living it? What naivete, what presidential candidate who has a snowballs chance in hell to win not wealthy? So I guess none of the candidates are allowed to talk or do something about it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Too damn many if you ask me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, especially when others follow.
That is what happened to Biden in '88.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sure can, but it depends on the story. Remember George Alan?
Yes I know the original I saw was on youtube, but the media grabbed that and he was done in less than a week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank You For Posting This Info AND Thanks To Alterman!
I really have ALWAYS had a lot of respect for him.

Now, WHERE do we find this SOLOMON fellow?? He needs a good punch in the nose at the very least! I've said this before and will say it again, as time goes by I think we will see Edwards creeping further up and up and I believe he will get the nod! So many of my friends and even one of my Repuke relatives says she likes him much more than "HER" candidates, and any other Democratic candidate!

We may just find that many Repukes will fall on their sword and go for Johnny, especially down here in the south!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, one can.
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 04:07 PM by Totally Committed
I saw Nagourney take out Wes Clark with one article.

I think Edwards has handled this very well.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards handled it well. He sort of laughed it off. It is dead as an issue, IMHO.
Is this all they got? I mean, I don't think average Americans care if he made a profit on the sale of his house. Most people are very interested in doing just the same thing.

Both John and Elizabeth Edwards have shown themselves to fight back right away (or in the case of the haircut, treat it as the trivia that it really is). I don't think they'll let the press or anyone else get away with the stuff John Kerry allowed them to do. Have we all forgotten that this guy was a big trial lawyer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. That haircut has done untold damage
to his campaign. I'm sure Hillary is going to Supercuts. :eyes: Romney cuts his own hair in the bathroom mirror because it's all he can afford. Rudy refuses to comb his hair until the genocide in Darfor is stopped. This is just nuts. I can't believe how something this stupid could sink a great candidate. Forget any of that other stuff you were talking about. It's all the haircut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R!


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dk2 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. You know
There are just some reporters that shouldn't be reporters, it makes you wonder who is paying them, and why can't they be fired.

Some get on such a bias rant they can't possibly see the sky up above. When will they figure it out, the people want JRE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. The media and 'others' are trying to 'kill' Edwards off
I don't mean literally but there is a conspiracy to trounce him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Exactly, Bambino...
John Edwards is a threat to the status quo. The powers that be do not like a candidate reminding them about poverty, job loss, health care, etc. He's not bought and paid for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC