In my local newspaper today there's an interview with renowned peace and conflict expert
Johan Galtung, who is director of the international TRANSCEND network, and considered the founder of peace and conflict research. Here's some of what he says (my translations.)
"Hillary Clinton doesn't have a noble motive when it comes to withdrawing American troops from Iraq. She's not against the war. She's only against losing the war," says Galtung, who thinks the presidential election isn't interesting. (He has predicted the downfall of the US as a superpower, just as he did in the 70s with the fall of the USSR set to 1990.)
"The USA should have realized the consequences of the fact that the attack (9/11-01) was partly caused by their own politics. They should have immediately recognized a Palestinian state." He also thinks that of the three Western countries that have experienced (Islamic fundamentalist) terror attacks, Spain and Zapatero handled it best.
Galtung also says it would be cowardly of the West to withdraw from the Iraqi war now. He thinks that the United States should apologize to the Iraqis, and then take of their uniforms and start doing humanitarian work. "But the US doesn't have the moral courage to do that," says Galtung. He thinks that negotiations is a must, and the only way to achieve peace in Iraq is if the three parts of the country can find a consensus to form a loosely connected state.
With regards to Afghanistan, he thinks that the US and Europe should stay away, and that the Afghani can make peace with hlp from their Muslim neighbors. "Americans are lousy mediators of peace."
He also criticizes Norwegian efforts to negotiate a peace treaty between the Tamils and the Sinhalese in Sri Lanka.
http://www.bt.no/utenriks/article392051.ece (Norwegian article)