|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:15 PM Original message |
Proof that Edwards and Clinton were not conniving against the others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Edwards wanted a rotation from what I hear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. Tempest in a teapot. I agree with them, the groups need to be smaller. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
5X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Screw any of you that would deny me my rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Please pay attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
5X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 07:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
46. Go be condescending elsewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. He also said "They're not serious." So are we going to have serious and non-serious goups? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Who's not serious? What was the context? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:02 PM Original message |
I take it from the lack of an answer that you don't know the context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Well, he's right. Some of them aren't serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. He was probably referring to the farces know as debates, not particular candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Them? Clinton blamed it on Edwards. Which them do you believe again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Oh fachrissake. They had a conversation, that some are trying to call WHISPERING, but they were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Speaking of Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. He's milking this like a mooing cow, though. His written statements are 180 out from his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PinkTiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
56. Kucinich is an interesting guy, but he is not going to go the distance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. To me, this hurts Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. You'd think it would--but he's a canny politician. He played it just the way I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
50. fundraising "in earnest"--you mean like taking corporate bribes, like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Awww, boo hoo hooo....like ALL of the top tier candidates get ALL their money from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. whatever--where did I say they ONLY get money from corporations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Ahh, now they're BUSH enablers, because the majority of the party is backing them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Hey - could you give me some info on that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. This whole fake debate thing is the issue, Give us your 90 seconds on subject x is not a debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Exactly. Some might say "they're not serious" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. If three people have a conversation, we'll have some back and forth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. You call that proof? Kind of a stretch,,,,, Why would Edwards and Clinton give conflicting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Okay, well it's proof enough for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. Exactly. All the OP proves is that the Edwards/Clinton folks are desperate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #34 |
48. Its amazing to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. The ability of the faithful to delude themselves is as strong as it ever was, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. Aww, your preferred candidates got bad publicity! Cry about it somewhere else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Great response to the valid points made in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. That's because there were no valid points in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. How about "getting back to" serious debates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Why would they say anything at all, at a Faux event, wearing Faux mikes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 03:19 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Exactly nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. You're rationalizing, which is worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. this certainly deserves a REC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
20. Well, Why Is Kucinich Outraged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I am outraged too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Well I change the channel to Faux every now and then, especially if I want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Because "outrage" got him booked on a half dozen news shows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. ding ding ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freesqueeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. If they think it's too crowded on stage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. Why would they care if just Kucinich heard them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 11:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Because of two people were conniving against other people in the group, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soulshine (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. i'm not sure that's a good argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soulshine (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. A link to the piece in question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. In order to be treated as "serious" though, you have to ACT 'serious' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soulshine (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. What about Richardson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
42. Why did Kucinich avoid showing up to debate Edwards at the Cuomo-Gingrich Cooper Union Challenge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
5X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. I don't see Kucinich's name here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 03:56 AM Response to Original message |
44. the problem as I see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #44 |
49. bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
5X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Not enough time because we have to watch survivor and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 05:06 AM Response to Original message |
45. Edwards blamed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plantwomyn (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
52. What's scary about this to me is this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-14-07 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
54. Why didn't Edwards and Clinton include Obama in their neato idea whe he walked up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC