Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could the missing government e-mails be found in the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 01:04 AM
Original message
Could the missing government e-mails be found in the
data the government is collecting as a part of its spying on citizens? I have no idea how that spying thing works. I'm actually wondering whether it is possible that our own intelligence network could have picked up copies of those e-mails and whether they might be retrievable from its servers or database. I'm a total idiot about computers and ignorant about how the spying project works, but I'm wondering if that is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. There have been many knowledgable posts about the retrievability of this data.
All it takes is know-how and motivation, and those emails can certainly be brought to the light of day -- unless all the hard drives themselves have been melted down. As many people as were cc'd -- that's how many computers will have some of this data.
:evilgrin:

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd like to see one of them
I'm a mail administrator. If the email is gone and there's no backup, it's gone. Especially in Exchange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think they meant the recipients
Edited on Thu Jun-21-07 08:21 AM by Marnieworld
The email would be gone from the senders mailbox and server but not the recipients since that backup and deletion is unknown. For example I'm turdblossom and I send an illegal RNC email to other illegal RNC accounts and some gov accounts too. There's no way of making sure all of those individuals do not have a copy still on their hard drives, Blackberries, copies of mailboxes on different computers. Even if all mail was never retrieved locally and only stored on the server, mail was forwarded outside of that system. From the email evidence revealed it is clear that many RNC emails were sent to gov addresses and vice versa and those addresses, it is my understanding, archive all email by law. So even though they thought they were getting around the archiving with how they sent it they can't control the gov's archiving the received mail. Not to mention other recipients in the cool GOP crowd that might have ordinary accounts on ISPs that are also stored locally. It's a tapestry that can be unravelled if only someone pulls a thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Your company's system doesn't do automatic backups of its files?
My in-house-tech-support (i.e. Mr.H) talks as though this is industry standard. He agrees with the DUers who believe that not everything can be permanently lost, because systems are designed that way.

I don't do backups on my home computer, but that's a different story. But what I also don't do is delete my emails in anything like a timely manner. I tend to sort them into files by subject or sender and keep them, which makes me wonder how many other people, such as those on Rove's mailing lists, do likewise.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. It would figure. Bushistas seem to be particularly adept at screwing themselves.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit, if they inadvertantly collected enough self-incriminating information to bust themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC